scholarly journals Gender differences in women’s health and maternity care training: A scoping review

MedEdPublish ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanja Kostov ◽  
Sudha Koppula ◽  
Oksana Babenko
2021 ◽  
pp. 089011712110113
Author(s):  
Jessica R. Thompson ◽  
Lauren R. Risser ◽  
Madeline N. Dunfee ◽  
Nancy E. Schoenberg ◽  
Jessica G. Burke

Objective: Appalachian women continue to die younger than in other US regions. We performed a rapid scoping review to summarize women’s health research in Appalachia from 2000 to 2019, including health topics, study populations, theoretical frameworks, methods, and findings. Data Source: We searched bibliographic databases (eg, PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar) for literature focusing on women’s health in Appalachia. Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Included articles were: (1) on women’s health in Appalachia; (2) published January 2000 to June 2019; (3) peer-reviewed; and (4) written in English. We excluded studies without reported data findings. Data Extraction: Two coders reviewed articles for descriptive information to create summary tables comparing variables of interest. Data Synthesis: Two coders co-reviewed a sub-sample to ensure consensus and refine data charting categories. We categorized major findings across the social-ecological framework. Results: A search of nearly 2 decades of literature revealed 81 articles, which primarily focused on cancer disparities (49.4%) and prenatal/pregnancy outcomes (23.5%). Many of these research studies took place in Central Appalachia (eg, 42.0% in Kentucky) with reproductive or middle-aged women (82.7%). Half of the studies employed quantitative methods, and half used qualitative methods, with few mixed method or community-engaged approaches (3.7%). Nearly half (40.7%) did not specify a theoretical framework. Findings included complex multi-level factors with few articles exploring the co-occurrence of factors across multiple levels. Conclusions: Future studies should: 1) systematically include Appalachian women at various life stages from under-represented sub-regions; 2) expand the use of rigorous methods and specified theoretical frameworks to account for complex interactions of social-ecological factors; and 3) build upon existing community assets to improve health in this vulnerable population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 654
Author(s):  
Ai-Lien Le ◽  
Sarah Visintini ◽  
Peter Tugwell ◽  
Jennifer Petkovic ◽  
Beverley Shea ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lourdes Pérez González

<p>Análisis de las diferencias de género en la medicalización —entendida como la apropiación de parcelas de la vida cotidiana por el ámbito médico/farmacéutico— y sus repercusiones en la vida y la salud de las mujeres. Este análisis utiliza como referencia fundamental el Vademécum, base de datos que nos ha permitido la búsqueda de los fármacos (centrándonos en los efectos adversos y las interacciones) que se expiden sin receta y están destinados fundamentalmente, o únicamente, a las mujeres ―sanas<br /><br />Analysis of gender differences in medicalization - understood as the appropriation of daily life areas by the medical/pharmaceutical field - and their impact on women’s health and lives. This study relies on the Vademecum as the main reference, database that has allowed us the search of drugs (focusing on the adverse effects and the interactions) that are given without a prescription and are basically, or only, addressed to ―healthy‖ women.<br /><br /></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document