scholarly journals M. Hrushevskyi’s Publishing Activity in Kyiv in 1907-1914 As a Component of Hrushevskyi Studies: Epistolary and Journalistic Aspect

2021 ◽  
pp. 23-33
Author(s):  
I. Tkachenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
pp. 176-191

The article states the necessity of creating an economic chronicle of Alexander Pushkin’s life. His economic life includes four aspects: publishing activity, estate management, playing cards, and life in the city. It is mentioned that the existing literature lacks accurate data on Pushkin’s incomes and expenses. The article studies a notorious episode concerning Pushkin’s loan received from the Moscow Savings Treasury. It is shown that there are certain questions connected with distribution of the money received and with Pushkin’s deposit in the Moscow Savings Treasury. Besides, the article analyses Pushkin’s loans from the State Treasury. The role of Egor Kankrin, Minister of Finance, in providing to Pushkin his credit conditions, and the attitude of Emperor Nicholas I towards the poet are emphasized. They resulted in the lending conditions being extremely soft: the loans were long-term and interest-free. However, Pushkin still needed money and had to borrow large sums from private persons. After his death, debts to the State Treasury and to private persons amounted to 138,988 rubles 33 kopeks. The author raises the question: did Pushkin have a real opportunity to repay his debts? Data from a Pushkin Trust report concerning incomes collected from the posthumous edition are analyzed. The article provides calculations confirming that Pushkin’s financial bankruptcy was far from being inevitable. Had he survived after the duel with d’Anthès, Pushkin would have been exiled to his village. He would have continued his literary work and, according to the optimistic estimate, could have repaid his debts within approximately four years.


Ergodesign ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
Артур Алисов ◽  
Artur Alisov ◽  
Сергей Кондратенко ◽  
Sergey Kondratenko ◽  
Александр Кузьменко ◽  
...  

It is shown that in the modern world electronic journals become the main way of professional communication of specialists. The history of creation of electronic scientific journals and prospects of development of this direction of publishing activity are presented.


Author(s):  
O. Klymyshyn

The publishing activity of the museum for the whole period of its existence is analyzed, starting from the first published in the museum by V. Didushitsky in 1880 and up to 2018 inclusive. Approximately this work is about 3.5 thousand publications, among which 84 monographs; 35 issues of the scientific miscellany "Proceedings of the State Natural History Museum"; 5 issues of the book series "Scientific Collections of the State Natural History Museum"; more than 50 catalogs of museum collections, thematic miscellanies, qualifiers, dictionaries and guides; about 2.2 thousand scientific articles; about 1 thousand materials and abstracts of reports of scientific conferences, as well as dozens of popular scientific articles, brochures and booklets.


2020 ◽  
pp. 137-146
Author(s):  
Anatoliy Prokop'evich Chudinov ◽  
Lyudmila Viktorovna Khristolyubova ◽  
Anna Vladislavovna Tsygankova

Author(s):  
Jennifer Batt

This chapter explores the frantic burst of publishing activity that followed Queen Caroline’s patronage of Stephen Duck. This activity was instrumental in shaping how Duck and his work would be viewed during his life and beyond. Duck’s verse was initially published without his, or his patrons’, consent; as it quickly became a bestseller, it was followed onto the market by a slew of rival, pirated, and spurious pamphlets. Duck and his patrons had very little control over how work issued in his name was presented to the reading public, and, as this chapter reveals, their complaints very quickly became embroiled in a fiercely contested dispute about authority, authenticity, and accuracy. Duck’s patrons and supporters found it difficult to gain a hearing; their sincere statements were crowded out by competing assertions issued by energetic, innovative, and financially motivated booksellers and printers. As this chapter argues, the more that Duck’s supporters tried to object to the unauthorized reproduction of Duck’s verse, the more opportunities they created for others to raise doubts about Duck’s capabilities as a poet.


1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 944-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas S. Rebne ◽  
Naomi Berger Davidson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document