Application of New Solid Polymeric Dispersant, Easy-Sperse® P-20 (Spray-Dried Polymer Composites) in Suspension Concentrates and Water Dispersible Granule Formulations—Improvement in Suspensibility and Rain-fastnesss

2011 ◽  
pp. 89-89-11
Author(s):  
W. Zhang ◽  
X. Qu ◽  
D. Jon ◽  
J. Patel ◽  
K. S. Narayanan
Keyword(s):  
Polymer Composites ◽  
Water Dispersible ◽  
Polymeric Dispersant ◽  
Water Dispersible Granule ◽  
Spray Dried

Controlled Release Starch Granule Formulations Reduce Herbicide Leaching in Soil Columns

1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick A. Boydston
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Starch Granule ◽  
Soil Column ◽  
Loamy Sand ◽  
Starch Granules ◽  
Soil Columns ◽  
Sand Soil ◽  
Water Dispersible ◽  
Loamy Sand Soil ◽  
Water Dispersible Granule

Experimental controlled release starch granules (CRSG) containing 5.3% a.i. (w/w) norflurazon or 6% a.i. (w/w) simazine retarded the leaching of both herbicides in loamy sand soil columns when compared to commercial formulations of norflurazon [80% (w/w) dry flowable] or simazine [90% (w/w) water dispersible granule]. Barley bioassays indicated norflurazon and simazine remained in the surface 0 to 2.5 cm of soil when applied as CRSG formulations and moved to a depth of 15 cm when applied as commercial dry formulations and leached with 6 cm of water. CRSG placed on pre-wetted soil columns began to release norflurazon by 7 d at 25 C or 14 d at 15 C, and subsequent leaching moved norflurazon beyond the top 2.5 cm of the soil column.

Winter Annual Broadleaf Weeds and Winter Wheat Response to Postemergence Application of Two Saflufenacil Formulations

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Frihauf ◽  
Phillip W. Stahlman ◽  
Patrick W. Geier ◽  
Dallas E. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Weed Species ◽  
Herbicide Resistant ◽  
Water Dispersible ◽  
Leaf Necrosis ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Rate Formulation ◽  
Water Dispersible Granule

Field experiments in winter wheat were initiated at two locations in the fall of 2006 and 2007 to evaluate winter annual broadleaf weeds and winter wheat response to POST applications of two saflufenacil formulations applied alone and in combination with 2,4-D amine. Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) and water-dispersible granule (WG) formulations of saflufenacil at 13, 25, and 50 g ai ha−1were applied with 1.0% (v/v) crop oil concentrate (COC) and mixed with 2,4-D amine at 533 g ae ha−1without adjuvant. Regardless of rate or formulation, saflufenacil plus COC and saflufenacil plus 2,4-D amine controlled blue mustard ≥ 91% at 17 to 20 d after treatment (DAT) compared with ≤ 50% control with 2,4-D amine alone. At least 25 g ha−1of saflufenacil EC was necessary to control flixweed > 90%. Excluding COC from saflufenacil plus 2,4-D amine reduced flixweed control from the saflufenacil WG formulation more than the EC formulation. Most saflufenacil treatments did not control henbit satisfactorily (≤ 80%). Wheat foliar necrosis increased with increasing saflufenacil rate to as high as 30% at 3 to 6 DAT, but declined to < 15% at 10 to 20 DAT and was not evident at 30 DAT. Saflufenacil rate, formulation, and mixing with 2,4-D amine also influenced wheat stunting, but to a lesser extent than foliar necrosis. Saflufenacil EC consistently caused greater foliar necrosis and stunting on wheat than saflufenacil WG. Leaf necrosis and stunting were reduced by tank-mixing saflufenacil formulations with 2,4-D amine without COC. Grain yields of most saflufenacil treatments were similar to 2,4-D amine under weedy conditions and herbicide treatments had no effect on grain yield in weed-free experiments. Saflufenacil formulations at 25 to 50 g ha−1with 2,4-D amine and saflufenacil WG at 25 to 50 g ha−1with COC can control winter annual broadleaf weeds with minimal injury (< 15%) and no grain yield reductions. The addition of saflufenacil as a POST-applied herbicide would give wheat growers another useful tool to control annual broadleaf weeds, including herbicide-resistant weed species.

scholarly journals New fungicides for protecting vines infected with downy mildew

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 04002
Author(s):  
Viktor Dolzhenko ◽  
Olga Kungurtseva ◽  
Maria Revkova ◽  
Yevgenia Yurchenko ◽  
Natalia Aleynikova
Keyword(s):  
Downy Mildew ◽  
Vegetative Growth ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Saving Rate ◽  
Effective Protection ◽  
Water Dispersible ◽  
Triple Treatment ◽  
Water Dispersible Granule

This research paper presents the findings concerning the effectiveness of utilizing Pergado Zoks water dispersible granule (WDG) and Zorvec Encantia suspo-emulsion (SE) fungicides to protect grapevines against downy mildew. It shows that double or triple treatment of vines provides strong protection of the plants against the disease without adversely affecting vegetative growth of the crop. It has been proven that effective protection of vines against downy mildew through the use of Pergado Zoks WDGs and Zorvec Encantia SE has allowed for ensuring high crop-saving rate (up to 140%) as compared to control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document