The insulin-like growth factor system: IGFs, IGF-binding proteins and IGFBP-proteases

2005 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lelbach ◽  
Gy. Muzes ◽  
J. Feher
2000 ◽  
Vol 278 (6) ◽  
pp. E967-E976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Baxter

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins (IGFBPs) are a family of six homologous proteins with high binding affinity for IGF-I and IGF-II. Information from NMR and mutagenesis studies is advancing knowledge of the key residues involved in these interactions. IGF binding may be modulated by IGFBP modifications, such as phosphorylation and proteolysis, and by cell or matrix association of the IGFBPs. All six IGFBPs have been shown to inhibit IGF action, but stimulatory effects have also been established for IGFBP-1, -3, and -5. These generally involve a decrease in IGFBP affinity and may require cell association of the IGFBP, but precise mechanisms are unknown. The same three IGFBPs have well established effects that are independent of type I IGF receptor signaling. IGFBP-1 exerts these effects by signaling through α5β1-integrin, whereas IGFBP-3 and -5 may have specific cell-surface receptors with serine kinase activity. The regulation of cell sensitivity to inhibitory IGFBP signaling may play a role in the growth control of malignant cells.


1993 ◽  
Vol 293 (3) ◽  
pp. 713-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
G L Francis ◽  
S E Aplin ◽  
S J Milner ◽  
K A McNeil ◽  
F J Ballard ◽  
...  

Recombinant insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) and two structural analogues, des(1-6)IGF-II and [Arg6]-IGF-II, were produced to investigate the role of N-terminal residues in binding to IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) and hence the biological properties of the modified peptides. The growth factors were modelled on two previously characterized variants of IGF-I, des(1-3)IGF-I and [Arg3]-IGF-I, which both show substantially decreased binding to IGFBPs and were expressed as fusion proteins in Escherichia coli. The biological activities of the corresponding analogues of IGF-I and IGF-II were compared in rat L6 myoblasts and H35B hepatoma cells. In the L6-myoblast protein-synthesis assay, the IGF-II analogues, des(1-6)IGF-II and [Arg6]-IGF-II, were slightly more potent than IGF-II but about 10-fold less potent than IGF-I and 100-fold less potent than the respective IGF-I analogues, des(1-3)IGF-I and [Arg3]IGF-I. In H35 hepatoma cells the anabolic response measured was the inhibition of protein breakdown, and the potency order was insulin >>> [Arg3]-IGF-I > des(1-3)IGF-I > [Arg6]-IGF-II > des(1-6)IGF-II > IGF-I > IGF-II. Binding of the IGFs and their analogues to the type 1 IGF receptor in L6 myoblasts and to the insulin receptor in H35 hepatoma cells did not fully explain the observed anabolic potency differences. Moreover, binding of all four analogues to the IGFBPs secreted by L6 myoblasts and H35B hepatoma cells was greatly decreased compared with the parent IGF. We conclude that the observed anabolic response to each IGF was determined by their relative binding to the competing cell receptor and IGFBP binding sites present.


1997 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin G. Scanes ◽  
Robert C. Thommes ◽  
Steven V. Radecki ◽  
Frances C. Buonomo ◽  
James E. Woods

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document