scholarly journals Flavoring agents present in a dentifrice can modify volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs) formation in morning bad breath

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daiane Cristina Peruzzo ◽  
Sérgio Luis Salvador ◽  
Antonio Wilson Sallum ◽  
Getúlio da Rocha Nogueira-Filho
Impact ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (8) ◽  
pp. 6-8
Author(s):  
Masato Hotta

Bad breath (which is also known as halitosis) is something the vast majority of people around the world are familiar with. We have all likely encountered somebody with halitosis in our lives and many of the people reading this might even suffer from it. There are a range of causes of halitosis, including eating or drinking strong-smelling food and drinks, gum disease or problems with the teeth, smoking and particular medical conditions, such as tonsillitis. The best method for preventing halitosis is to perform adequate oral care, such as brushing your teeth and gums regularly, cleaning the tongue, flossing, using antibacterial mouthwash, and having regular dental check-ups. While much of this can be considered common knowledge, it is perhaps less well known that halitosis is subdivided into intraoral and extraoral halitosis, depending on the place where it originates. Dr Masato Hotta, from the Graduate School of Dentistry, Asahi University, is interested in exploring this topic in more detail. He explains that approximately 90 per cent of halitosis is intraoral, where it originates from within the oral cavity and is caused by volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs), such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S), methyl mercaptan and dimethyl sulfide. 'These VSCs are brought about through the bacterial putrefaction of food debris, cells, saliva and blood,' Hotta clarifies. 'VSCs are malodorous materials and, in addition to causing bad breath, can cause secondary tooth decay, the discoloration of teeth and dental prosthetic alloys, and periodontal disease.' While brushing and flossing are effective ways of removing biofilm and bacteria, they often have little effect on VSCs. Thus, finding a means of removing them from a patient's mouth - and alleviating bad breath - would be considered a significant breakthrough for patients with halitosis.


2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-13
Author(s):  
Kalwa Pavankumar

ABSTRACT Halitosis is a very common condition which may affect up to 30% of the population. In most cases the aetiology of the condition is from local oral causes (oral malodour). Oral malodour is the result of the action of anaerobic bacteria in producing a range of malodorous molecular species including volatile sulphur compounds. Patients with halitosis may seek treatment from dental clinicians for their perceived oral malodour. Physiologic halitosis, oral pathologic halitosis and pseudo-halitosis would be in the treatment realm of dental practitioners. Management of oral malodour is directed at managing and reducing the bacterial load both in periodontitis and in tongue coatings by instituting proper oral hygiene measures, control of tongue flora by brushing or scraping, and possibly the adjunctive use of antiseptic agents. Treatments have also been proposed to neutralise malodorous compounds by chemical agents to mask the presence of the condition. Further evidence is required to demonstrate the long-term efficacy of therapies for this troublesome condition. The purpose of this article is to review the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of oral malodor from a periodontal perspective. The review will be limited to bad breath odors originating within the mouth.


Stress ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kurihara ◽  
F.K. Marcondes

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Lyu ◽  
L.D. Araujo ◽  
S-Y. Quek ◽  
W.J. du Toit ◽  
P.A. Kilmartin

Elemental sulphur is a common fungicide applied in vineyards before harvest, and has been found toincrease the production of desirable polyfunctional mercaptans, but also H2S and unwanted reductivesulphur aroma compounds. This paper investigates the effectiveness of oxygen and nitrogen sparging,applied during fermentation, on the removal of volatile sulphur compounds in Sauvignon blanc wines.Increasing the amount of elemental sulphur added to grapes after pressing, from nil to 10 to 100 mg/L,led to an increase in the formation of 3-mercaptohexanol (3MH), of 3-mercaptohexyl acetate (3MHA) forthe 10 mg/L additions only, and of some unwanted reductive compounds. Few changes were observed inthe concentrations of aroma compounds when the juices were sparged with nitrogen during fermentation.Additions of oxygen during fermentation led to some decrease in the concentration of polyfunctionalmercaptans for the 10 mg/L sulphur additions, but did not significantly remove reductive aroma compounds.Few differences were observed in the concentration of wine phenolics or of further wine aroma familieswith any of the treatments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document