Contact diagnostics of the ionosphere and laboratory plasma

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 3-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.A. Shuvalov ◽  
◽  
A.I. Priymak ◽  
N.P. Reznichenko ◽  
N.A. Tokmak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Vol 101 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Ren ◽  
Masaaki Yamada ◽  
Hantao Ji ◽  
Stefan P. Gerhardt ◽  
Russell Kulsrud

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 082703
Author(s):  
J. T. Banasek ◽  
S. V. R. Rocco ◽  
W. M. Potter ◽  
E. S. Lavine ◽  
C. E. Seyler ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-219
Author(s):  
Andrea Mosca ◽  
Massimo Quercioli ◽  
Renata Paleari

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 062708
Author(s):  
J. T. Banasek ◽  
S. V. R. Rocco ◽  
W. M. Potter ◽  
E. S. Lavine ◽  
B. R. Kusse ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 367-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. F. Cramer ◽  
I. J. Donnelly

The resistive tearing mode instability is a mechanism that in some cases will render unstable a magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium of a plasma that is ideally stable, i.e. stable if no dissipative oiesses are taken into account. There is much experimental evidence that this instability is the cause of the current disruptions observed in laboratory plasma devices (von Goeler et al. 1974). In the astrophysical context, the instability has been invoked in connection with the solar flare energy release mechanism (Coppi and Friedland 1971) and the problem of the disconnection of the protostar matter from the interstellar magnetic field during star formation (Mestel 1966). In the latter problem the tearing instability gives rise to a much smaller timescale for magnetic reconnection than does ordinary resistive diffusion.


1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 544-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Colasanti ◽  
G. Arrigo ◽  
A. Santoro ◽  
S. Mandolfo ◽  
C. Tetta ◽  
...  

We tested a new biosensor for urea monitoring in the ultrafiltrate during PFD in a group of 5 hemodialyzed stable patients. The inspection of the UF-urea profile reflects the dynamical changes of the plasma urea concentration during diffusive dialysis and allows the fitting of the main mathematical models of urea kinetics. The biosensor efficiency was 98.4% on average (SD: 1.5%) at Uf fluxes varying from 45 to 55 ml/min (mean: 51 ml/min; SD: 3.2) and at Uf-urea concentrations varying from 23 to 165 mg/dl. The mean difference between Uf-urea determined by the laboratory method and Uf-urea assayed by the biosensor was -1.07 mg/dl and the 95% confidence interval ranged from -2.01 to 0.13 mg/dl. The mean difference between laboratory plasma urea and Uf-urea from the biosensor was on average -1.9 mg/dl and the estimated limits of agreement with a confidence of 95% were -3.16 and 0.64 mg/dl. Comparison between kinetic models and experimental profiles of plasma urea decrease, evaluations of recirculation and post-dialytic rebound, the role of Kt/V on-line during dialysis were the preliminary clinical applications of this biosensor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document