scholarly journals A maradványhallás megőrzésének lehetőségei cochlearis implantáció során Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar elektródasorral

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (41) ◽  
pp. 1680-1688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Nagy ◽  
János András Jarabin ◽  
Balázs Dimák ◽  
Ádám Perényi ◽  
Ferenc Tóth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Basilar Membrane ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Spiral Ganglion ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Residual Hearing

Abstract: During the rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients, the preservation of residual acoustic hearing following cochlear implantation by minimizing the implantation trauma allows for improved hearing performance. To achieve this, minimally invasive, soft surgery methods and thinner, atraumatic electrodes were required. In our present study, we reported a case where Cochlear® Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode was implanted in a patient with residual hearing. Our aim was to study the possible preservation of postoperative acoustic residual hearing by audiological monitoring. Since childhood, due to her congenital hearing loss, she has been wearing a conventional, airborne hearing correction device on both ears. Six months before cochlear implantation, we measured the progression on both sides of the hearing loss, so we decided to perform cochlear implantation. The patient had residual hearing on both ears prior to surgery thus the Cochlear® Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar Implant was used. The minimally invasive surgery was performed on the patient’s right ear through the round window approach. Compared to the preoperative hearing threshold (average 85 dBHL) in the 4th postoperative week, an initial hearing threshold progression of 20–25 dBHL was observed between 0.25 and 1.0 kHz, while of 5–10 dBHL between 2.0–4.0 kHz. Hearing threshold measured in the 6th month showed a slight progression in the range above 1 kHz, but improved by the 12th month, to the results achieved at the 4th week. The effects of cochlear implantation on residual hearing have been studied in numerous studies, in which several key surgical and technical factors have been identified. Nucleus CI532 is a Slim Modiolar electrode profile that is close to the modiolus, so it is expected to have a lower endocochlear hydrodynamic load since it lies in the covering of the osseus spiral lamina, thus less influencing the dynamics of the basilar membrane. However, the perimodiolar location of the electrode array allows the adjacent nerve elements of the spiral ganglion to be stimulated with a lower electrical intensity and a reduced surface that may be neuroprotective. Preservation of acoustic residual hearing following cochlear implantation improves the patient’s speech perception and the sound localization skills, particularly in difficult circumstances. Long-term residual hearing preservation may also be of great importance in the subsequent feasibility for regenerative procedures and drug treatments. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(41): 1680–1688.

scholarly journals Evaluating cochlear insertion trauma and hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CIPRES): A study protocol for a randomised single blind controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Jwair ◽  
Ralf Boerboom ◽  
Huib Versnel ◽  
Robert Stokroos ◽  
Hans Thomeer
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Residual Hearing ◽  
Structure Preservation ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract BackgroundIn order to preserve residual hearing in patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who receive a cochlear implant (CI), insertion trauma to the delicate structures of the cochlea needs to be minimized. The surgical approach comprises the conventional mastoidectomy-posterior tympanotomy (MPT) to arrive at the middle ear, followed by either a cochleostomy (CO) or the round window (RW) approach. Both techniques have their benefits and disadvantages. Another important aspect in structure preservation is the design of the electrode array. Two different designs are used: a ‘straight’ lateral wall lying electrode array (LW), or a ‘pre-curved’ perimodiolar lying electrode array (PM). Interestingly, until now, the best surgical approach and design of the implant is uncertain. Our hypothesis is that the combination of a RW approach and a LW lying electrode array minimizes insertion trauma, leading to better hearing outcome for SNHL patients. MethodsWe designed a monocenter, 2x2, randomized controlled trial to compare insertion trauma between four groups of patients, with each group having a unique combination of electrode array type (LW or PM) and surgical approach (RW or CO). In total, 48 patients will be randomized into one of these four intervention groups. Our primary objective is comparison of postoperative hearing preservation between these four groups. Secondly, we aim to assess structure preservation (i.e., scalar transposition, with basilar membrane disruption or tip fold-over of array) for each group. Thirdly, we will compare objective outcomes of hearing and structure preservation by way of electrocochleography (ECochG).DiscussionCochlear implantation by way of a cochleostomy or round window approach, using different electrode array types, is the standard medical care for patients with severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, as it is a relative simple and low-risk procedure that greatly benefits patients. However, loss of residual hearing remains a problem. This trial is the first randomized controlled trial that evaluates the effect of cochlear insertion trauma of several CI treatment options on hearing preservation. Trial registrationThis trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) (www.trialregister.nl): NL8586, date of registration: 4th of May 2020. Retrospectively registered; 3/48 participants were included before registration.

Cochlear implant placement: round window approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (v1supplement) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas D. Backous
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Residual Hearing ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Single Sided Deafness ◽  
Window Approach

The indications for cochlear implantation continue to extend to patients with increased levels of residual hearing. Single-sided deafness and tinnitus are currently under various clinical trials as even further expansion of the application of cochlear implant device and programming technology is underway. This video details a round window and hearing preservation approach for cochlear implant placement, and incorporates the most recent advances in surgical technique.The video can be found here: http://youtu.be/bDqkbboXrU4.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Intracochlear Trauma Caused by Insertion of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays through Different Quadrants of the Round Window

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graziela de Souza Queiroz Martins ◽  
Rubens Vuono Brito Neto ◽  
Robinson Koji Tsuji ◽  
Eloisa Maria Mello Santiago Gebrim ◽  
Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Round Window Membrane ◽  
Residual Hearing ◽  
Electrode Arrays ◽  
Minimal Trauma ◽  
Electrode Insertion ◽  
Temporal Bones

Hypothesis. This study aimed to evaluate whether there is a difference in the degree of intracochlear trauma when the cochlear implant electrode arrays is inserted through different quadrants of the round window membrane.Background. The benefits of residual hearing preservation in cochlear implant recipients have promoted the development of atraumatic surgeries. Minimal trauma during electrode insertion is crucial for residual hearing preservation.Methods. In total, 25 fresh human temporal bones were subjected to mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy. The cochlear implant electrode array was inserted through the anterosuperior quadrant of the round window membrane in 50% of the bones and through the anteroinferior quadrant in the remaining 50%. The temporal bones were dehydrated, embedded in epoxy, serially polished, stained, viewed through a stereomicroscope, and photographed with the electrode arraysin situ. The resulting images were analyzed for signs of intracochlear trauma.Results. Histological examinations revealed varying degrees of damage to the intracochlear structures, although the incidence and severity of intracochlear trauma were not influenced by the quadrant of insertion.Conclusions. The incidence and severity of intracochlear trauma were similar in all samples, irrespective of electrode array insertion through the anterosuperior or anteroinferior quadrant of the round window membrane.

scholarly journals Comparison of residual hearing preservation and auditory based performance after paediatric cochlear implantation by round window insertion versus cochleostomy technique: an ambispective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1455
Author(s):  
Dayana Antony ◽  
Aneena Chacko ◽  
Ravi A.
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Sensorineural Deafness ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Residual Hearing ◽  
Round Window Insertion

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Cochlear implantation (CI) has revolutionized the treatment of sensorineural deafness. The aim of the study was to compare auditory based performance in cochlear implants who underwent round window insertion and cochleostomy.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Ambispective cohort study was done among the children who underwent perilingual cochlear implant in a tertiary care hospital for period of 1 year. Children who satisfied the inclusion criteria were selected and randomly subdivided into 2 groups: group A- round window insertion and group B-cochleostomy. Pre- and post-operative pure tone average (PTA) and residual hearing preserved were evaluated among the cochleostomy and round window insertion groups separately. Post-operatively, children were evaluated, from three months to 1 year from the activation of cochlear implant, with the use of scores such as Category of Auditory Performance (CAP), Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), Speech Intelligibility rating (SIR) and Meaningful use of speech scale (MUSS score) to measure speech production skills by auditory verbal therapist.   </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 80 patients were included in the study. Complete hearing preservation (within 10 dB) was significantly high in round window insertion group compared to   cochleostomy technique (p&lt;0.001). None the subjects had complete loss of residual hearing. On evaluating the post CI performance, MAIS score in the round window insertion group (9.34, 18.21, 27.79) were significantly better compared to cochleostomy group during the 3 months, 6 months and 12 months follow-up.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Round window insertion technique is significantly more successful in complete hearing preservation at low frequencies compared to cochleostomy technique. Among the auditory scores, only MAIS in the round window insertion group was found to be significantly better compared to cochleostomy group.</p>

Residual hearing preservation after cochlear implantation via round window or cochleostomy approach

2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (7) ◽  
pp. 1715-1719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuan-Hung Sun ◽  
Chuan-Jen Hsu ◽  
Peir-Rong Chen ◽  
Hung-Pin Wu
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Residual Hearing

Preservation of residual hearing following cochlear implantation: comparison between three surgical techniques

2007 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Berrettini ◽  
F Forli ◽  
S Passetti
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Lateral Wall ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Residual Hearing ◽  
Electrode Arrays ◽  
Electrode Insertion

AbstractThe preservation of residual hearing is becoming a high priority in cochlear implant surgery. It allows better speech understanding and ensures long-lasting and stable performance; it also allows the possibility, in selected cases, of combining electro-acoustic stimulation in the same ear.We present the results of a retrospective study of the conservation of residual hearing in three different groups of patients who had undergone cochlear implantation using three different cochlear implant electrode arrays, combined with three different surgical techniques for the cochleostomy. The study aimed to evaluate which approach allowed greater preservation of residual hearing.The best residual hearing preservation results (i.e. preservation in 81.8 per cent of patients) were achieved with the Contour Advance electrode array, using the Advance Off-Stylet technique and performing a modified anterior inferior cochleostomy; this combination enabled reduced trauma to the lateral wall of the cochlea during electrode insertion.

Conductive Component After Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Residual Hearing Conservation

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Chole ◽  
Timothy E. Hullar ◽  
Lisa G. Potts
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Residual Hearing ◽  
Conductive Component ◽  
Conductive Hearing ◽  
New Onset

Purpose Changes in auditory thresholds following cochlear implantation are generally assumed to be due to damage to neural elements. Theoretical studies have suggested that placement of a cochlear implant can cause a conductive hearing loss. Identification of a conductive component following cochlear implantation could guide improvements in surgical techniques or device designs. The purpose of this study is to characterize new-onset conductive hearing losses after cochlear implantation. Method In a prospective study, air- and bone-conduction audiometric testing were completed on cochlear implant recipients. An air–bone gap equal to or greater than 15 dB HL at 2 frequencies determined the presence of a conductive component. Results Of the 32 patients with preoperative bone-conduction hearing, 4 patients had a new-onset conductive component resulting in a mixed hearing loss, with air-conduction thresholds ranging from moderate to profound and an average air–bone gap of 30 dB HL. One had been implanted through the round window, 2 had an extended round window, and 1 had a separate cochleostomy. Conclusions Loss of residual hearing following cochlear implantation may be due in part to a conductive component. Identifying the mechanism for this conductive component may help minimize hearing loss. Postoperative hearing evaluation should measure both air- and bone-conduction thresholds.

scholarly journals Evaluating cochlear insertion trauma and hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CIPRES): a study protocol for a randomized single-blind controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Jwair ◽  
Ralf A. Boerboom ◽  
Huib Versnel ◽  
Robert J. Stokroos ◽  
Hans G. X. M. Thomeer
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Round Window ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Residual Hearing ◽  
Structure Preservation ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background In order to preserve residual hearing in patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who receive a cochlear implant (CI), insertion trauma to the delicate structures of the cochlea needs to be minimized. The surgical approach comprises the conventional mastoidectomy-posterior tympanotomy (MPT) to arrive at the middle ear, followed by either a cochleostomy (CO) or the round window (RW) approach. Both techniques have their benefits and disadvantages. Another important aspect in structure preservation is the design of the electrode array. Two different designs are used: a “straight” lateral wall lying electrode array (LW) or a “pre-curved” perimodiolar lying electrode array (PM). Interestingly, until now, the best surgical approach and design of the implant is uncertain. Our hypothesis is that there is a difference in hearing preservation outcomes between the four possible treatment options. Methods We designed a monocenter, multi-arm, randomized controlled trial to compare insertion trauma between four groups of patients, with each group having a unique combination of an electrode array type (LW or PM) and surgical approach (RW or CO). In total, 48 patients will be randomized into one of these four intervention groups. Our primary objective is the comparison of postoperative hearing preservation between these four groups. Secondly, we aim to assess structure preservation (i.e., scalar translocation, with basilar membrane disruption or tip fold-over of array) for each group. Thirdly, we will compare objective outcomes of hearing and structure preservation by way of electrocochleography (ECochG). Discussion Cochlear implantation by way of a cochleostomy or round window approach, using different electrode array types, is the standard medical care for patients with severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, as it is a relatively simple and low-risk procedure that greatly benefits patients. However, loss of residual hearing remains a problem. This trial is the first randomized controlled trial that evaluates the effect of cochlear insertion trauma of several CI treatment options on hearing preservation. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) NL8586. Registered on 4 May 2020. Retrospectively registered; 3/48 participants were included before registration.

scholarly journals Semiautomatic Cochleostomy Target and Insertion Trajectory Planning for Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implantation

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilhelm Wimmer ◽  
Frederic Venail ◽  
Tom Williamson ◽  
Mohamed Akkari ◽  
Nicolas Gerber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Basilar Membrane ◽  
Electrode Array ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Scala Tympani ◽  
Clinical Imaging ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Surface Models ◽  
Scala Vestibuli

A major component of minimally invasive cochlear implantation is atraumatic scala tympani (ST) placement of the electrode array. This work reports on a semiautomatic planning paradigm that uses anatomical landmarks and cochlear surface models for cochleostomy target and insertion trajectory computation. The method was validated in a human whole head cadaver model (n=10ears). Cochleostomy targets were generated from an automated script and used for consecutive planning of a direct cochlear access (DCA) drill trajectory from the mastoid surface to the inner ear. An image-guided robotic system was used to perform both, DCA and cochleostomy drilling. Nine of 10 implanted specimens showed complete ST placement. One case of scala vestibuli insertion occurred due to a registration/drilling error of 0.79 mm. The presented approach indicates that a safe cochleostomy target and insertion trajectory can be planned using conventional clinical imaging modalities, which lack sufficient resolution to identify the basilar membrane.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document