Faculty Teaching Goals, 1968-1973

1976 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 298-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald M. Platt ◽  
Talcott Parsons ◽  
Rita Kirshstein
1976 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 298-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald M. Platt ◽  
Talcott Parsons ◽  
Rita Kirshstein

Author(s):  
Lisa Brown ◽  
Laurie Fox ◽  
Miranda Carney-Morris ◽  
Beth Lynn Nolen

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanette P. Napier ◽  
Sonal Dekhane ◽  
Stella Smith

This paper describes the conversion of an introductory computing course to the blended learning model at a small, public liberal arts college. Blended learning significantly reduces face-to-face instruction by incorporating rich, online learning experiences. To assess the impact of blended learning on students, survey data was collected at the midpoint and end of semester, and student performance on the final exam was compared in traditional and blended learning sections. To capture faculty perspectives on teaching blended learning courses, written reflections and discussions from faculty teaching blended learning sections were analyzed. Results indicate that student performance in the traditional and blended learning sections of the course were comparable and that students reported high levels of interaction with their instructor. Faculty teaching the course share insights on transitioning to the blended learning format.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel J. Beane ◽  
◽  
R. Heather Macdonald ◽  
Richelle M. Allen-King ◽  
Tessa M. Hill ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-ah Choi ◽  
Jae Hoon Lim

AbstractThis paper is a self-reflective narrative of our teaching experience as two immigrant Asian female professors who teach Multicultural Education. Employing collaborative autoethnography (CAE), the study addresses the issues of authority, positionality, and legitimacy of knowledge claims in critical feminist pedagogy. Two research questions guided our inquiry: 1. How does a teacher’s racial positionality play out in exercising professional knowledge, and conversely, 2. How does seemingly neutral professional knowledge become racialized in the discussions of race? Major findings demonstrate the double-edged contradictions in the body/knowledge nexus manifested in our everyday teaching contexts. On the one hand, the bodily dimension of teacher knowledge is de-racialized because of institutional norms and cultures. On the other hand, there are times professional knowledge becomes racialized through the teacher’s body. Understanding the body/knowledge nexus that invites precarious power dynamics in racial discussions and even blatantly dismisses our professional knowledge, we, as an immigrant faculty of color, find it impossible to create a safe environment for participatory, critical discourse. Acknowledging our triple marginality, we put forth the concept of “pedagogy of fear” (Leonardo, Z., & Porter, R. K. (2010). Pedagogy of fear: Toward a Fanonian theory of ‘safety’ in race dialogue. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 13(2), 139–157) which squarely disrupts the idea of a safe environment in race dialog and urges teachers to confront their own/their students’ fear and create a space of teaching vulnerably.


1978 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Tennyson ◽  
Richard C. Boutwell ◽  
Susan Frey

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1085-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Ardalan ◽  
Roya Ardalan ◽  
Samuel Coppage ◽  
William Crouch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document