scholarly journals Nasal Septal Suture Technique versus Nasal Packing after Septoplasty: A Prospective Comparative Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Borligegowda Viswanatha
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Suture Technique ◽  
Nasal Packing ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Septal Suture

Nasal Septal Suture Technique versus Nasal Packing after Septoplasty

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 599-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Altan Yildirim ◽  
Mehmet Yasar ◽  
Ali Ihsan Bebek ◽  
Ercan Canbay ◽  
Tanfer Kunt
Keyword(s):  
Middle Ear ◽  
Suture Technique ◽  
Septal Deviation ◽  
Nasal Packing ◽  
Blood Gas ◽  
Nasal Septal Deviation ◽  
Nasal Cavities ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Middle Ear Pressure ◽  
Septal Suture

Background The aim of this study was to compare eustachian function and blood gas changes with nasal packing (NP) and nasal septal suturing (NSS) after septoplasty. Methods Eighty patients who have nasal septal deviation and who otherwise are healthy were studied. Forty of these patients had finger glove NPs in their nasal cavities for 48 hours after septoplasty. Another 40 patients had NSS performed after septoplasty. Acoustic tympanometry and pH, PCO2, and PO2 analyses of arterial blood were performed preoperatively and 48 hours postoperatively. Results We observed a statistically significant increase in middle ear pressure (p < 0.001) and a significant reduction of PO2 (p < 0.001) and increase of PCO2 (p = 0.041) in the NP group but no difference in the NSS group, postoperatively. Conclusion NSS should be preferred as an alternative to intranasal packing.

Management of intertrochantric fractures with dynamic hip screw and trochanteric femoral nail - A prospective comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 65-71
Author(s):  
Sujana Theja J S ◽  
◽  
Kiran Marathe ◽  
B Gurumurthy ◽  
Pavankumar Patted ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Hip Screw

Comparative Study between Endoscopic Aided Septoplasty with Two Handed Technique using Endoholder and Conventional Septoplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Apar Pokharel ◽  
Naganawalachullu Jaya Prakash Mayya ◽  
Nabin Gautam
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Nasal Septum ◽  
Deviated Nasal Septum ◽  
Endoscopic Septoplasty ◽  
Septal Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Common Causes ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Evolutionary Step ◽  
One Year

Introduction: Deviated nasal septum is one of the most common causes for the nasal obstruction. The objective of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes in patients undergoing conventional septoplasty and endoscopic septoplasty in the management of deviated nasal septum. Methods:  Prospective comparative study was conducted on 60 patients who presented to the Department of ENT, College of Medical sciences, during a period of one year. The severity of the symptoms was subjectively assessed using NOSE score and objectively assessed using modified Gertner plate. Results: There was significant improvement in functional outcome like NOSE Score and area over the Gertner plate among patients who underwent endoscopic septoplasty. Significant difference in incidence of post-operative nasal synechae and haemorrhage was seen in conventional group compared to endoscopic group. Conclusions: Endoscopic surgery is an evolutionary step towards solving the problems related to deviated nasal septum. It is safe, effective and conservative, alternative to conventional septal surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document