Diagnosis Coding

2020 ◽  
pp. 15-31
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
R. Berant ◽  
Y. Simon ◽  
L.D. Amir ◽  
P. Halpern ◽  
M. Mimouni ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  

Published annually and currently in its 21th edition, Coding for Pediatrics is the signature publication in a comprehensive suite of coding products offered by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). This AAP exclusive complements standard coding manuals with pediatric-specific documentation and billing solutions for pediatricians, nurse practitioners, administration staff, and pediatric coders. This year's edition has been fully updated and revised to include all changes to the 2016 Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®), complete with accompanying guidelines for their application. The numerous clinical vignettes and examples featured in the book, as well as the many coding pearls included throughout, have also been fully revised and revisited. Coding for Pediatrics, 2016 continues to provide guidance on ICD-10-CM transition including coding tips highlighting key conventions and documentation elements to support specific and accurate ICD-10-CM code selection. Other updates for this edition include Detailed information on new and revised CPT® codes for 2016 including Prolonged clinical staff time Removal of impacted cerumen with irrigation or lavage Revision of photo-screening services New chapter on enhanced quality and pay for performance Expanded coding resources including articles for the AAP Pediatric Coding Newsletter, coding fact sheets, sample appeal letter, denial tracking tool, and more All clinical vignettes presented with corresponding ICD-10-CM codes. Some included with valuable quality measure. Online access to many additional practice resources Table of Contents New and Revised CPT® Codes for 2016 Diagnosis Coding: ICD-10-CM Modifiers and Coding Edits Evaluation and Management Documentation (E/M) and Coding Guidelines: Incident-To, PATH Guidelines, and Scope of Practice Laws Preventive Services Evaluation and Management Services in the Office, Outpatient, Home, or Nursing Facility Setting Perinatal Counseling and Care of the Neonate Noncritical Hospital Evaluation and Management Services Emergency Department Services Critical Care and Intensive Care Evolving Evaluation and Management for Nonphysician Services Common Procedures and Non-E/M Medical Services Coding for Quality and Performance Measures\ Preventing Fraud and Abuse: Compliance, Audits, and Paybacks The Business of Medicine: From Clean Claims to Correct Payment and Emerging Payment Methodologies


JAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 324 (5) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
Cyrus M. Kosar ◽  
Lacey Loomer ◽  
Kali S. Thomas ◽  
Elizabeth M. White ◽  
Orestis A. Panagiotou ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1825-1829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margareta Eriksson ◽  
Anna Nilsson ◽  
Rutger Bennet

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. A24
Author(s):  
KM Moore ◽  
S Andrade ◽  
A Cassidy-Bushrow ◽  
S Dublin ◽  
R Greenlee ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-147
Author(s):  
Qisthi Qurrota A’yuni ◽  
Kori Puspita Ningsih

Background: The implementation of diagnosis coding in the Medical Record Unit at a health institution plays an important role in the administration of medical records at the hospital because it describes the quality management of medical records. In order to maintain the quality, it is crucial to accomplish the accreditation standard, especially at ICM. 13 related coding. Objective: This study aimed to understand the procedures of implementation, compliance disease diagnosis code execution in an outpatient based on accreditation standards KARS 2012, the percentage and the resistance of diagnosis coding implementation in outpatients. Methods: This research was a descriptive qualitative approach with cross sectional design. The subjects were medical records staff with Diploma 3 medical record education background, outpatients coding officer, reporting coordinator, the head of clinic space and a clinic nurse. The data collectin techniques used were observation, documentation and interview studies. Testing the validity of the data use triangulate of source and triangulate of techniq. Results: The coding was done by the medical records staffs and nurses, coding reference were in the form of policies, guidelines and standard operating procedure, guidelines used by nurses in coding was assistive book. Tugurejo Hospital Accreditation in Central Java province had fulfilled the five elements of ICM. 13 and passed the accreditation of type B-level plenary meeting. The percentage of outpatient coding implementation reached 78.6%, consisting of JKN amounted to 75.4% and 3.2% were non JKN. The barriers of coding implementation consists of five elements such as man, method, material, machine and money. Conclusion: In general the implementation of the coding in JKN outpatient has already done optimally, but for non JKN has not been optimal because of the inhibiting factors such as man, method, material, machine and money. Keywords: Coding, disease diagnosis, outpatient


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document