On the Borders between Legal and Sociological Method

Weimar ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 57-63
Keyword(s):  
Slavic Review ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-406
Author(s):  
Victor Terras

Today, no less than in the days of Lomonosov and Schlozer, the question of the ethnic identity of the early Kievan rulers is a controversial one. The late Adolf Stender-Petersen's criticism of the Normanist school, “that it replaced a real, well-founded historical view of the course of things by an a priori plan, in which things were arranged as well as possible,” also applies—mutatis mutandis, of course—to the historical-sociological method of the contemporary Soviet anti-Normanist school. What is needed in the field are good editions, with detailed, objective commentary, of all the sources known to us. Eventually these may lead to the “comprehensive edition of all the sources from which we can acquire knowledge as regards the Varangian problem” envisaged by Stender-Petersen. The edition of Constantine Porphyrogenitus, De Administrando Imperio by Gyula Moravcsik and R. J. H. Jenkins and the commentary edited by the latter may be cited as an important step toward this goal.


2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzie Guth ◽  
Cherry Schrecker
Keyword(s):  

The rapid development of the Internet has had an unprecedented impact on the improvement of the sociological method. At the turn of the millennium, this has led to the search for a new methodology and a gradual loss of interest to use of quantitative methods, which was perceived by specialists as a "crisis of empirical sociology". In the last decade, it turned out that almost all social processes of any level find their reflection in the virtual space, leave and accumulate so-called "digital footprints", which opens to researchers the widest perspectives for study of social reality. This article considers the features of digital primary information and generalized approaches to its use in terms of quantitative methodology. The author emphasizes that the classical sociological methods, which are based on mathematical statistics, are suitable for the analysis of digital reality and getting adequate research results. At the same time, as noted by most authors, who have studied this subject, there are perspectives for improving traditional sociological methods through: 1) a combination of representativeness of quantitative and depth of qualitative approaches to information analysis; 2) in-depth collection of paradata; 3) opportunities to study hard-to-reach social groups; 4) opportunities to fully implement the "principle of freedom from evaluation" due to the "non-reactivity" of digital data; 5) the ordering of digital footprints in space and time by clearly fixing the hosting. The post-demographic model of the social actor opens new ways to build samples of quantitative sociological research, which may be representative in terms of the classical sociological approach. The examples of research from this article show that the classical sociological method easily to adapt for the new digital reality and can be the basis for sociological consulting, development of social technologies in various spheres of social life.


Moldoscopie ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 94-111
Author(s):  
Catalin Bordeianu ◽  
◽  
◽  

In the constellation that is the three great social thinkers from the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th, Vilfredo Pareto’s stance regarding the reports between sociology, as a science, and philosophy is a specific one, generating consequences, the most significant in the scheme of an idealistic portrait of the consequences of the positivist method in sociology. Because the Italian sociologist seems to prolong the classic aversion overseeing positivism in philosophy until it became a usual attitude of work and, in the same time, reaching the extreme lengths at which philosophy negates it, on the basis of positive prerogatives of knowledge, overseeing any epistemological status.


1990 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 321
Author(s):  
W. Watts Miller ◽  
Mike Gane
Keyword(s):  

1920 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore de Laguna
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Park Turner

Durkheim's The Rules of Sociological Method has never enjoyed the same reputation as his major books, in part because the book is uncongenial to standard interpretations of Durkheim. In particular, its attacks on teleology do not fit his reputation as a functionalist The papers in this special issue address the work historically. Both Porter and Stedman Jones deal with aspects of the context in which Durkheim worked and transformed. Schmaus and Nemedi deal with problems of interpreting Durkheim's development, and Platt discusses the reception of The Rules. The papers shed light on such important questions as the meaning of Durkheim's slogan “society is made of representations.” Durkheim, it appears, was not only what would now be called a constructionist, he went on to ask whether the fact that constructions are real in their consequences did not imply the reality causal reality of constructions and, therefore, a specific kind of “social realism.” The problem The Rules poses, of what is the fundamental stuff of society, is “classic” in significance, and Durkheim's answer is classically radical


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document