diagnosis coding
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

62
(FIVE YEARS 18)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Hughes ◽  
Becky Dolan

For pediatric provider, coder, and biller, here's the most helpful and easy-to-use manual on ICD-10-CM yet. Featuring a laser-sharp pediatric focus, it provides codes and guidelines in a simplified yet familiar format. The combination of hallmark features and easy-to-use format makes facing the challenge of accurate diagnosis coding easier. https://shop.aap.org/pediatric-icd-10-cm-2022-7th-edition-paperback


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 825-833
Author(s):  
Rebecca R.S. Clark ◽  
Rachel French ◽  
Scott Lorch ◽  
Kathleen O’Rourke ◽  
Kathleen E. Fitzpatrick Rosenbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Nafiseh Hosseini ◽  
Khalil Kimiafar ◽  
Sayyed Mostafa Mostafavi ◽  
Behzad Kiani ◽  
Kazem Zendehdel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (Supplement_5) ◽  
pp. S437-S441
Author(s):  
David de Gijsel ◽  
Martha DesBiens ◽  
Elizabeth A Talbot ◽  
David J Laflamme ◽  
Stephen Conn ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Healthcare systems and public health agencies use different methods to measure the impact of substance use (SU) on population health. We studied the ability of systems to accurately capture data on drug use-associated infective endocarditis (DUA-IE). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with IE discharge diagnosis from an academic medical center, 2011–2017, comparing data from hospital Electronic Health Record (EHR) to State Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set (UHDDS). To identify SU we developed a composite measure. Results EHR identified 472 IE discharges (430 of these were captured in UHDDS); 406 (86.0%) were correctly coded based on chart review. IE discharges increased from 57 to 92 (62%) from 2012 to 2017. Hospitalizations for the subset of DUA-IE identified by any measure of SU increased from 10 to 54 (440%). Discharge diagnosis coding identified 128 (60.7%) of total DUA-IE hospitalizations. The composite measure identified an additional 65 (30.8%) DUA-IE hospitalizations and chart review an additional 18 (8.5%). Conclusions The failure of discharge diagnosis coding to identify DUA-IE in 40% of hospitalizations demonstrates the need for better systems to capture the impact of SU. Collaborative data sharing could help improve surveillance responsiveness to address an emerging public health crises.


2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982094691
Author(s):  
Shawn M Gage ◽  
Heidi Reichert

Introduction: Hemodialysis access complications are common. We hypothesize that many of these complications can be traced back to needle-related injury from routine cannulation practices or inadvertent cannulation injuries. We set out to compare the rates of hemodialysis access complications under prior and current diagnosis coding systems, determine the incidence of needle-related complications for hemodialysis access, and describe the association of needle-related complications and resulting interventions. Methods: Arteriovenous graft and arteriovenous fistula placements occurring in the first 6 months of 2014 and 2016 were identified in the United States Renal Data System Medicare claims data. Placements were followed until end of hemodialysis access life or end of the calendar year. Diagnoses and resulting interventions occurring during placement life were identified and mapped to needle-related complication terms. Results: Almost 30,000 placements for 27,000 patients were followed in each year, with 67% of all accesses placed being arteriovenous fistula and 33% arteriovenous graft. In both years, 75% of arteriovenous fistulae and arteriovenous grafts required one or more interventions. Stenosis and thrombosis were the most common complications diagnosed and treated (41% and 16%, respectively); however, potential needle-related complications accounted for 6% of this dataset. Discussion: International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, was inadequate for determining the incidence of specific hemodialysis access complications or needle-related complications. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, introduced several more hemodialysis access diagnoses but is still subject to coding confusion and catch-all coding for a variety of common and otherwise well-defined complications, suggesting that the true incidence of needle-related complications is buried in the non-specific diagnosis codes. These findings mark the clear need for an improved diagnosis coding system that consistently represents all common hemodialysis access complications.


JAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 324 (5) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
Cyrus M. Kosar ◽  
Lacey Loomer ◽  
Kali S. Thomas ◽  
Elizabeth M. White ◽  
Orestis A. Panagiotou ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-7
Author(s):  
G. A. Aleksandrova ◽  
D. Sh. Vaysman

Aim. For the purpose of ensuring the reliability of national mortality statistics, the present regulations set out to generalize current information on the preparation of primary medical documentation on the basis of requirements for filing death certificates, ICD-10 rules and recommendations by the Russian Ministry of Health.Material and methods. Existing requirements for filing death certificates, ICD-10 rules updated by WHO in 1996–2019 and recommendations by the Russian Ministry of Health were analysed.Results. The preparation of primary medical documentation, formulation of the concluding clinical, pathological, anatomical and forensic post-mortem diagnosis, issuance of death certificates, selection and coding of the primary cause of death should be carried out in accordance with the unified ICD-10 rules. Postmortem diagnosis should correspond to Volume 3 of ICD-10.Due to the pandemic of a new coronavirus infection, referred to as COVID-19, in 2019, WHO introduced changes to the ICD-10. COVID-19 was included in ICD-10 chapter XXII and received the codes of U07.1 and U07.2. COVID-19-accosiated deaths were divided into those where COVID-19 is determined to be the primary cause of death and those where COVID-19 falls into the category “other” causes.COVID-19 with fatal complications is most frequently selected as the primary cause of death in acute conditions, with concurrent chronic diseases (cancer, diabetes, chronic forms of ischemic and cerebrovascular diseases, etc.) being indicated as “other” causes of death in Part II of the death certificate. In the presence of trauma, poisoning, bleeding and conditions requiring emergency medical care, these conditions are selected as the primary cause of death, with COVID-19 being recorded in part II of the certificate.Conclusion. To provide reliable statistical information about mortality rates, executive authorities require the primary medical documentation filed in strict accordance with established rules. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-47
Author(s):  
Sayati Mandia ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Icd 10 ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document