Life Sentences in the Federal System

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 312-321 ◽  
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aneeta Rattan ◽  
Cynthia S. Levine ◽  
Jennifer L. Eberhardt ◽  
Carol S. Dweck
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Elizabeth Sunder ◽  
Cheryl Meyer ◽  
Brittany Bak ◽  
Brianna Grover ◽  
Benjamin Hendrickson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 0160323X2098684
Author(s):  
John Kincaid ◽  
J. Wesley Leckrone

The comparatively poor U.S. response to COVID-19 was not due to federal inaction or a flawed federal system per se but to party polarization and presidential and gubernatorial preferences that frustrated federalism’s capacity to respond more effectively. The U.S. response is examined in terms of four models: coercive or regulatory federalism, nationalist cooperative federalism, non-centralized cooperative federalism, and dual federalism--finding that state-led dual federalism was the predominant response. The crisis also raised questions about interpretations of “federal inaction” because party divisions led some to regard the federal government’s response as inadequate while others viewed it as appropriate.


1982 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-363
Author(s):  
ALBERT DAVIS ◽  
ROBERT LUCKE

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document