The Experiences of Children Enrolled in Pediatric Oncology Research: Implications for Assent

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. e876-e883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Unguru ◽  
A. M. Sill ◽  
N. Kamani
2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-73
Author(s):  
Jami S. Gattuso ◽  
Elizabeth A. Gilger ◽  
Georgette Chammas ◽  
Samuel Maceri ◽  
Nancy K. West ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 1337-1344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Aristizabal ◽  
Jenelle Singer ◽  
Renee Cooper ◽  
Kristen J. Wells ◽  
Jesse Nodora ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-73
Author(s):  
Jami S. Gattuso ◽  
Elizabeth A. Gilger ◽  
Georgette Chammas ◽  
Samuel Maceri ◽  
Nancy K. West ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 436-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Machado Silva-Rodrigues ◽  
Pamela S. Hinds ◽  
Lucila Castanheira Nascimento

Symptom management knowledge is a priority for pediatric oncology nursing research. Theories and models can frame the studies of symptoms experienced during childhood cancer. This article describes and analyzes the middle-range theory, theory of unpleasant symptoms (TOUS), for its conceptual and empirical fit with pediatric oncology nursing based on its current use in adult oncology research and its limited use to date in pediatric oncology. Searches in PubMed and CINAHL databases using the keywords theory of unpleasant symptoms and cancer and covering the time period 2000 to 2017 yielded 103 abstracts for review. Twenty published reports met eligibility criteria for review; only one included pediatric oncology patients. No study to date has tested all the components of the TOUS in pediatrics. The TOUS component of performance appears to be underaddressed across completed studies that instead include a focus on patient-reported quality of life rather than on perceived behavioral or performance indicators concurrent with the subjective symptom reports. Additionally, the influence of family, essential in pediatric oncology, is absent in the majority of studies guided by the TOUS. The TOUS is a structurally complicated framework that would be a conceptual fit for pediatric oncology if family influence and perceived function were included. Studies across this population and guided by the TOUS are needed, although testing all the theorized linkages in the TOUS would likely require a large sample size of patients and, thereby, multisite approaches given that cancer is a rare disease in childhood.


2019 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Norma Araceli López-Facundo ◽  
Liliana Velasco-Hidalgo ◽  
Farina Esther Arreguín-González ◽  
Daniel Ortiz-Morales ◽  
Mayra López-Ruiz ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 492-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avram E. Denburg ◽  
Steven Joffe ◽  
Sumit Gupta ◽  
Scott C. Howard ◽  
Raul C. Ribeiro ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Celia B. Fisher ◽  
Jessica K. Masty

The ethics of informed consent in pediatric cancer research are unique. First, unlike medical care for most other diseases of childhood, the majority of children with cancer receive treatment through participation in pediatric oncology research or in hospital settings in which such research is actively conducted (Ablett & Pinkerton, 2003; Aleksa & Koren, 2002; Bleyer, 2002; Ross, Severson, Pollock, & Robison, 1996). Second, for children with newly diagnosed cancers, decisions regarding entry into a clinical protocol typically occur soon after the family is informed about the initial diagnosis. Thus, in many instances consent to research participation occurs during one of the most stressful periods in a family’s life. Third, because treatment decisions must be made very quickly after the initial diagnosis, there may be little opportunity for patients or parents to understand or accept the nature of the disease at the time their consent to research participation is sought. Like other diseases of childhood for which treatments found efficacious for adults may be ineffective or toxic, the absence of pediatric research can deprive pediatric cancer patients of empirically valid therapies. Patient advocates and pediatric oncologists view the imperative of conducting pediatric cancer research with particular urgency because of the life-threatening nature of the disease and the adverse, and sometimes permanent, side effects of many current treatments. Thus, because the cancer patient’s immediate treatment needs are so entwined with the research imperative, a fourth unique aspect of informed consent to pediatric oncology research is that treatment and research goals may be blurred not only by patients and parents but also by investigators, clinicians, and other care providers (Kodish et al., 1998). Interpreting broadly worded federal regulations governing research involving children also provides challenges for developing patient- and family-appropriate consent procedures for pediatric oncology research. In most instances, federal regulations require that adequate provisions be made for soliciting the permission of parents/guardians and the child’s assent (the child’s affirmative agreement to participate in research) prior to conducting research involving children (Department of Health and Human Services, 2001, 45 CFR 46.408; Food and Drug Administration [FDA] 2001, 21 CFR 50.55).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document