partial penectomy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

75
(FIVE YEARS 29)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irini Youssef ◽  
Aasha Hoogland ◽  
Jad Chahoud ◽  
Philippe Spiess ◽  
Heather Jim ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Patient reports of their symptom burden (i.e., patient-reported outcomes or PROs) have been shown to direct clinicians’ ability to personalize care and improve outcomes. A disciplined assessment of PRO in the population of patients with penile cancer (PeCa) has not previously been undertaken. Our center has both a significant cadre of patients with PeCa and a significant experience with a well-established PRO: the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS).Methods: After IRB approval, we screened ESAS surveys of 14,781 patients completed between 2/2017 and 2/2021. Of these, those with PeCa were divided into three cohorts: (A) Those after any partial penectomy procedure without lymph node dissection (LND); (B) Those after partial penectomy procedure with LND; and (C) Those after total penectomy and LND. Patients with recurrent disease were analyzed separately. ESAS scores were collated and compared both by individual symptom and cumulatively.Results: 22 PeCa patients completed 122 ESAS surveys in this time and are included in this analysis: a median of 4 ESAS surveys (mean=5, range=1-19) were completed by each patient. The symptom with the highest median ESAS score was Tiredness (3.00). Patients with recurrent disease had the highest cumulative symptom score (median score = 30). Patients after total penectomy with LND had a higher cumulative symptom score (14.4) than those with partial penectomy and LND (7.9).Conclusions: PROs provide an insight into the morbidity of therapies for PeCa, and the most symptoms are reported by patients with recurrent disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Chavarriaga ◽  
Luis Becerra ◽  
Diego Camacho ◽  
Fabian Godoy ◽  
Jorge Forero ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
D A Amelinda ◽  
A Santoso ◽  
A Fawzy

Abstract Background Restoring penile function for urination and sexual activity, and achieving cosmetic result, are the goals of penile reconstruction including in post-malignancy reconstruction. Lack of studies has reported the usage of radial forearm flap on partial phalloplasty. Case Presentation A 31-years old male presented with fragile, cauliflower-like mass sizing 6x8 cm. The tumor had covered whole glans until the middle shaft of the penis. Plan of treatment for this patient started with complete excision of the tumor (partial penectomy), continued with phalloplasty. Phalloplasty consisted of using radial forearm flap (RFF) for penile foreskin (including glans), reconstructing corporal bodies using sartorius muscle, reshaping the penile glans, and urethroplasty to correct the hypospadic-looking urethra. Radial forearm flap of the non-dominant arm was implanted on the remaining foreskin of the penis, continued with wound care. On the 7th day postoperatively, no signs of necrotic, wound dehiscence, nor pus were observed, with capillary refill time on the distal fingers shown less than 2 seconds. Further evaluation is scheduled. Conclusions Loss of physiologic function usually follows partial penilectomy, which could lead to decrease in psychological quality of life. The main goal of the reconstruction of penile foreskin (including glans) using RFF is to form a newly formed penile glans that would have a cosmetic appearance nearly similar to a normal glans, which could improve its physiologic function and benefit psychologically. A challenge for health care centers in remote is is how to monitor and maintain a viable flap after the reconstruction and to keep a regular evaluation from the patient.


Author(s):  
Nicolas Fernandez ◽  
Monica Medina ◽  
Hunter Wessells ◽  
Jaime Perez

Abstract Introduction and Objective The management of penile carcinoma is very disabling and mutilating, bur early treatment can be curative. Our group systematically performs oncological management with immediate penile reconstruction and preservation of the organ (partial penectomy, resurfacing, or glansectomy) when feasible. Due to the low incidence of penile carcinoma, it is difficult to achieve experience in penile reconstruction using free grafts in a standardized and reproducible way. Therefore, we herein present the results of the use of an inanimate model to identify the most efficient geometric way to procure and apply a free skin graft to reconstruct the penis. Methods A preclinical inanimate model of the penis was developed to simulate the surgical reconstruction using a free skin graft. Six different geometric skin-graft models were created and tested. For each of them, we measured graft's surface area as well as the discarded surface after placing the graft on the penis for reconstruction. We also measured the amount of suture lines required for reconstruction. All of these measurements in the six different models were compared. Results Based on the six models, we identified that the longitude of the graft must measure the same as the maximum perimeter of the glans in order to have a square that enables the complete coverage of the penile defect. The total graft area for the first 4 models was of 40 cm2; for models 5 and 6, it was of 60 cm2. The average discarded area of the graft was of 18.135 cm2 (range: 12 cm2 to 30 cm2). Models 4 years 6 were the ones with the least discarded tissue: 12 cm2. The average amount of suture lines to secure the different model grafts was 7.3 (range: 5 to 12). The models that required the least amount of suture lines were number 1 and 4, with a total of 5 suture lines. Conclusions The double trapezoid is the most efficient model to reconstruct the glans after organ-sparing oncological management. Our results contribute to establish a more standardized and predictable technique to reconstruct the penis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-246

The os penis is a unique structure existing in some placental mammals, however it predisposes the organ to fracture. Partial penectomy is an incomplete penile amputation which is carried out when the transection site needed. In this report, a clinical case of partial penectomy in a raccoon was described. A 20-month-old, male albino raccoon (Procyon lotor) was referred to University Veterinary Hospital in Universiti Putra Malaysia with the penile prolapse. Preliminary therapeutic plan included prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotic and anti-inflammatory. Partial penectomy was arranged in this case. Postoperative treatment prescribed were fluoroquinolone antibiotic and analgesics. The prognosis was good due to minimal complication. The clinical symptoms on fracture of os penis, complications of partial penectomy, and options for treatment on fracture of os penis were discussed in this report. Castration can be an alternative preventive method to prevent trauma related to the fracture of masturbation os penis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 515-522
Author(s):  
Leonardo L. Monteiro ◽  
Rodrigo Skowronski ◽  
Fadi Brimo ◽  
Paulo da C. Carvalho Neto ◽  
Romulo A. L. de Vasconcelos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 039156032110131
Author(s):  
Gupta Prateek ◽  
Pandey Himanshu ◽  
Singh Mahendra ◽  
Goyal Suresh ◽  
Madduri Vijay Kumar Sarma ◽  
...  

Introduction: Partial penectomy is one of the common organ preserving procedures for penile malignancies and certain benign conditions. Partial penectomy causes psychosexual morbidity to the patient. Dorsal spatulation of urethra is classically done while performing the procedure, it carries risk of meatal stenosis along with compromised cosmesis. Several complex neoglans reconstructive techniques exist to prevent stenosis and improve cosmetic outcomes. We hereby describe outcomes of a simple and reproducible modification of the procedure by ventral spatulation of the urethra. Materials and method: An analysis of 31 partial penectomies from May 2016 to June 2019 using a ventral spatulation technique was done. Patients were followed up for an average of 1 year to look for meatal stenosis, the morphological appearance of residual stump and psychosexual well-being. Results: None of the patient had meatal stenosis on follow up. All patients had a satisfactory cosmetic outcome, scoring 6 or more on ANA scale. Seventeen patients reported “satisfied”, six scored “highly satisfied “and eight were “harmonic” with the outcome. Out of 31, significant patients (20) were sexually active with most of them “equally satisfied or dissatisfied” or “very much satisfied.” Conclusion: Used uncommonly, ventral spatulation of urethra is a simple, reproducible and less time consuming alternative, which avoids the chances of meatal stenosis and gives good cosmetic results with psychological benefits to patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document