Use of Regional Mechanical Properties of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms to Advance Finite Element Modeling of Rupture Risk

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Áine P. Tierney ◽  
Anthony Callanan ◽  
Timothy M. McGloughlin
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 556-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Erhart ◽  
Caspar Grond-Ginsbach ◽  
Maani Hakimi ◽  
Felix Lasitschka ◽  
Susanne Dihlmann ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Evelyne van Dam ◽  
Marcel Rutten ◽  
Frans van de Vosse

Rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) based on wall stress analysis may be superior to the currently used diameter-based rupture risk prediction [4; 5; 6; 7]. In patient specific computational models for wall stress analysis, the geometry of the aneurysm is obtained from CT or MR images. The wall thickness and mechanical properties are mostly assumed to be homogeneous. The pathological AAA vessel wall may contain collageneous areas, but also calcifications, cholesterol crystals and large amounts of fat cells. No research has yet focused yet on the differences in mechanical properties of the components present within the degrading AAA vessel wall.


Author(s):  
Balaji Rengarajan ◽  
Sourav Patnaik ◽  
Ender A. Finol

Abstract In the present work, we investigated the use of geometric indices to predict patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) wall stress by means of a novel neural network (NN) modeling approach. We conducted a retrospective review of existing clinical images of two patient groups: 98 asymptomatic and 50 symptomatic AAA. The images were subject to a protocol consisting of image segmentation, processing, volume meshing, finite element modeling, and geometry quantification, from which 53 geometric indices and the spatially averaged wall stress (SAWS) were calculated. We developed feed-forward NN models composed of an input layer, two dense layers, and an output layer using Keras, a deep learning library in Python. The NN models were trained, tested, and validated independently for both AAA groups using all geometric indices, as well as a reduced set of indices resulting from a variable reduction procedure. We compared the performance of the NN models with two standard machine learning algorithms (MARS: multivariate adaptive regression splines and GAM: generalized additive model) and a linear regression model (GLM: generalized linear model). The NN-based approach exhibited the highest overall mean goodness-of-fit and lowest overall relative error compared to MARS, GAM, and GLM, when using the reduced sets of indices to predict SAWS for both AAA groups. The use of NN modeling represents a promising alternative methodology for the estimation of AAA wall stress using geometric indices as surrogates, in lieu of finite element modeling.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 1950015 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSEPH R. LEACH ◽  
CHENGCHENG ZHU ◽  
DAVID SALONER ◽  
MICHAEL D. HOPE

Biomechanical analyses can be used to better understand the rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) on a patient-specific basis using vascular geometries obtained from medical imaging. Methodologies of varying complexity are used to estimate the unloaded state of the imaged vessel to provide a reference configuration for finite element simulations. In this work, we compare the implementation and results of two of these methods, one based on geometric scaling and the other using an iterative determination of unloaded vessel geometry. We find that the two methods result in significantly different stress predictions, and that the iterative method offers superior geometric accuracy. Our findings lend context to the variation in finite element results presented in the AAA stress analysis literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document