scholarly journals Early Steroid Withdrawal in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients with Delayed Graft Function

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunjae Bae ◽  
Jacqueline M. Garonzik Wang ◽  
Allan B. Massie ◽  
Kyle R. Jackson ◽  
Mara A. McAdams-DeMarco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
The United States ◽  
Delayed Graft Function ◽  
Steroid Withdrawal ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Pronounced Increase

BackgroundEarly steroid withdrawal (ESW) is associated with acceptable outcomes in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Recipients with delayed graft function (DGF), however, often have a suboptimal allograft milieu, which may alter the risk/benefit equation for ESW. This may contribute to varying practices across transplant centers.MethodsUsing the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we studied 110,019 adult deceased-donor KT recipients between 2005 and 2017. We characterized the association of DGF with the use of ESW versus continued steroid maintenance across KT centers, and quantified the association of ESW with acute rejection, graft failure, and mortality using multivariable logistic and Cox regression with DGF-ESW interaction terms.ResultsOverall 29.2% of KT recipients underwent ESW. Recipients with DGF had lower odds of ESW (aOR=0.600.670.75). The strength of this association varied across 261 KT centers, with center-specific aOR of <0.5 at 31 (11.9%) and >1.0 at 22 (8.4%) centers. ESW was associated with benefits and harms among recipients with immediate graft function (IGF), but only with harms among recipients with DGF. ESW was associated with increased acute rejection (aOR=1.091.161.23), slightly increased graft failure (aHR=1.011.061.12), but decreased mortality (aHR=0.860.890.93) among recipients with IGF. Among recipients with DGF, ESW was associated with a similar increase in rejection (aOR=1.12; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.23), a more pronounced increase in graft failure (aHR=1.16; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.26), and no improvement in mortality (aHR=1.00; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.07). DGF-ESW interaction was statistically significant for graft failure (P=0.04) and mortality (P=0.003), but not for rejection (P=0.6).ConclusionsKT centers in the United States use ESW inconsistently in recipients with DGF. Our findings suggest ESW may lead to worse KT outcomes in recipients with DGF.

MO941CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN KIDNEY RE-TRANSPLANTATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Pardinhas ◽  
Rita Leal ◽  
Francisco Caramelo ◽  
Teofilo Yan ◽  
Carolina Figueiredo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Delayed Graft Function ◽  
First Year ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Background and Aims As kidney transplants are growing in absolute numbers, so are patients with failed allografts and thus potential candidates for re-transplantation. Re-transplantation is challenging due to immunological barriers, surgical difficulties and clinical complexities but it has been proven that successful second transplantation improves life expectancy over dialysis. It is important to evaluate re-transplantation outcomes since 20% of patients on the waiting list are waiting for a second graft. Our aim was to compare major clinical outcomes such as acute rejection, graft and patient survival, between patients receiving a first or a second kidney transplant. Method We performed a retrospective study, that included 1552 patients submitted to a first (N=1443, 93%) or a second kidney transplant (N=109, 7%), between January 2008 and December 2018. Patients with more than 2 grafts or multi-organ transplant were excluded. Demographic, clinical and histocompatibility characteristics of both groups were registered from our unit database and compared. Delayed graft function was defined has the need of dialysis in the first week post-transplant. All acute rejection episodes were biopsy proven, according to Banff 2017 criteria. Follow-up time was defined at 1st June 2020 for functioning grafts or at graft failure (including death with a functioning graft). Results Recipients of a second graft were significantly younger (43 ±12 vs 50 ± 13 years old, p&lt;0.001) and there were significantly fewer expanded-criteria donors in the second transplant group (31.5% vs 57.5%, p&lt;0.001). The waiting time for a second graft was longer (63±50 vs 48±29 months, p=0.011). HLA mismatch was similar for both groups but PRA was significantly higher for second KT patients (21.6±25% versus 3±9%; p&lt;0.001). All patients submitted to a second KT had thymoglobulin as induction therapy compared to 16% of the first KT group (p&lt;0.001). We found no difference in primary dysfunction or delayed graft function between groups. Acute rejection was significantly more frequent in second kidney transplant recipients (19% vs 5%, p&lt;0.001), being 10 acute cellular rejections, 7 were antibody mediated and 3 were borderline changes. For the majority of the patients (85%), acute rejection occurred in the first-year post-transplant. Death censored graft failure occurred in 236 (16.4%) patients with first kidney transplant and 25 (23%) patients with a second graft, p=0.08. Survival analysis showed similar graft survival for both groups (log-rank p=0.392). We found no difference in patients’ mortality at follow up for both groups. Conclusion Although second graft patients presented more episodes of biopsy proven acute rejection, especially at the first-year post-transplant, we found no differences in death censored graft survival or patients’ mortality for patients with a second kidney transplant. Second transplants should be offered to patients whenever feasible.

scholarly journals Impact of deceased donor with acute kidney injury on subsequent kidney transplant outcomes–an ANZDATA registry analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0249000
Author(s):  
Juan Pei ◽  
Yeoungjee Cho ◽  
Yong Pey See ◽  
Elaine M. Pascoe ◽  
Andrea K. Viecelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Hazard Ratio

Background The need for kidney transplantation drives efforts to expand organ donation. The decision to accept organs from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) can result in a clinical dilemma in the context of conflicting reports from published literature. Material and methods This observational study included all deceased donor kidney transplants performed in Australia and New Zealand between 1997 and 2017. The association of donor-AKI, defined according to KDIGO criteria, with all-cause graft failure was evaluated by multivariable Cox regression. Secondary outcomes included death-censored graft failure, death, delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection. Results The study included 10,101 recipients of kidneys from 5,774 deceased donors, of whom 1182 (12%) recipients received kidneys from 662 (11%) donors with AKI. There were 3,259 (32%) all-cause graft failures, which included 1,509 deaths with functioning graft. After adjustment for donor, recipient and transplant characteristics, donor AKI was not associated with all-cause graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.11, 95% CI 0.99–1.26), death-censored graft failure (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.92–1.28), death (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.98–1.35) or graft failure when death was evaluated as a competing event (sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.07, 95% CI 0.91–1.26). Donor AKI was not associated with acute rejection but was associated with DGF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.27, 95% CI 1.92–2.68). Conclusion Donor AKI stage was not associated with any kidney transplant outcome, except DGF. Use of kidneys with AKI for transplantation appears to be justified.

scholarly journals The Lifetime Health Burden of Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 238146831878181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devin Incerti ◽  
Nicholas Summers ◽  
Thanh G. N. Ton ◽  
Audra Boscoe ◽  
Anil Chandraker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Transplant Recipient ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
The United States ◽  
Delayed Graft Function ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Health Burden

Background. Although delayed graft function (DGF) is associated with an increased risk of acute rejection and decreased graft survival, there are no estimates of the long-term or lifetime health burden of DGF. Objectives. To estimate the long-term and lifetime health burden of DGF, defined as the need for at least one dialysis session within the first week after transplantation, for a cohort representative of patients who had their first kidney transplant in 2014. Methods. Data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS; 2001–2014) were used to estimate a semi-Markov parametric multi-state model with three disease states. Maximum length of follow-up was 13.7 years, and a microsimulation model was used to extrapolate results over a lifetime. The impact of DGF was assessed by simulating the model for each patient in the cohort with and without DGF. Results. At the end of 13.7 years of follow-up, DGF reduces the probability of having a functioning graft from 52% to 32%, increases the probability of being on dialysis from 10% to 19%, and increases the probability of death from 38% to 50% relative to transplant recipients who do not experience DGF. A typical transplant recipient with DGF (median age = 53) is observed to lose 0.87 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Extrapolated over a lifetime, the same 53-year-old DGF patient is projected to lose 3.01 (95% confidence interval: 2.33, 3.70) QALYs relative to a transplant recipient with the same characteristics who does not experience DGF. Conclusions. The lifetime health burden of DGF is substantial. Understanding these consequences will help health care providers weigh kidney transplant decisions and inform policies for patients in the context of varying risks of DGF.

scholarly journals Degree of Glomerulosclerosis in Procurement Kidney Biopsies from Marginal Donor Kidneys and Their Implications in Predicting Graft Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1469
Author(s):  
Wisit Cheungpasitporn ◽  
Charat Thongprayoon ◽  
Pradeep K Vaitla ◽  
Api Chewcharat ◽  
Panupong Hansrivijit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Delayed Graft Function ◽  
Organ Shortage ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: This study aimed to assess the association between the percentage of glomerulosclerosis (GS) in procurement allograft biopsies from high-risk deceased donor and graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: The UNOS database was used to identify deceased-donor kidneys with a kidney donor profile index (KDPI) score > 85% from 2005 to 2014. Deceased donor kidneys were categorized based on the percentage of GS: 0–10%, 11–20%, >20% and no biopsy performed. The outcome included death-censored graft survival, patient survival, rate of delayed graft function, and 1-year acute rejection. Results: Of 22,006 kidneys, 91.2% were biopsied showing 0–10% GS (58.0%), 11–20% GS (13.5%), >20% GS (19.7%); 8.8% were not biopsied. The rate of kidney discard was 48.5%; 33.6% in 0–10% GS, 68.9% in 11–20% GS, and 77.4% in >20% GS. 49.8% of kidneys were discarded in those that were not biopsied. Death-censored graft survival at 5 years was 75.8% for 0–10% GS, 70.9% for >10% GS, and 74.8% for the no biopsy group. Among kidneys with >10% GS, there was no significant difference in death-censored graft survival between 11–20% GS and >20% GS. Recipients with >10% GS had an increased risk of graft failure (HR = 1.27, p < 0.001), compared with 0–10% GS. There was no significant difference in patient survival, acute rejection at 1-year, and delayed graft function between 0% and 10% GS and >10% GS. Conclusion: In >85% KDPI kidneys, our study suggested that discard rates increased with higher percentages of GS, and GS >10% is an independent prognostic factor for graft failure. Due to organ shortage, future studies are needed to identify strategies to use these marginal kidneys safely and improve outcomes.

scholarly journals Associations of pre-transplant anemia management with post-transplant delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 782-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miklos Z. Molnar ◽  
Csaba P. Kovesdy ◽  
Laszlo Rosivall ◽  
Suphamai Bunnapradist ◽  
Junichi Hoshino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Delayed Graft Function ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Anemia Management

Association of Factor V Leiden Mutation with Delayed Graft Function, Acute Rejection Episodes and Long-term Graft Dysfunction in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (02) ◽  
pp. 194-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Slowinski ◽  
Ingeborg Hauser ◽  
Birgit Vetter ◽  
Lutz Fritsche ◽  
Daniela Bachert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Graft Dysfunction ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation

SummaryWe analysed whether the factor V Leiden mutation – the most common hereditary predisposing factor for venous thrombosis – is associated with early and long-term graft dysfunction after kidney transplantation in 394 Caucasian kidney transplant recipients. The presence of factor V Leiden mutation was identified by allele specific PCR. The prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation was compared to 32216 unselected neonates. The prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation (GA genotype) was similar in 394 kidney transplant recipients and 32216 neonates. The frequency of known factors predicting long-term graft function were similar in patients with the GA genotype and with the normal factor V gene (GG genotype). The GA genotype was associated with the occurrence of no primary graft function (risk: 2.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-8.26; p < 0.05), the number of dialysis after transplantation in patients with no primary graft function until graft function (7.5 ± 2.06 dialysis in GA patients; 4.2 ± 0.36 dialyses in GG patients; p < 0.05), and the risk for at least one acute rejection episode (risk: 3.83; 95% confidence interval: 1.38-10.59; p < 0.02). The slope of 1/creatinine per year was significantly lower in patients with the GA genotype (GA patients: – 0.0204 ± 0.008 dl/mg per year; GG patients: 0.0104 ± 0.004 dl/mg per year; p < 0.02). The annual enhancement of the daily protein excretion rate was elevated in patients with the GA genotype (GA patients: 38.5 ± 16.6 mg/24 h per year; GG patients: 4.9 ± 4.4 mg/24 h per year; p < 0.02). Our study showed that the factor V Leiden mutation is associated with the occurrence of delayed graft function, acute rejection episodes and chronic graft dysfunction after kidney transplantation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document