Global Health Education in US Pediatric Residency Programs

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. X6-X6
PEDIATRICS ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 458-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Butteris ◽  
C. J. Schubert ◽  
M. Batra ◽  
R. J. Coller ◽  
L. C. Garfunkel ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Castillo ◽  
Heidi Castillo ◽  
Thomas G DeWitt

Abstract Background A new generation of medical students is seeking residency programs offering global health education (GHE), and there is growing awareness of the benefits this training provides. However, basic factors that have an impact on its implementation and its effect on the residency match are insufficiently understood. The purpose of this study was to explore the extent of online information on GHE available to potential US pediatric residency program applicants. Methods Pediatric residency programs' websites were systematically examined in 2007, 2008, and 2009 to extract available information on GHE. Results In 2007, 147 websites (76.2%) had no information available on GHE; 40 (20.7%) mentioned international opportunities; and 6 (3.1%) provided evidence of a global health track or program. In 2008, 123 websites (63.1%) had no information available on GHE; 57 (29.2%) mentioned international opportunities; and 15 (7.7%) had a formal program. In 2009, 105 websites (53.6%) had no information available on GHE; 70 (35.7%) mentioned international opportunities; and 21 (10.7%) had a formal program. Between 2007 and 2009, the percentage of pediatric residency programs with information on GHE available nearly doubled from 23.8% to 46.4%. Within the same period, the number of formal GHE programs offered more than tripled. Conclusions By the 2009–2010 academic year, the websites for nearly half of the residency programs mentioned international experiences, yet only a small number of these residencies appeared to have developed a formal GHE program. Further, the websites for many residency programs did not include information on the international opportunities they offered, with programs running the risk of failing to attract and ultimately match global health–minded applicants.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupa R. Patel ◽  
Sandhiya Ravichandran ◽  
Michelle M. Doering ◽  
Angela C. Hardi

MedEdPublish ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kriti Puri ◽  
Jonathan Castillo ◽  
Heidi Castillo ◽  
Jareen Meinzen-Derr ◽  
Charles Schubert

2019 ◽  
Vol 153 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-379
Author(s):  
Emily H Glynn ◽  
Jeannette Guarner ◽  
Allison Hall ◽  
Ann M Nelson ◽  
Linda R Andiric ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives This study assessed the prevalence, general interest, and barriers to implementing global health curricula in pathology residency programs. Methods We conducted a survey of 166 US pathology residency programs. Results Thirty-two (195) of 166 programs responded. Of these, 13% have a formalized global health program (n = 4), and the majority indicated at least some general interest in global health among trainees (88%, n = 28) and faculty (94%, n = 30), albeit at a low to moderate level. Funding limitations, regulatory constraints, and insufficient knowledge of global health were frequently cited barriers to developing a global health program. Conclusions Few US pathology departments incorporate global health education into postgraduate training. The importance of pathology in global health has been underappreciated, despite its critical role in the delivery of health care in resource-limited settings. One solution is for pathology departments to expand global health educational opportunities for trainees.


2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 847-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Havryliuk ◽  
Suzanne Bentley ◽  
Sigrid Hahn

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 367A-367A
Author(s):  
Kriti Puri ◽  
Heidi Castillo ◽  
Charles J Schubert ◽  
Jonathan Porter Castillo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document