scholarly journals Editorial Comment: Erectile function after partial penectomy for penile cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-524
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Barros de Castro
2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 515-522
Author(s):  
Leonardo L. Monteiro ◽  
Rodrigo Skowronski ◽  
Fadi Brimo ◽  
Paulo da C. Carvalho Neto ◽  
Romulo A. L. de Vasconcelos ◽  
...  

Sexual Health ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Sosnowski ◽  
Jan Karol Wolski ◽  
Urszula Ziętalewicz ◽  
Michał Szymański ◽  
Robert Bakuła ◽  
...  

Background Surgery is the standard treatment for organ-restricted penile cancer, but it is also a disfiguring procedure that can profoundly affect quality of life. Using a survey, in this study we assessed the effect of different surgical invasiveness on satisfaction in selected life domains of patients who underwent penile-sparing surgery and partial penectomy. Methods: Forty patients who underwent penile-sparing surgery (n=13) or partial penectomy (n=27) were enrolled in the study. The response rate was 71%. Information was obtained after surgery on sexuality, self-esteem, masculinity and partner relationships using the International Index of Erectile Function, the Self-Esteem Scale and the Conformity to Masculinity Norms Inventory questionnaires. We evaluated the effect of primary surgery type on selected domains of quality of life and correlations between study variables after surgery. Results: High self-esteem, satisfactory erectile function and masculinity results in both groups were comparable to those in the published literature. Men who underwent less disfiguring treatment had a significantly higher sense of masculinity than those who underwent partial penectomy (P=0.05). No significant differences were observed in erectile dysfunction and self-esteem. The level of aggressiveness of a surgical procedure was a predictor of sense of masculinity (P=0.01), but was not associated with self-esteem and sexual dysfunction (P=0.28 and P=0.55 respectively); 83% of patients were able to satisfactorily maintain partner relationships. Conclusions: Disfiguring treatments for penile cancer significantly interfere with the sense of masculinity, but sexual functioning and self-esteem do not differ according to the type of surgical procedure. Most men maintained stable partner relationships after surgery, regardless of surgery type.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e398
Author(s):  
M. Catanzaro ◽  
G. Lughezzani ◽  
N. Nicolai ◽  
T. Torelli ◽  
D. Biasoni ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irini Youssef ◽  
Aasha Hoogland ◽  
Jad Chahoud ◽  
Philippe Spiess ◽  
Heather Jim ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Patient reports of their symptom burden (i.e., patient-reported outcomes or PROs) have been shown to direct clinicians’ ability to personalize care and improve outcomes. A disciplined assessment of PRO in the population of patients with penile cancer (PeCa) has not previously been undertaken. Our center has both a significant cadre of patients with PeCa and a significant experience with a well-established PRO: the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS).Methods: After IRB approval, we screened ESAS surveys of 14,781 patients completed between 2/2017 and 2/2021. Of these, those with PeCa were divided into three cohorts: (A) Those after any partial penectomy procedure without lymph node dissection (LND); (B) Those after partial penectomy procedure with LND; and (C) Those after total penectomy and LND. Patients with recurrent disease were analyzed separately. ESAS scores were collated and compared both by individual symptom and cumulatively.Results: 22 PeCa patients completed 122 ESAS surveys in this time and are included in this analysis: a median of 4 ESAS surveys (mean=5, range=1-19) were completed by each patient. The symptom with the highest median ESAS score was Tiredness (3.00). Patients with recurrent disease had the highest cumulative symptom score (median score = 30). Patients after total penectomy with LND had a higher cumulative symptom score (14.4) than those with partial penectomy and LND (7.9).Conclusions: PROs provide an insight into the morbidity of therapies for PeCa, and the most symptoms are reported by patients with recurrent disease.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. e230826
Author(s):  
Amit Kumar Mishra ◽  
Ketan Mehra ◽  
Ramanitharan Manikandan ◽  
Lalgudi Narayanan Dorairajan

Leukemoid reaction is a paraneoplastic phenomenon associated predominantly with solid tumours. Malignancies presenting with leukemoid reaction have a grave prognosis. It is defined as persistent neutrophil count greater than 50×103 cells/µL. We report a case of leukemoid reaction in a patient with metastatic penile cancer. A 60-year-old man with partial penectomy status for squamous cell carcinoma of penis on neoadjuvant chemotherapy, presented with left fungating inguinal lymphadenopathy and total leucocyte count 96×103 cells/µL and hypercalcaemia. Leucocytealkaline phosphatase (LAP) score was excessively elevated. The patient underwent left ilioinguinal block dissection along with vastus lateralis flap for defect reconstruction. Postoperatively, the neutrophil counts and serum calcium level normalised. The patient improved clinically and was discharged.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document