edmonton symptom assessment scale
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

215
(FIVE YEARS 80)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seda Kurt ◽  
Nihan Altan Sarıkaya

Abstract Objective: This cross-sectional study was planned to evaluate the self-efficacy and symptom control of cancer patients and to determine the factors affecting them. Methods: The sample of the study consisted of 329 cancer patients who were treated in the Medical Oncology Clinic of a university hospital between April and June 2019 and accepted to participate in the study. Data were collected using the Patient Characteristics Information Form, Cancer Behavioral Inventory-Short Version (CBI-SV), and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Percentage, mean, Mann Whitney U test, Kruskal Wallis analysis of variance were used in the analysis of the data. Results: The mean CBI-SV score of the patients was 79.10±17.55. It was determined that the highest mean score of ESAS of the patients was in the symptom of fatigue (3.53±2.81). Some symptoms were statistically lower in patients with good income, working, and non-smokers. Also it was determined that the self-efficacy levels of the patients with good income and quitting smoking were higher (p<0.05). At the same time, as the patients' self-efficacy scores increased, the severity of the symptoms they experienced decreased statistically (p<0.05). Conclusion: It was found that the patients' self-efficacy score was above the moderate level, the most intense symptom experienced by the patients was fatigue, and the severity of the symptoms decreased as the patients' self-efficacy level increased. In line with these results; the symptoms, self-efficacy perceptions and affecting factors of cancer patients should be evaluated by nurses at regular intervals, and care and consultancy services should be provided.


Author(s):  
Sriram Yennurajalingam ◽  
Vicente Valero ◽  
Zhanni Lu ◽  
Diane D. Liu ◽  
Naifa L. Busaidy ◽  
...  

Background: Despite the high frequency of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and its debilitating effects on the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer, there are limited treatment options available. Treatments including physical activity (PA) or dexamethasone (Dex) improve CRF; however, they have lower adherence rates (PA) or long-term adverse effects (Dex). The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of and preliminary results for the combination of PA and Dex in improving CRF. Methods: In this phase II randomized controlled trial, patients with advanced cancer and CRF scores of ≥4/10 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale were eligible. Patients were randomized to standardized PA for 4 weeks with either 4 mg of Dex (LoDex arm) or 8 mg of Dex (HiDex arm) twice a day for 7 days. Feasibility and change in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Illness Therapy-Fatigue subscale (FACIT-F) from baseline to day 8 and day 29 (primary outcome) were assessed. Secondary outcomes included changes in fatigue dimensions (FACIT-General, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]-Fatigue). Results: A total of 60 of 67 (90%) patients were evaluable. All patients were adherent to study medication. We found that 84% and 65% of patients in the LoDex arm and 96% and 68% of patients in the HiDex arm were adherent to aerobic and resistance exercise, respectively. The FACIT-F effect size in the LoDex arm was 0.90 (P<.001) and 0.92 (P<.001) and the effect size in the HiDex arm was 0.86 and 1.03 (P<.001 for both) at days 8 and 29, respectively. We found significant improvements in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Physical (P≤.013) and the PROMIS-Fatigue (P≤.003) at days 8 and 29 in both arms. Mixed-model analysis showed a significant improvement in the FACIT-F scores at day 8 (P<.001), day 15 (P<.001), and day 29 (P=.002). Changes in the FACIT-F scores were not significantly different between patients in the 2 arms (P=.86). Conclusions: Our study found that the combination therapy of PA with Dex was feasible and resulted in the improvement of CRF. The improvement was seen for up to 3 weeks after the discontinuation of Dex. Further larger studies are justified. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02491632.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupam Rishi ◽  
Steven Sun ◽  
Ahmad M Karimi ◽  
Austin J Sim ◽  
Michael Shafique ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) shows an impressive initial response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). However, resistance invariably develops, commonly involving the site of initial gross disease. Cytoreductive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for thoracic oligoprogressive disease (OPD) may effectively delay progression through EGFR-TKI therapy.Methods: From a prospectively maintained IRB-approved institutional registry, we identified 23 patients consecutively treated between 2011-2019 with thoracic SBRT and received EGFR-TKI within 6-months of SBRT. Radiographic progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Toxicity and patient-reported Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) scores were reviewed.Results: Median follow-up after SBRT was 20-months (range, 4-100), and the median age was 68-years (range, 33-89). Most patients were females (n=21;91.3%). RT dose was 50-60 Gy in 5-10 fractions. EGFR-TKI administered were erlotinib, osimertinib and gefitinib in 15, 5, and 3 patients, respectively. Median PFS and OS following SBRT were 8-months and 31-months, respectively. 1-year PFS and OS were 34.8% and 78.3%. The median duration of EGFR-TKI therapy was 26-months (1-91). Most patients progressed in new distant sites, most commonly bones (n=5;21.7%) and distant lung (n=4;17.4%), with only 2/23 patients having initial progression within the SBRT field. Grade-2 pneumonitis (n=2) and rib fracture (n=1) were noted radiation-related toxicities. Dominant ESAS symptoms were fatigue (21.7%), pain (8.7%), and loss of appetite (8.7%).Conclusions: For EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with thoracic OPD on EGFR-TKI, SBRT was well tolerated, resulted in changes in subsequent patterns of failure, lengthened PFS, and prolongs the duration of initial TKI therapy.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karineh Kazazian ◽  
Jessica Bogach ◽  
Wendy Johnston ◽  
Deanna Ng ◽  
Carol J. Swallow

Abstract Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, patients attending ambulatory clinics at cancer centers in Ontario completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) at each visit. At our center, completion was via touch pad, with assistance by clinic volunteers. As of March 2020, clinic appointments were conducted virtually when possible and touch pads removed. We anticipated a negative impact on the collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and the recognition of severe symptoms. Methods: We performed a prospective cross-sectional cohort study to test the feasibility of remote ESAS completion by patients with appointments at a weekly surgical oncology clinic. Patients in the initial study cohort were asked to complete and return the ESAS virtually(V). Given low completion rates, the ensuing cohort was asked to complete a hard-copy(HC) ESAS. For the final cohort, we used an adaptive approach, providing remote, personal mentorship by a member of the care team to support virtual electronic ESAS completion (virtual-mentored(VM) cohort). Results: Between May-July 2020, a total of 174 patient encounters were included in the study. For the V cohort, 20/46 patients (44%) successfully completed and returned the electronic ESAS, compared to 49/50 (98%) for the HC cohort. For the VM cohort (n=78), the completion rate was 74%. Questionnaire completion was not predicted by age, sex or tumor site, although patients who completed the ESAS were more likely to be in active management rather than surveillance(p=0.04). Of all completed forms, 42% revealed a depression score ³2, and 27% an anxiety score ³4. Conclusions: We identified significant barriers to the virtual completion of ESAS forms, with a lack of predictive variables. The severe degree of psychological distress reported by ~50% of respondents demonstrates the need for ongoing regular collection/review of these data. Innovative solutions are required to overcome barriers to virtual collection of PROs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. E202143
Author(s):  
Tuğba Menekli ◽  
Bülent Yaprak

The objective of the research was to determine the effect of educational intervention based on Bandura’s Social Cognitive Learning Theory on care dependency and symptom management after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Methods. This randomized controlled trial was conducted between January 2019 and February 2020 at the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Center. All the patients were randomly divided into two groups: 53 individuals in the intervention group and 53 individuals in the control group. The sociodemographic data collection form, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and the Care Dependency Scale were used for data collection. Data were collected from the patients one day after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and 12 weeks later. Results. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the mean scores of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and the Care Dependency Scale at baseline. Twelve weeks after intervention, there were statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the mean scores of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and the Care Dependency Scale. Conclusions. Educational intervention along with telephone counseling based on Bandura’s theory was found to be an effective way to reduce symptom severity and care dependency in patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is recommended for all patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irini Youssef ◽  
Aasha Hoogland ◽  
Jad Chahoud ◽  
Philippe Spiess ◽  
Heather Jim ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Patient reports of their symptom burden (i.e., patient-reported outcomes or PROs) have been shown to direct clinicians’ ability to personalize care and improve outcomes. A disciplined assessment of PRO in the population of patients with penile cancer (PeCa) has not previously been undertaken. Our center has both a significant cadre of patients with PeCa and a significant experience with a well-established PRO: the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS).Methods: After IRB approval, we screened ESAS surveys of 14,781 patients completed between 2/2017 and 2/2021. Of these, those with PeCa were divided into three cohorts: (A) Those after any partial penectomy procedure without lymph node dissection (LND); (B) Those after partial penectomy procedure with LND; and (C) Those after total penectomy and LND. Patients with recurrent disease were analyzed separately. ESAS scores were collated and compared both by individual symptom and cumulatively.Results: 22 PeCa patients completed 122 ESAS surveys in this time and are included in this analysis: a median of 4 ESAS surveys (mean=5, range=1-19) were completed by each patient. The symptom with the highest median ESAS score was Tiredness (3.00). Patients with recurrent disease had the highest cumulative symptom score (median score = 30). Patients after total penectomy with LND had a higher cumulative symptom score (14.4) than those with partial penectomy and LND (7.9).Conclusions: PROs provide an insight into the morbidity of therapies for PeCa, and the most symptoms are reported by patients with recurrent disease.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4660-4660
Author(s):  
Raíssa Pires Camargo Ebert ◽  
Mariana Munari Magnus ◽  
Cristina Bueno Terzi ◽  
Antonio Luis Eiras Falcão ◽  
Fernando Ferreira Costa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Palliative care (PC) is a patient-centered care model that aims to relief suffering by establishing a plan of care that integrates physical, psychosocial, cultural, familial and spiritual issues during the course of disease's evolution. Thus, PC applies not only to patients who face a diagnosis beyond the possibility of cure, but to all those who experience significant symptoms throughout the course of the disease. Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of myeloid neoplasms characterized by cytopenias and an elevated risk of developing acute leukemia. As MDS display a wide genetic heterogeneity, patients have a variable clinical presentation, ranging from asymptomatic patients to individuals with severe cytopenias and high-risk disease. MDS are more prevalent in the elderly population, which usually experience several morbidities; thus, MDS frequently lead to notable symptoms and deterioration of quality-of-life, making most of them eligible to PC in addition to standard hematologic care. In spite of that, previous studies demonstrated that patients with hematologic malignancies appear to have restricted access to PC services and receive more aggressive therapies at the end of life. Aims: To evaluate eligibility criteria for PC in a cohort of MDS patients and correlate with clinical and laboratory data. Methods: Clinical and demographic data of MDS patients were collected through interviews using a standardized questionnaire: time from diagnosis, number of morbidities, need for seeking the emergency during the last 12mo, delirium events, wounds, dysphagia, recurrent falls, adverse events to medication, quality of communication with the medical team, fears regarding the disease and its complications, religious support, age, gender, monthly household income and level of schooling. Specific PC scores were also applied: Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and Palliative Performance Scale (PPS). Clinical and laboratory data were collected: hemoglobin (Hb), platelet and neutrophil counts, Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) and transfusion burden. Statistical univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. P value &lt;.05 was considered statistically significant. This research was approved by the Institutional and National Review Board; written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Results:Thirty-six patients were evaluated: median age 68y (21-90), sex 16F/20M. According to ESAS, tiredness and anxiety were the most relevant symptoms in MDS patients [median (min-max)]: pain 0 (0-10), tiredness 4.5 (0-10), drowsiness 1.5 (0-10), nausea 0 (0-7), lack of appetite 0 (0-10), shortness of breath 0 (0-10), depression 0 (0-10), anxiety 3.5 (0-10), best wellbeing 2.5 (0-8). Younger patients (&lt;60y, n=10) had a worse ESAS for best wellbeing (5 (2-8)) when compared to older individuals (≥60y, n=26): (2 (0-7)), p=.007, and tended to have worse ESAS scores for tiredness: 8.5 (0-10) vs 3.5 (0-10), p=.56. Importantly, ESAS for tiredness was not correlated to Hb levels, the number of red blood cell transfusions nor with IPSS-R (all p&gt;.05). ESAS for drowsiness was significantly higher in patients with two (5 (0-10)) and ≥three morbidities (3 (0-8) vs those with only one morbidity (0 (0-10)): p=.01 and p=.03, respectively. ESAS for best wellbeing was better in individuals with higher household income 0 (0-0) vs patients with lower financial resources 3 (0-7), p=.04). PPS median was 90% (60-100%) and negatively correlated with transfusion burden (r=0.407, p=.01) and with the need for seeking the emergency in the past 12mo (r=-0.332, p=.04). Finally, despite facing a potential life-threatening disease, 94.4% of the patients reported that their doctors had never talked to them about aspects related to end-of-life care. Conversely, 75% of them reported fears and doubts regarding this phase. Conclusions: In our casuistic of MDS patients, tiredness was the most important symptom observed. Surprisingly, it was not correlated with Hb levels and transfusion burden, suggesting that Hb levels alone should not be used to justify symptoms. The number of morbidities and lower household income also impacted ESAS scores. Finally, a great part of the patients revealed miscommunication with their hematologists regarding end-of-life planning. Our data indicate that MDS patients might benefit from a PC multidisciplinary team approach. Disclosures Costa: Novartis: Consultancy.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Jane Grant ◽  
Gretel Spiegel ◽  
Amanda BRAND ◽  
Ki Kyung KWON ◽  
Gillian HELLER ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Around three quarters of individuals undergoing chemotherapy self-report multiple symptoms. There is clinical trial evidence of effectiveness for acupuncture for commonly experienced symptoms, and emerging evidence for reflexology, but little is known about the effects of these therapies on multiple symptoms when implemented in a real world setting during active chemotherapy treatment. Methods This was a single-arm observational study of participants receiving reflexology and/or acupuncture while attending chemotherapy. Participants received a 20 minute reflexology treatment or a 20 minute acupuncture treatment or a combination of both. Patient reported outcome measures were administered before and after the treatment using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Results During the study period, 330 unique participants with cancer received acupuncture and/or reflexology treatments. Participants had, on average, 5.3 symptoms each which they reported as moderate to severe (≥4/10) using the ESAS at baseline. Following treatment, participants reported 3.2 symptoms as moderate to severe. The symptom change for all participant encounters receiving any therapy was statistically significant for all symptoms, and clinically significant (a reduction of more than 1) for all symptoms except financial distress, appetite and memory. Clinically significant levels of global distress (<3) were reduced in 72% of all participants receiving either therapy. No adverse events were recorded. Conclusions The results indicate that acupuncture and reflexology administered alongside chemotherapy may reduce patient reported symptom burden and patient global symptom related distress. Future research would include an active control group, and consider confounding factors such as chemotherapy stage and medication.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105477382110523
Author(s):  
Serap Tekbaş ◽  
Nevin Hotun Şahin ◽  
Niyazi Cenk Sayın

This study was carried out to determine the effect of treatment on quality of life, symptoms, and social life in patients with gynecologic cancer. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews to evaluate the individual and disease characteristics of the patients. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale was used to determine the severity of the side effects. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General 4 was used to evaluate the quality of life. The total post-treatment quality of life scores of the patients were lower than their total pre-treatment scores. Patients who received chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy had a lower quality of life than those who received radiotherapy, and they were less involved in social activities. Half of the individuals participated in social activities in the pre-treatment period, but this rate decreased to 16.4% after the treatment started. In this study, the quality-of-life scores of the patients who received gynecologic cancer treatment decreased after treatment and the patients experienced many symptoms at an increasingly severe level.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 86-86
Author(s):  
Subha Perni ◽  
Chukwuma Azoba ◽  
Emily Gorton ◽  
Elyse R. Park ◽  
Bruce Allan Chabner ◽  
...  

86 Background: Cancer clinical trial (CCT) participants are at risk for experiencing adverse effects from financial toxicity, yet these remain understudied. We sought to describe associations among CCT participant-reported financial toxicity (financial burden [FB] and trial cost concerns), symptoms, illness perceptions, communication confidence, hospitalizations, and survival. Methods: From 7/2015-7/2017, we prospectively enrolled CCT participants who expressed interest in financial assistance (n = 100) and a patient group matched by age, sex, cancer type, specific trial, and trial phase (n = 98). We assessed FB (burdened by costs of cancer care), trial cost concerns (worried about affording medical costs of a CCT), physical (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS]) and psychological (Patient Health Questionnaire-4 [PHQ-4]) symptoms, illness perceptions (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire [BIPQ]), and communication confidence (Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions [PEPPI]). We used regression models to explore sociodemographic associations with FB and trial cost concerns, as well as their associations with symptom burden, illness perceptions, and communication confidence, adjusting for age, sex, race, performance status, marital status, and metastatic status. We also used Kaplan-Meier and regression methods to evaluate their associations with 6-month hospitalizations and survival. Results: Of 198 patients enrolled, 112 (56.6%) reported FB and 82 (41.4%) had trial cost concerns. Patients with FB were younger (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98) with lower incomes (< $100,000, OR 4.61, 95% CI 2.35-9.01). Patients with trial cost concerns had lower incomes (< $100,000, OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.45-5.29). On adjusted analyses, patients with FB had higher ESAS (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05), PHQ-4 depression (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.22-1.94), and PHQ-4 anxiety (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08-1.55) scores, as well as more negative illness perceptions (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07), but no significant difference in communication confidence (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.05). Patients reporting trial cost concerns had higher ESAS (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05), PHQ-4 depression (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.65), and PHQ-4 anxiety (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.51) scores, as well as more negative illness perceptions (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.10), and lower communication confidence (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99). Financial toxicity was not significantly associated with hospitalizations or survival. Conclusions: In this study of CCT participants, younger patients with lower incomes were most vulnerable to financial toxicity. Financial toxicity was associated with greater symptoms, more negative illness perceptions, and lower communication confidence, underscoring the importance of addressing these issues when seeking to alleviate the adverse effects of financial toxicity in CCT participants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document