scholarly journals AN ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITOR AND CALCIUM ANTAGONIST COMBINATION IN PHARMACOTHERAPY OF ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-68
Author(s):  
L. L. Kirichenko ◽  
S. V. Gatsura ◽  
A. N. Golosova ◽  
K. V. Ovsyannikov ◽  
O. V. Budik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Antagonist ◽  
Endothelial Dysfunction ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Arterial Hypertension ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

The paper focuses on the justification for preferential administration of antihypertensive combination therapy. Pharmacotherapeutic features of starting the treatment with a combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and calcium antagonists (AC) are reviewed. The authors also present the latest evidence on the ACEI/AC combination effects on such vascular parameters as microcirculation and endothelial dysfunction.

scholarly journals Control of Edema in Hypertensive Subjects Treated With Calcium Antagonist (Nifedipine) or Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors With Pycnogenol

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianni Belcaro ◽  
Maria Rosaria Cesarone ◽  
Andrea Ricci ◽  
Umberto Cornelli ◽  
Peter Rodhewald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Antagonist ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Diabetic Microangiopathy ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Capillary Filtration ◽  
Capillary Exchange

The presence of edema in different phases and stages of essential hypertension may be due to antihypertensive treatment. Some drugs may cause edema by inducing vasodilatation, increasing the capillary exchange surface and capillary filtration. Pycnogenol has an important anti-edema effect in diabetic microangiopathy and chronic venous insufficiency. This 8-week study evaluated capillary filtration in 2 comparable treatment groups with hypertension treated with a calcium antagonist (nifedipine) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor to define its efficacy in preventing edema caused by antihypertensives. A significant decrease in filtration was observed in the Pycnogenol groups. Pycnogenol controls this type of edema, it helps to prevent and limit long-term damage in the microcirculation in hypertensive patients, and allows the dose of anti-hypertensive drugs to be reduced in most patients.

Domestic practice of antihypertensive treatment of diabetic hypertensive patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (43) ◽  
pp. 1695-1700
Author(s):  
Veronika Szentes ◽  
Gabriella Kovács ◽  
Csaba András Dézsi
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus as comorbidity is present in 20–25% of patients suffering from high blood pressure. Because simultaneous presence of these two diseases results in a significant increase of cardiovascular risk, various guidelines focus greatly on the anti-hyperintensive treatment of patients with diabetes. Combined drug therapy is usually required to achieve the blood pressure target value of <140/85 mmHg defined for patients with diabetes, which must be based on angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. These can be/must be combined with low dose, primarily thiazid-like diuretics, calcium channel blockers with neutral metabolic effect, and further options include the addition of beta blockers, imidazolin-l-receptor antagonists, or alpha-1-adrenoreceptor blockers. Evidence-based guidelines are obviously present in local practice. Although most of the patients receive angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitor+indapamid or angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitor+calcium channel blocker combined therapy with favorable metabolic effects, yet the use of angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors containing hidrochlorotiazide having diabetogenic potencial, and angiotensin receptor blocker fixed combinations is still widespread. Similarly, interesting therapeutic practice can be observed with the use of less differentiated beta blockers, where the 3rd generation carvediolol and nebivolol are still in minority. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(43), 1695–1700.

Angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: an analysis of hospitalizations during the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsiana М. Sabalenka ◽  
Volha V. Zakharava ◽  
Natallia R. Prakoshyna
Keyword(s):  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Receptor Blockers

Backgraund: The pathogenesis of angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is based on the accumulation of bradykinin as a result of angiotensin-converting enzyme blockade. The SARS-CoV-2 virus by binding to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor, may inhibit its production, which in turn leads to an increase in bradykinin levels. Thus, infection with SARS-CoV-2 may be a likely trigger for the development of angioedema. Aims: to analyze the cases of hospitalizations of patients with angioedema associated with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: a retrospective analysis of the medical records of inpatient patients admitted to the Vitebsk Regional Clinical Hospital in May-December 2020 with isolated (without urticaria) angioedema while receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers was performed. All patients received smears from the naso- and oropharynx for COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction. Results: there were admitted 15 patients (9 men and 6 women) aged 44-72 years for emergency indications, which was 53.6% among all patients with isolated angioedema. In two cases, a concomitant diagnosis of mild COVID-19 infection was established with the predominance symptoms of angioedema in the clinical picture with localization in the face, tongue, sublingual area, soft palate. All patients had a favorable outcome of the disease. Conclusions: patients with аngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema may need to be hospitalized to monitor upper respiratory tract patency. There were cases of a combination of аngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema and mild COVID-19 infection. Issues requiring additional research: the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the levels of bradykinin and its metabolites; the trigger role of COVID-19 infection in the development of angioedema in patients receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers; recommendations for the management of patients with аngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema and a positive result for COVID-19.

scholarly journals Secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease: pharmacological treatment after myocardial infarction according to follow-up protocol

Medicina ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Irena Milvidaitė ◽  
Dalia Lukšienė ◽  
Birutė Šlapikienė ◽  
Marija Babarskienė ◽  
Valdas Liukaitis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Drug Complex

The aim of this work was to assess the quality of pharmacological treatment in patients within one year after acute myocardial infarction. Material and methods. We performed a prospective survey of 985 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated in the Clinic of Cardiology of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital in 2004. About half of patients were hospitalized from different regions of Lithuania. According to the follow-up protocol, an information on 514 patients and their used treatment within 13.8±3.2 months after myocardial infarction were collected by letter with questionnaire. Results. Beta-adrenoblockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and antithrombotic drugs were the most drug used (76%, 74%, and 76%, respectively) in patients following myocardial infarction. Most of the patients used a three-drug combination (36.8%), more rarely – two-drug (24.1%) or four-drug complex (19.8%). One drug was used only in 12.1% of cases; 7.2% of patients did not use any cardiac drugs. Betaadrenoblocker with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor was the most common (40.3%) used drug combination in patients on two drug complex. The combination of beta-adrenoblocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and antithrombotics was more frequently used in patients on three drug complex. The combination of two or three cardiac drugs with statin was used in several cases (1.6–10.3%). Conclusions. These findings underscore that the use of beta-adrenoblockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and antithrombotics was high (about 75%) in patients during the first year after myocardial infarction, and the combination of these three drugs was used more commonly. The discordance between existing guidelines for statin use after myocardial infarction and current practice was determined in patients following myocardial infarction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document