A Rapid Solution to Align the Severely Malpositioned Premaxilla in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amornpong T. Vachiramon ◽  
John N. Groper ◽  
Simon Gamer

Objective: To describe a laboratory modification of the maxillary cast to make an improved nasoalveolar molding plate used in presurgical orthopedics for infants with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Conclusions: Modifying the nasoalveolar molding plate may reduce the presurgical treatment time for the bilateral cleft lip and palate patient.

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Jasmeet Singh ◽  
Deepak Kumar ◽  
Kamlesh Singh ◽  
Kriti Singh

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 655-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supakit Peanchitlertkajorn ◽  
Ana Mercado ◽  
John Daskalogiannakis ◽  
Ronald Hathaway ◽  
Kathleen Russell ◽  
...  

Objective: To compare nasolabial appearance outcomes of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP) in preadolescence from 4 cleft centers including a center using nasoalveolar molding (NAM) and primary nasal reconstruction. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Four cleft centers in North America. Patients: 135 subjects with repaired CUCLP. Methods: Frontal and profile facial pictures were assessed using the Asher-McDade rating scale. Intra- and interrater reliability were tested using weighted Kappa statistics. Median scores by center were compared with Kruskal-Wallis statistics. Results: Intrarater reliability scores were moderate to good. Interrater reliability scores were moderate. Significant differences ( P < .05) among centers were found. For nasal form, center G (median = 2.83) had better scores than centers C and D (C median = 3.33, D median = 3.17). For nose symmetry, center G had better scores (median = 2.33) than all other centers (B median = 2.67, C median = 2.83, D median = 2.83). For vermillion border, center G had better scores (median = 2.58) than centers B and C (B median = 3.17, C median = 3.17). For nasolabial profile, center G (median score = 2.67) had better scores than center C (median = 3.00). For total nasolabial score, center G (median = 2.67) had better scores than all other centers (B median = 2.83, C median = 3, D median = 2.83). Conclusion: The protocol followed by center G, the only center that performed NAM and primary nasal reconstruction, produced better results in all categories when compared to center C, the only center that did not perform presurgical orthopedics or lip/nose revisions. When compared to centers that performed traditional presurgical orthopedics and surgical revisions (B and D), center G was not consistently better in all categories. As with other uncontrolled, retrospective intercenter studies, it is not possible to attribute the outcomes to a specific protocol component.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. e179-e184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belma Isik Aslan ◽  
Ayşe Gülşen ◽  
Kemal Findikçioğlu ◽  
Deniz Uzuner ◽  
Neslihan Üçüncü

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam L. Spengler ◽  
Carmen Chavarria ◽  
John F. Teichgraeber ◽  
Jaime Gateno ◽  
James J. Xia

Objective To evaluate the outcome of presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy in the treatment of patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Design A prospective study with blinded measurements. Setting The Cleft and Craniofacial Clinic at the University of Texas at Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas. Patients Eight patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate, treated between 2002 and 2004. Interventions The starting age for presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy was 34.9 days and the average length of the therapy was 212.5 days. Main Outcome Measures Measurements of intraoral and extraoral casts were performed, and statistical analyses were used to compare the differences between measurements before and after therapy. Results Intraoral measurements demonstrated that there was a statistically significant reduction of the premaxillary protrusion and deviation. There was also a significant reduction in the width of the larger cleft. Extraoral measurements revealed that there was a significant increase in the bi-alar width and in the columellar length and width. Moreover, there was a significant improvement in columellar deviation. Finally, the nostril heights of both sides were increased. Conclusion The authors have quantitatively shown that presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy has significant advantages in the treatment of bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. It improves the nasal asymmetry and deficient nasal tip projection associated with bilateral cleft lip and palate. It also forces the protruded premaxillary segment into alignment with the dental alveolar segments, improving the shape of the maxillary arch. As a result, the changes associated with presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy help decrease the complexity of subsequent surgeries.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Tai ◽  
Jae Hyun Park ◽  
Masahiro Tanino ◽  
Yasumori Sato

Treatment of patients with a cleft lip and palate can be challenging. A boy, 15 years 11 months old, with a bilateral cleft lip and palate and a convex profile, transposed teeth and congenitally missing teeth was treated by orthodontic treatment. 3 year posttreatment records showed excellent results with good occlusion,facial balance and harmony, and long-term stability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document