Effect of Malathion on Larval Competition Between Aedes albopictus and Aedes atropalpus (Diptera: Culicidae)

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 479-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Banugopan Kesavaraju ◽  
Christopher W. Brey ◽  
Ary Farajollahi ◽  
Heather L. Evans ◽  
Randy Gaugler
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Talya Shragai ◽  
Laura Harrington ◽  
Catalina Alfonso-Parra ◽  
Frank Avila

Abstract Background Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus are two globally invasive vectors with similar ecological niches. Encounters between them can result in either competitive exclusion or stable co-existence, but it is unclear what drives these variable outcomes. Larval competition in favor of Ae. albopictus is a main hypothesis for the competitive exclusion of Ae. aegypti observed in some regions. However, the role of oviposition preference in determining the degree of competitive larval interactions in the field is not well understood. In this study, we used a combination of mark-release-recapture methods with ovitraps in the open-field and a semi-field cage to test whether gravid Ae. albopictus seek oviposition sites in response to the presence, species, and density of either conspecific or heterospecific Ae. aegypti larvae in the aquatic habitat. We conducted our study in Medellín, Colombia, where Ae. aegypti is a long-term resident and Ae. albopictus is a recent invader. Results In the open-field and semi-field cage experiments, gravid Ae. albopictus showed strong preference for ovitraps with larvae over those without. They consistently preferred ovitraps with higher density of conspecific (Ae. albopictus) larvae and low density of heterospecific (Ae. aegypti) larvae over traps with no larvae or high density of heterospecific (Ae. aegypti) larvae. In the semi-field cage experiment, traps with low density of Ae. albopictus were not preferred more or less than any other trap, but in the open-field experiment they were preferred over traps without larvae. Conclusions We demonstrate, through open-field and semi-field cage experiments, that Ae. albopictus are more attracted to oviposition sites with larvae and that the combination of species and density of larvae influence attraction. This demonstrated preference could increase interspecific larval competition as Ae. albopictus actively seek containers with conspecific and heterospecific larvae. Any resulting competition with Ae. aegypti may favor one species over the other and alter the distribution or abundance of both. Because these species vary in vectorial capacity and insecticide resistance, effects of interspecific competition could ultimately impact arbovirus transmission rates and the success of vector control efforts.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. Armistead ◽  
Naoya Nishimura ◽  
Richard L. Escher ◽  
L. Philip Lounibos

1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark G. Novak ◽  
Leon G. Higley ◽  
Carl A. Christianssen ◽  
Wayne A. Rowley

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 1266-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Baldacchino ◽  
Daniele Arnoldi ◽  
Charlotte Lapère ◽  
Roberto Rosà ◽  
Fabrizio Montarsi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (156) ◽  
pp. 20190270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Paton ◽  
Michael B. Bonsall

Vector ecology is integral to understanding the transmission of vector-borne diseases, with processes such as reproduction and competition pivotal in determining vector presence and abundance. The arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus compete as larvae, but this mechanism is insufficient to explain patterns of coexistence and exclusion. Inviable interspecies matings—known as reproductive interference—is another candidate mechanism. Here, we analyse mathematical models of mosquito population dynamics and epidemiology which include two Aedes -specific features of reproductive interference. First, as these mosquitoes use hosts to find mates, reproductive interference will only occur if the same host is visited. Host choice will, in turn, be determined by behavioural responses to host availability. Second, females can become sterilized after mis-mating with heterospecifics. We find that a species with an affinity for a shared host will suffer more from reproductive interference than a less selective competitor. Costs from reproductive interference can be ‘traded-off’ against costs from larval competition, leading to competitive outcomes that are difficult to predict from empirical evidence. Sterilizations of a self-limiting species can counterintuitively lead to higher densities than a competitor suffering less sterilization. We identify that behavioural responses and reproductive interference mediate a concomitant relationship between vector ecological dynamics and epidemiology. Competitors with opposite behavioural responses can maintain disease where human hosts are rare, due to vector coexistence facilitated by a reduced cost from reproductive interference. Our work elucidates the relative roles of the competitive mechanisms governing Aedes populations and the associated epidemiological consequences.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S Paton ◽  
Michael B Bonsall

AbstractVector ecology is integral to understanding the transmission of vector-borne diseases, with processes such as reproduction and competition pivotal in determining vector presence and abundance. The arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus compete as larvae, but this mechanism is insufficient to explain patterns of coexistence and exclusion. Inviable interspecies matings - known as reproductive interference - is another candidate mechanism. Here, we analyse mathematical models of mosquito population dynamics and epidemiology which include two Aedes-specific features of reproductive interference. First, as these mosquitoes use hosts to find mates, reproductive interference will only occur if the same host is visited. Host choice will, in turn, be determined by functional responses to host availability. Second, females can become sterilised after mis-mating with heterospecifics. We find that a species with an affinity for a shared host will suffer more from reproductive interference than a less selective competitor. Costs from reproductive interference can be “traded-off” against costs from larval competition, leading to competitive outcomes difficult to predict from empirical evidence. Sterilisations of a self-limiting species can counter-intuitively lead to higher densities than a competitor suffering less sterilisation. We identify that functional responses and reproductive interference mediate a concomitant relationship between vector ecological dynamics and epidemiology. Competitors with opposite functional responses can maintain disease where human hosts are rare, due to vector coexistence facilitated by a reduced cost from reproductive interference. Our work elucidates the relative roles of the competitive mechanisms governing Aedes populations and the associated epidemiological consequences.


2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Armistead ◽  
J. R. Arias ◽  
N. Nishimura ◽  
L. P. Lounibos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document