A quantitative analysis of testosterone action on FSH secretion from individual pituitary cells using the cell immunoblot assay

1996 ◽  
Vol 148 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Noguchi ◽  
J Arita ◽  
A Nagamoto ◽  
M Hosaka ◽  
F Kimura

Abstract We investigated the effects of testosterone on FSH secretion from male rat anterior pituitary cells in culture at the single cell level. Anterior pituitary cells cultured with or without 10 ng/ml testosterone for 72 h were mono-dispersed and subjected to cell immunoblot assays for FSH. Cell blots specific for FSH were quantified by means of a microscopic image analyzer. The number of FSH-secreting cells detected as immunoreactive cell blots on the transfer membrane represented 4·1% of total pituitary cells applied on the membrane. The amount of FSH secreted by single cells varied from <20 to >8 000 fg/cell/h. The number of FSH-secreting cells was not changed by the addition of 10 ng/ml testosterone into the culture medium. Testosterone administration increased the mean FSH secretion by 64% after 3 h incubation, resulting in a shift to the right in the frequency distribution of FSH secretion from single cells. The total amount of FSH, namely the sum of FSH secreted by each FSH-secreting cell, was increased by 92% by the addition of testosterone. However, mean amounts of FSH secretion by the top ten cells of the largest secretor subgroup (>5 pg/cell/3 h) were not different between control and testosterone-treated groups. The present study analyzed, for the first time, FSH secretion from rat anterior pituitary cells at the single cell level. The results suggest that stimulation by testosterone of FSH secretion in vitro is not due to an increase in the number of FSH-secreting cells but to an increase in FSH secretion from each cell. Journal of Endocrinology (1996) 148, 427–433

Cells ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 285
Author(s):  
Eszter Széles ◽  
Krisztina Nagy ◽  
Ágnes Ábrahám ◽  
Sándor Kovács ◽  
Anna Podmaniczki ◽  
...  

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is a model organism of increasing biotechnological importance, yet, the evaluation of its life cycle processes and photosynthesis on a single-cell level is largely unresolved. To facilitate the study of the relationship between morphology and photochemistry, we established microfluidics in combination with chlorophyll a fluorescence induction measurements. We developed two types of microfluidic platforms for single-cell investigations: (i) The traps of the “Tulip” device are suitable for capturing and immobilizing single cells, enabling the assessment of their photosynthesis for several hours without binding to a solid support surface. Using this “Tulip” platform, we performed high-quality non-photochemical quenching measurements and confirmed our earlier results on bulk cultures that non-photochemical quenching is higher in ascorbate-deficient mutants (Crvtc2-1) than in the wild-type. (ii) The traps of the “Pot” device were designed for capturing single cells and allowing the growth of the daughter cells within the traps. Using our most performant “Pot” device, we could demonstrate that the FV/FM parameter, an indicator of photosynthetic efficiency, varies considerably during the cell cycle. Our microfluidic devices, therefore, represent versatile platforms for the simultaneous morphological and photosynthetic investigations of C. reinhardtii on a single-cell level.


1983 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Fujihara ◽  
Masataka Shiino

The effect of thyrotrophin-releasing hormone (TRH, 10−7 M) on luteinizing hormone (LH) release from rat anterior pituitary cells was examined using organ and primary cell culture. The addition of TRH to the culture medium resulted in a slightly enhanced release of LH from the cultured pituitary tissues. However, the amount of LH release stimulated by TRH was not greater than that produced by luteinizing hormone – releasing hormone (LH–RH, 10−7 M). Actinomycin D (2 × 10−5 M) and cycloheximide (10−4 M) had an inhibitory effect on the action of TRH on LH release. The inability of TRH to elicit gonadotrophin release from the anterior pituitary glands in vivo may partly be due to physiological inhibition of its action by other hypothalamic factor(s).


2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (13) ◽  
pp. 4550-4556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicky G. Kastbjerg ◽  
Dennis S. Nielsen ◽  
Nils Arneborg ◽  
Lone Gram

ABSTRACT Listeria monocytogenes has a remarkable ability to survive and persist in food production environments. The purpose of the present study was to determine if cells in a population of L. monocytogenes differ in sensitivity to disinfection agents as this could be a factor explaining persistence of the bacterium. In situ analyses of Listeria monocytogenes single cells were performed during exposure to different concentrations of the disinfectant Incimaxx DES to study a possible population subdivision. Bacterial survival was quantified with plate counting and disinfection stress at the single-cell level by measuring intracellular pH (pHi) over time by fluorescence ratio imaging microscopy. pHi values were initially 7 to 7.5 and decreased in both attached and planktonic L. monocytogenes cells during exposure to sublethal and lethal concentrations of Incimaxx DES. The response of the bacterial population was homogenous; hence, subpopulations were not detected. However, pregrowth with NaCl protected the planktonic bacterial cells during disinfection with Incimaxx (0.0015%) since pHi was higher (6 to 6.5) for the bacterial population pregrown with NaCl than for cells grown without NaCl (pHi 5 to 5.5) (P < 0.05). The protective effect of NaCl was reflected by viable-cell counts at a higher concentration of Incimaxx (0.0031%), where the salt-grown population survived better than the population grown without NaCl (P < 0.05). NaCl protected attached cells through drying but not during disinfection. This study indicates that a population of L. monocytogenes cells, whether planktonic or attached, is homogenous with respect to sensitivity to an acidic disinfectant studied on the single-cell level. Hence a major subpopulation more tolerant to disinfectants, and hence more persistent, does not appear to be present.


2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 1032-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Kroneis ◽  
Jochen B Geigl ◽  
Amin El-Heliebi ◽  
Martina Auer ◽  
Peter Ulz ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Analysis of chromosomal aberrations or single-gene disorders from rare fetal cells circulating in the blood of pregnant women requires verification of the cells' genomic identity. We have developed a method enabling multiple analyses at the single-cell level that combines verification of the genomic identity of microchimeric cells with molecular genetic and cytogenetic diagnosis. METHODS We used a model system of peripheral blood mononuclear cells spiked with a colon adenocarcinoma cell line and immunofluorescence staining for cytokeratin in combination with DNA staining with the nuclear dye TO-PRO-3 in a preliminary study to define candidate microchimeric (tumor) cells in Cytospin preparations. After laser microdissection, we performed low-volume on-chip isothermal whole-genome amplification (iWGA) of single and pooled cells. RESULTS DNA fingerprint analysis of iWGA aliquots permitted successful identification of all analyzed candidate microchimeric cell preparations (6 samples of pooled cells, 7 samples of single cells). Sequencing of 3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms was successful at the single-cell level for 20 of 32 allelic loci. Metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) with iWGA products of single cells showed the gains and losses known to be present in the genomic DNA of the target cells. CONCLUSIONS This method may be instrumental in cell-based noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Furthermore, the possibility to perform mCGH with amplified DNA from single cells offers a perspective for the analysis of nonmicrochimeric rare cells exhibiting genomic alterations, such as circulating tumor cells.


1984 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
William W. Wilfinger ◽  
William J. Larsen ◽  
Thomas R. Downs ◽  
Donald L. Wilbur

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 494-501
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Jiang ◽  
Huifang Zhou ◽  
Mingqing Shi ◽  
Boru Zhou ◽  
Bei Liu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document