Comparative analysis of Bricker versus Wallace ureteroenteric anastomosis and identification of predictors for postoperative ureteroenteric stricture

Purpose Ureteroenteric anastomosis after cystectomy is usually performed using the Bricker or Wallace technique. Deterioration of renal function is the most common long-term complication of urinary diversion (UD). To improve surgical care and optimize long-term renal function, we compared the Bricker and Wallace anastomotic techniques and identified risk factors for ureteroenteric strictures (UES) in patients after cystectomy. Material and methods Retrospective, monocentric analysis of 135 patients who underwent cystectomy with urinary diversion at the University Hospital Essen between January 2015 and June 2019. Pre- and postoperative renal function, relevant comorbidities, prior chemo- or radiotherapy, pathological findings, urinary diversion, postoperative complications, and ureteroenteric strictures (UES) were analyzed. Results Of all 135 patients, 69 (51.1%) underwent Bricker anastomosis and 66 (48.9%) Wallace anastomosis. Bricker and Wallace groups included 134 and 132 renal units, respectively. At a median follow-up of 14 (6–58) months, 21 (15.5%) patients and 30 (11.27%) renal units developed UES. We observed 22 (16.6%) affected renal units in Wallace versus 8 (5.9%) in Bricker group (p < 0.001). A bilateral stricture was most common in Wallace group (69.2%) (p < 0.001). Previous chemotherapy and 90-day Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications were independently associated with stricture formation, respectively (OR 9.74, 95% CI 2–46.2, p = 0.004; OR 4.01, 95% CI 1.36–11.82, p = 0.013). Conclusion The results of this study show no significant difference in ureteroenteric anastomotic techniques with respect to UES development regarding individual patients but suggest a higher risk of bilateral UES formation in patients undergoing Wallace anastomosis. This is reflected in the increased UES rate under consideration of the individual renal units.

O-OGC08 The Impact of Anastomotic Techniques on Post-operative Anastomotic Complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA)

Background The optimal anastomotic techniques in esophagectomy to minimize rates of anastomotic leakage (AL) and conduit necrosis (CN) are not known. The aim of this study was to assess whether anastomotic technique is associated with anastomotic failure after esophagectomy in the international Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) cohort. Methods This prospective observational multicenter cohort study included patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer over nine months in 2018. The primary exposure was the anastomotic technique, classified as handsewn, linear stapled or circular stapled. The primary outcome was a composite of AL and CN, as defined by the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to identify the strength of association between anastomotic techniques and anastomotic failure. Results Of the 2238 esophagectomies, the anastomosis was handsewn in 27.1%, linear stapled in 21.0% and circular stapled in 51.9%. Anastomotic techniques differed significantly between the anastomosis site (p &lt; 0.001), with the majority of neck anastomoses being handsewn (69.9%), whilst most chest anastomoses were stapled (66.3% circular stapled, 19.3% linear stapled). Rates of AL/CN differed significantly between the anastomotic techniques (p &lt; 0.001), from 19.3% in handsewn anastomoses, to 14.0% in linear stapled, and 12.1% in circular stapled. This was confirmed by multivariable analysis (Odds ratio (OR): 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46 - 0.86) for circular stapled vs. handsewn anastomosis. However, subgroup analysis by anastomosis site suggested that this effect was predominantly present in neck anastomoses, with AL/CN rates of 23.2% vs. 14.6% vs 5.9% for handsewn vs. linear stapled anastomoses vs circular stapled, compared to 13.7% vs. 13.8% vs 12.2% in chest anastomoses. Conclusions Handsewn anastomoses appear to be associated with higher rates of anastomotic failure for anastomoses in the neck. However, anastomotic failure rates in the chest were similar across techniques and there was no significant difference on multivariable analysis. Further research into standardization of approach and techniques may further improve outcomes.

V-OG01 Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: Technique of linear stapled anastomosis

Background Several anastomotic techniques have been described when performing an oesophagectomy. Each technique has its own merits and drawbacks. The stapled side to side technique creates a widely patent anastomosis with low stricture rate. Methods This video highlights the technique adopted and developed over the last 5 years. There are several key steps that need to be adhered to, to create a reliable, robust and reproducible anastomosis. These include the orientation of the oesophagus during transection, the use of mucosal retaining sutures, the use of a 34 bougie for the oesophagotomy and the correct retraction of the conduit when performing the anastomosis. Results The anastomosis was successfully performed without complications. Check endoscopy revealed a widely patent secure join. The anastomosis typically now takes 15–18 minutes. At the end of the procedure, the conduit cap was buried under the pleura and the anastomosis wrapped in omental fat. The patient was discharged on day 10 on a low residue diet. Conclusions This technique has been adopted and developed over the last 5 years. It has proved reliable and reproducible with a low stricture rate and a very low leak rate. It is easier to perform than a total hand sewn anastomosis and permits visualisation of the luminal oesophagus prior to anastomosis.

CYANOCRYLATE ADHESIVES IN FORMATION OF COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS

Data of foreign literature concerning sutureless formation of the colorectal anastomosiswith the help of cyonocrylate adhesives are presented in the article. These are quick acting glues, available on the Ukrainian market, and may be used by Ukrainiansurgeons in implementation of their ideas as to the sutureless connection of organs in theexperimental and clinical investigations.12 different types of cyanocrylate adhesives as to their resistance to the rupture of theconnected by them large intestine segments, were studied. Questions of the technicalformation of the sutureless anastomoses were considered. When substantially newtechnical devices for gluing together the organs are absent, progress is hardly possible.Objective – to acquaint the domestic surgeons and oncologists with modern achievementsof foreign scientists in the field of sutureless colorectal anastomosis formation by meansof cyanocrylate adhesives.Conclusions. For some time past foreign surgeons the problems of colorectal anastomosesintensively develop the problems of colorectal. This is due to the fact that indices ofcolorectal anastomosis insufficiency remain on high levels. Unfortunately, the hopesthat the introduction of modern advanced stapler anastomotic techniques can radicallyreduce the frequency of this complication were not justified.

Continuously sutured versus linear-stapled anastomosis in 76 robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomies

Objective We introduced robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomies (rob-E) using the da Vinci Xi in Oct. 2015. Two anastomotic techniques have been performed – continuously sutured (COSU) and linear-stapled (LIST). Aim of this study is to evaluate the two anastomotic techniques regarding perioperative outcomes in our experience. Methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data between Oct. 2015 and Dec. 2020 including 76 patients. 45 underwent COSU and 31 LIST. Techniques are demonstrated with video material. Minor (Clavien-Dindo &lt; = 3a) and major (Clavien-Dindo &gt; = 3b) morbidity, rate of anastomotic insufficiency, mortality, and duration of hospitalization were compared. Results Patient characteristics were as follows: median age of 69 (35-83) years in COSU and 70 (36-83) years in LIST (p = 0.575), male gender in 84.4% of COSU and 83.9% of LIST (p = 1.000), and physical status with American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3 in 62.2% of COSU and 67.7% of LIST (p = 0.771). Concerning tumor characteristics there were 91.1% adenocarcinomas in COSU and 96.8% in LIST (p = 0.642), whereas the others were squamous cell carcinomas and one neuroendocrine tumor in COSU. The tumors were stage II in 22.2% respectively 32.3% and stage III in 57.8% respectively 48.4% of COSU and LIST (p = 0.555). Comparison of minor morbidity occurring in 60.0% of COSU and 54.8% of LIST (p = 0.813), major morbidity in 8.9% respectively 16.1% (p = 0.473), incidence of anastomotic insufficiency in 8.9% of COSU and 6.5% of LIST (p = 1.000), rate of surgical reintervention necessary in 2.2% respectively 9.7% (p = 0.298) as well as mortality of 2.2% in COSU and 3.2% in LIST (p = 1.000) showed no difference. Median duration of hospitalization of 20 (13-49) days in COSU and 20 (14-62) in LIST (p = 0.423) did not differ. Conclusion In rob-E COSU and LIST show comparable results and a preferable technique cannot be determined yet. Our results do not support the results of previous reports (Cerfolio et al.) that demonstrated a superiority of LIST. While stapling the backside of the anastomosis in LIST impresses as an elegant way to overcome the surgical demanding part of the anastomosis, other disadvantages such as compromising perfusion of the gastric conduit may prevail and limit the benefits. Further studies with a larger cohort are planned in order to draw more decisive conclusions.