scholarly journals VOLE POPULATION FLUCTUATIONS: FACTORS THAT INITIATE AND DETERMINE INTERVALS BETWEEN THEM IN MICROTUS OCHROGASTER

2006 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lowell L. Getz ◽  
Madan K. Oli ◽  
Joyce E. Hofmann ◽  
Betty McGuire
1986 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
pp. 2871-2872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Ostfeld ◽  
Robert H. Tamarin

We examined the assertion that seasonal fluctuations in food availability are necessary for vole cycles to take place by studying the dynamics of a California vole (Microtus californicus) population inhabiting a relatively aseasonal environment. That population was one of the most stable (noncyclic) microtine populations yet described. Reproduction was comparatively aseasonal but appeared to be suppressed at high population density. We suggest that the role of seasonality in vole population fluctuations deserves further study.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Giraudoux ◽  
Aurélien Levret ◽  
Eve Afonso ◽  
Michael Coeurdassier ◽  
Geoffroy Couval

AbstractVoles can reach high densities with multi-annual population fluctuations of large amplitude, and they are at the base of large and rich communities of predators in temperate and arctic food webs. This status places them at the heart of management conflicts wherein crop protection and health concerns are often raised against conservation issues. Here, a 20-year survey describes the effects of large variations in grassland vole populations on the densities and the daily theoretical food intakes (TFI) of vole predators based on roadside counts. Our results show how the predator community responds to prey variations of large amplitude and how it reorganized with the increase in a dominant predator, here the red fox, which likely negatively impacted hare, European wildcat and domestic cat populations. They also indicate which subset of predator species might have a role in vole population control in the critical phase of a low density of grassland voles. Our study provides empirical support for more timely and better focused actions in wildlife management and vole population control, and it supports an evidence-based and constructive dialogue about management targets and options between all stakeholders of such socio-ecosystems.


1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 909-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
LOWELL L. GETZ ◽  
JOYCE E. HOFMANN ◽  
CAROL S. CARTER

1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 1317-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lowell L. Getz ◽  
Joyce E. Hofmann ◽  
Brian J. Klatt ◽  
Louis Verner ◽  
F. Russell Cole ◽  
...  

Population densities of Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus were monitored from 1972 to 1986 in three habitats: alfalfa, bluegrass, and tallgrass prairie. Microtus ochrogaster displayed two apparent multiannual population cycles in alfalfa and bluegrass from 1972 to 1976; thereafter only annual (alfalfa) or erratic (bluegrass) fluctuations were apparent. Except for extremely high densities during 1984–1985, population fluctuations of M. ochrogaster in tallgrass were erratically low and there was no evidence of multiannual cycles. During 15 of 29 changes in population density of M. ochrogaster, the amplitude of fluctuations was more than 10-fold; 14 of these changes were preceded by marked population declines or very low densities the previous winter and spring. Microtus pennsylvanicus displayed annual fluctuations in abundance in alfalfa and bluegrass and was erratically high at all times in tallgrass. Only 7 of 32 population fluctuations of M. pennsylvanicus had amplitudes of at least 10-fold; in all 7 cases population density had been high the previous year. We conclude that distinct multiannual population cycles were not characteristic of either species in any habitat over the 14 years. Most previous assumptions of multiannual cycles in these species may be artifacts of short-term studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document