scholarly journals LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANT FOR COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASIS: THE FIRST CASE IN LATIN AMERICA

Author(s):  
Eduardo de Souza M FERNANDES ◽  
Pal-Dag LINE ◽  
Felipe Pedreira de MELLO ◽  
Ronaldo Oliveira ANDRADE ◽  
Camila Liberato GIRÃO ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 327-349
Author(s):  
Lainie Friedman ◽  
J. Richard Thistlethwaite, Jr

This chapter explores whether living donor liver transplant (LDLT) is morally permissible when the candidate is ineligible for a deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT). Two cases are evaluated: a woman with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and a young female liver transplant recipient with a history of multiple suicide attempts who is in acute liver failure due to another intentional drug overdose. Although both women could benefit (gain life years) from liver transplant, neither is deemed eligible for DDLT by their transplant teams because of a short post-transplant life expectancy in the first case and expected poor organ stewardship in the second case. This chapter argues that LDLT is morally permissible in candidates ineligible for DDLT if the living donor provides a voluntary informed consent, knows he or she can withdraw at any time, and understands that the recipient candidate will not be listed for a DDLT should the LDLT fail.


2021 ◽  
pp. 168-179
Author(s):  
Adebowale A. Adeyemi ◽  
Elizabeth B. Rand ◽  
Kim M. Olthoff

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 026002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B Freeman ◽  
Michelle Dixon ◽  
Beth Horth ◽  
Ann Marie Melanson ◽  
Mary Beth Palladino ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1379-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taku Iida ◽  
Toshimi Kaido ◽  
Shintaro Yagi ◽  
Atsushi Yoshizawa ◽  
Koichiro Hata ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3030-3033
Author(s):  
Amer Latif ◽  
M Akif Dilshad ◽  
Sumbul Naz ◽  
Sadia Jabbar ◽  
Faisal Naseer ◽  
...  

Aims & Objectives: Corner stone in performing living donor liver transplant is to assess and predict the adequacy of the donated liver for recipient and remaining liver. Previously the conversion of liver volume to estimated weight is done by using unit to unit conversion with a factor of 1. We analyzed data of our institute to research the methodology and local applicability of the same. Place and duration of study: Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. January 2011 to June 2017 Material & Methods: Retrospective data was collected for the first 115 recipients and donors. Their preoperative liver volumes calculated by C.T scan and post-operative graft harvested with weights were compared. Results: The parameter of actual volume of right lobe averaged to 769.77 ± 12.73 gm varying with a quantum of 17.73% (426 – 1123 gm). Estimated volume of right lobe of liver varied 358 to 1218 ml (CV = 17.84%) with an average value of 798.96 ± 13.29 ml. Results of linear regression between estimated volume of right lobe and actual weight of the right lobe in gm was significantly linear (r = 0.830, r2 = 0.690, adj. r2 = 0.689 and F = 250.98, p < 0.0001), showing that volumetric assessment overestimated graft weight/volume. Following is equation generated from our data for graft weight estimation. Actual right lobe (g) = 134.004 + 0.796 (estimated right lobe volume (ml) ± 76.42. Conclusion: Using one to one principle for volume estimation of healthy liver can be misleading and therefore we propose an equation to reach more accurate estimation of graft weight. Keywords: living donor liver transplant, CT volumetry, graft to body weight ratio


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document