Hard Palate Repair Timing and Facial Growth in Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 563-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Fang Liao ◽  
Michael Mars
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Cleft Lip Palate ◽  
Palate Repair

Objective: To evaluate the effect of timing of hard palate repair on facial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate, with special reference to cranial base, maxilla, mandible, jaw relation, and incisor relation. Design: A systematic review. Methods: The search strategy was based on the key words “facial growth,” “cleft lip palate,” and “timing of (hard) palate repair.” Case reports, case-series, and studies with no control or comparison group in the sample were excluded. Results: Fifteen studies met the selection criteria. All the studies were retrospective and nonrandomized. Five studies used cephalometry and casts, seven used cephalometry, and three used casts. Methodological deficiencies and heterogeneity of the studies prevented major conclusions. Conclusion: The review highlights the importance of further research. Prospective well-designed, controlled studies, especially targeting long-term results, are required to elucidate the effect of timing of hard palate repair on facial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate.

Hard Palate Repair Timing and Facial Growth in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Longitudinal Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 547-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Fang Liao ◽  
Timothy J. Cole ◽  
Michael Mars
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Sri Lankan ◽  
Facial Morphology ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Clinical Notes ◽  
Timing Effect ◽  
Palate Repair

Objective: To investigate whether timing of hard palate repair had a significant effect on facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Design: Retrospective longitudinal study. Setting: Sri Lankan Cleft Lip and Palate Project. Patients: A total of 104 patients with nonsyndromic UCLP who had hard palate repair by age 13 years, with their 290 cephalometric radiographs taken after lip and palate repair. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical notes were used to record surgical treatment histories. Cephalometry was used to determine facial morphology and growth rate. Results: Timing of hard palate repair had a significant effect on the length and protrusion of the alveolar maxilla (PMP-A and SNA, respectively) and the anteroposterior alveolar jaw relation (ANB) at age 20 years but not on their growth rates. Conclusion: Timing of hard palate repair significantly affects the growth of the maxilla in patients with UCLP. Late hard palate repair has a smaller adverse effect than does early hard palate repair on the growth of the maxilla. This timing effect primarily affects the anteroposterior development of the maxillary dentoalveolus and is attributed to the development being undisturbed before closure of the hard palate.

Results of Randomized Controlled Trial of Soft Palate First versus Hard Palate First Repair in Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Richard ◽  
Joyce Russell ◽  
Siobhan McMahon ◽  
Ron Pigott
Keyword(s):  
Soft Palate ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Cleft Closure ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Intercanine Distance

Objective To compare the outcomes for primary repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate, operating on the soft palate first versus the hard palate first. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting The Regional Cleft Service of West Nepal. Patients Forty-seven consecutive patients with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate, of whom 37 were assessed 4 to 6 years after completing primary surgical repair. Interventions Primary repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate by two differing sequences: (1) soft palate repair, with hard palate and lip repair 3 months later; and (2) lip and hard palate repair, followed by the soft palate repair 3 months later. Main Outcome Measures Analysis of dental study models, weight gain, and speech recordings. Results Four to 7 years after completing the cleft closure, there was no significant difference in facial growth between the two types of repair sequencing. Completing posterior repair first had no effect on anterior alveolar gap width. It narrowed the hard palate gap by reducing the intercanine distance. Anterior repair dramatically closed the anterior alveolar gap, and narrowed the intercanine distance. Comparing anterior alveolar gap width with age at first presentation demonstrated that there was no spontaneous narrowing of the cleft in older children. Completing posterior closure first had a weight gain advantage over anterior closure first. Improved oropharyngeal closure, and thus swallowing, is the likely explanation. Conclusion Changing the sequencing of cleft closure has no demonstrable difference in facial growth at 4 to 7 years after completion of the primary surgery.

Hard Palate Repair Timing and Facial Morphology in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: before versus after Pubertal Peak Velocity Age

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Fang Liao ◽  
Michael Mars
Keyword(s):  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Effective Length ◽  
Facial Morphology ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Palate Repair

Objective To investigate whether timing of hard palate repair, before versus after pubertal peak velocity age, had a significant effect on facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Design Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting Sri Lankan Cleft Lip and Palate Project. Patients A total of 125 adult patients with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate were recruited and their last cephalometric radiographs were used. Main Outcome Measures Clinical notes were used to record surgical treatment histories. Cephalometry was used to determine facial morphology. Results The patients who had hard palate repair after pubertal peak velocity age had a deeper bony pharynx (Ba-PMP), a longer alveolar maxilla (PMP-A), a longer effective length of the maxilla (Ar-ANS, Ar-A), and as a result had a more favorable anteroposterior jaw relation (ANS-N-Pog, ANB, NAPog) and larger overjet, compared with those who had hard palate repair before pubertal peak velocity age. Conclusion Timing of hard palate repair significantly affects the growth of the maxilla in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Hard palate repair after (versus before) pubertal peak velocity age has a smaller adverse effect on the forward growth of the maxilla. This timing affects the forward displacement of the basal maxilla and the anteroposterior development of the maxillary dentoalveolus.

scholarly journals Palatal morphology in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: Association with infant cleft dimensions and timing of hard palate repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna Botticelli ◽  
Annelise Küseler ◽  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Maja Ovsenik ◽  
Sven Erik Nørholt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Palate Repair

Influence of Infant Cleft Dimensions on Velopharyngeal Function in 5-Year-Old Danish Children Born With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-429
Author(s):  
Susanna Botticelli ◽  
Annelise Küseler ◽  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Helene Soegaard Andersen ◽  
Maria Boers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Palate ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function

Aim: To examine the association of cleft severity at infancy and velopharyngeal competence in preschool children with unilateral cleft lip and palate operated with early or delayed hard palate repair. Design: Subgroup analysis within a multicenter randomized controlled trial of primary surgery (Scandcleft). Setting: Tertiary health care. One surgical center. Patients and Methods: One hundred twenty-five infants received cheilo-rhinoplasty and soft palate repair at age 3 to 4 months and were randomized to hard palate closure at age 12 or 36 months. Cleft size and cleft morphology were measured 3 dimensionally on digital models, obtained by laser surface scanning of preoperative plaster models (mean age: 1.8 months). Main outcome measurements: Velopharyngeal competence (VPC) and hypernasality assessed from a naming test (VPC-Sum) and connected speech (VPC-Rate). In both scales, higher scores indicated a more severe velopharyngeal insufficiency. Results: No difference between surgical groups was shown. A low positive correlation was found between posterior cleft width and VPC-Rate (Spearman = .23; P = .025). The role of the covariate “cleft size at tuberosity level” was confirmed in an ordinal logistic regression model (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.01-1.35). A low negative correlation was shown between anteroposterior palatal length and VPC-Sum (Spearman = −.27; P = .004) and confirmed by the pooled scores VPC-Pooled (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.98) and VPC-Dichotomic (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68-0.99). Conclusions: Posterior cleft dimensions can be a modest indicator for the prognosis of velopharyngeal function at age 5 years, when the soft palate is closed first, independently on the timing of hard palate repair. Antero-posterior palatal length seems to protect from velopharyngeal insufficiency and hypernasality. However, the association found was significant but low.

Facial Growth in Patients with Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cephalometric Study

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiki L.W.M. Heidbüchel ◽  
Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman ◽  
Hans Peter M. Freihofer
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Nasolabial Angle ◽  
Comparison Results ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip

In this study, sagittal facial growth of bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) patients between 6 and 20 years of age is analyzed. The data of Nljmegen were derived from 131 lateral cephalograms taken in 21 BCLP patients who were treated In the Cleft Lip and Palate Center of the University Hospital of Nljmegen. Reported data of 90 BCLP patients treated at the Center of Oslo were used as a reference for comparison. Results of this Investigation showed mandibular growth to be similar in both centers. In the premaxillary region some differences were found: The Nljmegen patients presented a more protrusive premaxilla than those at Oslo. The upper front teeth and hence, the premaxilla, were more retroclined In the Nljmegen sample. There were also statistically significant differences in the soft tissue profile. The mean z-score was positive for the nasolabial angle and negative for the angle N'-Sn-Pg'. At 18 years of age, these differences are still apparent. In comparison with Broadbent's values of normal individuals, the SNPg-angle was smaller and the mandibular angle greater in Nljmegen and Oslo. The profiles of the BCLP patients are more convex in Nljmegen and more concave in Oslo than In the noncleft group. Finally, the different treatment strategies of the Cleft Lip and Palate Centers of Nljmegen and Oslo are compared and discussed In terms of their long-term results.

A Comparison of Three Methods of Repairing the Hard Palate

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. Pigott ◽  
E. H. Albery ◽  
I. S. Hathorn ◽  
N. E. Atack ◽  
A. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Strong Trend ◽  
Computer Based ◽  
Palate Repair

Objective To compare growth, speech, and nasal symmetry outcomes of three methods of hard palate repair. Patients Consecutive available records of children born with unilateral bony complete cleft lip and palate over the period 1972 to 1992. Interventions Identical management of lip, nose, alveolus, and soft palate. Hard palate repair by Cuthbert Veau (CV) from 1972 to 1981, von Langenbeck (vL) from 1982 to 1989, or medial Langenbeck (ML) from 1989 to 1991. Outcome Measures For growth: GOSLON yardstick or 5-year model index. For speech: articulation test. Nasal anemometry. For nasal symmetry: Coghlan computer-based assessment. All these measures were developed during the period of data collection but not for this project. Results There was a strong trend toward more favorable anteroposterior maxillary growth with the change from CV to vL to ML techniques. This fell short of statistical significance because of the small sample size. There was a significant reduction in cleft-related articulation faults (p = .01) considered to be related to improved arch form. In the absence of improved rates of velopharyngeal insufficiency or nasal symmetry, increased surgical experience was discounted as a significant contribution to improved growth and articulation outcomes. Conclusions Reduced periosteal undermining and residual exposed palatal shelf from CV to vL to ML improved incisor relationships and articulation.

Influence of different palate repair protocols on facial growth in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Xu ◽  
Hyuk-Jae Kwon ◽  
Bing Shi ◽  
Qian Zheng ◽  
Heng Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Palate Repair

Two-Stage Palate Repair with Delayed Hard Palate Closure Is Related to Favorable Maxillary Growth in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2010 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. 1503-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Fang Liao ◽  
I-Ying Yang ◽  
Ruby Wang ◽  
Claudia Yun ◽  
Chiung-Shing Huang
Keyword(s):  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Maxillary Growth
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document