Mentoring Resident Scholarly Activity: A Toolkit and Guide for Program Directors, Research Directors and Faculty Mentors

MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Fenton ◽  
Jiyeon Kim ◽  
Erika Abramson ◽  
Linda Waggoner-Fountain ◽  
Monique Naifeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Program Directors ◽  
Scholarly Activity ◽  
Faculty Mentors

Scholarly Activity Training: A National Survey of Residents and Program Directors Through APPD LEARN (Research Abstract)

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. e27-e28
Author(s):  
Erika L. Abramson ◽  
Michelle Stevenson ◽  
Monique Naifeh ◽  
Hoda Hammad ◽  
Linda Gerber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
National Survey ◽  
Research Abstract ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Scholarly Activity

scholarly journals A National Evaluation of the Scholarly Activity Requirement in Residency Programs: A Survey of Emergency Medicine Program Directors

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1337-1344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. Geyer ◽  
Amy H. Kaji ◽  
Eric D. Katz ◽  
Alan E. Jones ◽  
Vikhyat S. Bebarta
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Scholarly Activity ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Activity Requirement

A National Evaluation of Scholarly Activity Requirement in Osteopathic EM Residency Programs: Survey of EM Program Directors

2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. 259-262
Author(s):  
Alexander Kirkpatrick ◽  
Tom Doran ◽  
David Mullins ◽  
David Gnugnoli ◽  
John Ashurst
Keyword(s):  
Program Directors ◽  
Scholarly Activity ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Activity Requirement

Scholarly Activity Training during Residency: How Well Aligned are Program Directors and Residents?

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. e23-e24
Author(s):  
Erika L. Abramson ◽  
Michelle D. Stevenson ◽  
Monique Naifeh ◽  
Elizabeth Mauer ◽  
Linda Gerber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Program Directors ◽  
Scholarly Activity

Re: “A National Evaluation of the Scholarly Activity Requirement in Residency Programs: A Survey of Emergency Medicine Program Directors”

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-512
Author(s):  
Marna Rayl Greenberg ◽  
Vicken Y. Totten ◽  
Michael D. Repplinger ◽  
Michael D. Menchine
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Scholarly Activity ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Activity Requirement

Scholarly Activity Training During Pediatric Residency: How Well Aligned Are Program Directors and Residents?

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 998-1006
Author(s):  
Erika L. Abramson ◽  
Monique M. Naifeh ◽  
Michelle D. Stevenson ◽  
Elizabeth Mauer ◽  
Linda M. Gerber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Program Directors ◽  
Scholarly Activity ◽  
Pediatric Residency

scholarly journals Research and Scholarly Activity in US Anesthesiology Residencies: A Survey of Program Directors and Residents

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Viviane G. Nasr ◽  
Iqbal Ahmed ◽  
Iwona Bonney ◽  
Roman Schumann
Keyword(s):  
Financial Support ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Scholarly Activity ◽  
Research Activity ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Program Support ◽  
Structure Research

Background. Effective 2007, the ACGME required scholarly activity during residency. Although many programs have ongoing research, residents' involvement may be limited. This US anesthesiology residency survey assesses the current scholarly environment, research activity and program support during training. Methods. Following IRB approval, 131 US anesthesiology program directors were invited to participate in a web-based survey. Questions to directors and residents included program structure, research activity, funding and productivity. We categorized residencies threefold based on their size. Results are summarized descriptively. Results. The response rate was 31.3% (n=41) for program directors and 15.3% (n=185) for residents. Residents' responses mirrored those of program directors' regarding the presence of didactic curricula (51% versus 51.9%), research rotations (57% versus 56.2%) and a project requirement (37% versus 40%). Demands of residency (27.0%) and early stage in training (22.2%) were the main obstacles to research cited by trainees. Residents' financial support was available in 94.3% of programs. Medium and large programs had multiple funding sources (NIH, industrial and private). Conclusion. Programs are dedicated to incorporate research into their curriculum. Residents' financial support and mentorship are available, while research time is limited. Systematic improvements are needed to increase trainee research in US anesthesiology residencies.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Post-Interview Communication in the Ophthalmology Match and Its Impact on Program Directors' Ranking of Applicants

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. e74-e78
Author(s):  
David Cui ◽  
Nicholas L. Behunin ◽  
Ingrid U. Scott ◽  
Heidi Luise Wingert
Keyword(s):  
Faculty Member ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Faculty Mentor ◽  
Match Process ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Faculty Mentors ◽  
Residency Match

Abstract Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of post-interview communication (PIC) during the ophthalmology residency match process and its impact on program directors' (PD's) ranking of applicants. Design Prospective cross-sectional survey. Methods An anonymous, online survey was emailed to the PD of each ophthalmology residency program accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Results Fifty-four percent (63/116) of PDs completed the survey. Eighty-five percent (54/63) of PDs received PIC from applicants or applicants' faculty mentors during the 2018 to 2019 application cycle; 62% (39/63) received PIC regarding >25% of applicants interviewed. Although 41% (26/63) of PDs reported they would likely rank an applicant higher due to PIC endorsement from a faculty mentor known to the PD, only 3% (2/63) believed that applicants who did not have a faculty mentor conduct PIC on their behalf were disadvantaged. Fourteen percent (9/63) of PDs reported they would likely rank an applicant higher due to PIC endorsement from a faculty mentor unknown to the PD, and 3% (2/63) reported they would likely rank an applicant higher as a result of PIC from the applicant. Conclusion There is a high prevalence of PIC during the ophthalmology residency match process. The potential impact of PIC on PDs' ranking of applicants varies according to whether the PIC is from a faculty member known to the PD, a faculty member unknown to the PD, or the applicant. This may disadvantage applicants without faculty mentors known to PDs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document