scholarly journals Analytical And Critical Thinking Skills Of Cadets And Post-Graduate Students

Author(s):  
L. P. Kostikova
2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Genevieve Pinto Zipp ◽  
Valerie Olson

Effective mentorship is demonstrated in a variety of venues. Good mentors lead students on a journey that forever changes the ways in which they think and act, and consists of different and diverse experiences. Acknowledging faculty beliefs regarding mentorship and instruction is important to understanding why mentors select and implement specific strategies throughout the mentee’s academic tenure. The purposes of this paper are first, to describe the “Layered Learning Mentorship Model (LLMM)” presented in the Department of Graduate Programs in Heath Sciences curriculum; second, to provide an understanding of how the LLMM was developed so as to promote critical thinking skills in graduate students; third, to provide educators with an understanding of the tools essential for the integration of critical thinking opportunities at all levels of doctoral education; and finally, to assess student and faculty perceptions regarding the use of LLMM.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
Vahideh Zarea Gavgani ◽  
Hakimeh Hazrati ◽  
Zohreh Sohrabi

Abstract Background and Objectives: Critical thinking skills are not learned spontaneously. Higher education system should strengthen critical thinking skills of learners by integrating critical thinking skills into educational programs. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of problem-based learning and reasoning tests on strengthening learners' critical thinking skills before and after the educational intervention in graduate students of basic sciences. Material and Methods: This study is a quasi-experimental study that was conducted in 2020 at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and Iran. Participants in the study were graduate students in the fields of medical education and Medical Library and Information Science. Problem-based learning theory and application of reasoning tests in the level of critical thinking of learners before and after the educational intervention; the California Critical Thinking Questionnaire was reviewed. Data analysis was performed using Spss 19 software. Statistical methods such as frequency, percentage and mean standard deviation have been used to study descriptive statistics and the significance level of the data has been investigated using nonparametric Wilcoxon test. Results: The level of critical thinking of students in the field of medical education before the educational intervention was moderate (2.92 ± 9.01) and weak in the field of Medical Library and Information Science (6.80 ± 80.95). After the educational intervention, the level of critical thinking of learners in both disciplines has significantly increased. In the field of analysis, the rate of critical thinking in both disciplines was lower than other domains before the intervention, which was higher than the other domains after the educational intervention. Conclusion:The present study showed that designing effective educational interventions in the fields of teaching and assessment methods lead to strengthening learners' critical thinking skills. By using new methods of evaluation and teaching, the education system can produce graduate students with the competency to create new ideas and novel approaches.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Yvonne Malone ◽  
Tony Michael

The authors added debates in two adolescent psychology classes in the southern region of the United States that were heretofore a lecture class. There were approximately 45 students in each of the classes, including both undergraduate and graduate students, and debate teams consisted of four to five members. Each debate was allotted one class period (80 minutes): 60 minutes of debate time with the last 20 minutes reserved for questions and discussion from the entire class. Students took a survey before and after the debates, rating themselves on critical thinking skills. Based on their ratings, there was significant perceived improvement after participating in debates. Last, the authors conclude with providing future considerations and tips to other educators for implementing debates within their course.   Keywords: Debates, collaborative learning, critical thinking, pedagogy, college students.    


Author(s):  
Dr. Sanjivani Wanjari ◽  
Dr. Sunita Vagha ◽  
Dr. Chandrashekar Mahakalkar

Background:Critical Thinking is a human cognitive process which is characterized by a purposeful self-regulatory judgement. Acquiring critical thinking is a question of practice. Clinical competence depends upon critical thinking skills and problem solving abilities. This will be possible when postgraduate students are taught to use critical thinking skills in order to make sound clinical judgments. Aim: To study the utility of “Critical Self Thinking Inventory for Clinical Examination” (CSTI-CE) for assessment of critical thinking skills during OSLER in post-graduate students of Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly Reed Cain ◽  
Vivana Giraud ◽  
Nicole L. P. Stedman ◽  
Brittany L. Adams

Author(s):  
Jian Li ◽  
Yan Ren

In recent years, Chinese college students have been criticized for having nothing to say, no thinking ability, and lack of critical thinking. Cultivating students' thinking ability is becoming an important task of higher education. Through carrying out questionnaire survey and interviews, the author learned that graduate students' critical thinking skills in academic reading needs to be improved. To improve the situation, it requires joint efforts of teachers and students to improve students' critical thinking ability in academic reading, which is conducive to the completion of academic papers and the improvement of students' thinking ability, so as to meet the requirements of higher thinking ability for students in the 21st century.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document