scholarly journals High-resolution and high-definition anorectal manometry: rediscovering anorectal function

Author(s):  
Constanza Ciriza de los Ríos ◽  
Miguel Mínguez ◽  
Jose Mariaí Remes-Troche ◽  
Gl�ria Lacima
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Banasiuk ◽  
Magdalena Elżbieta Dobrowolska ◽  
Barbara Skowronska ◽  
Justyna Konys ◽  
Aleksandra Banaszkiewicz

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S318
Author(s):  
Gabriela Rojas-Loureiro ◽  
Fausto Daniel Garcia-Garcia ◽  
Paulo Cesar Gomez-Castaños ◽  
Mercedes Amieva-Balmori ◽  
Jose M. Remes Troche

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuelian Xiang ◽  
Dipesh H. Vasant ◽  
Mercedes Amieva-Balmori ◽  
Rachael Parr ◽  
Amol Sharma ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Myeongsook Seo ◽  
Segyeong Joo ◽  
Kee Wook Jung ◽  
Eun Mi Song ◽  
Satish S. C. Rao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Levy ◽  
Christopher M Navas ◽  
Joan A Chandra ◽  
Brock Christensen ◽  
Louis J Vaickus ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Evaluation for dyssynergia is the most common reason that gastroenterologists refer patients for anorectal manometry, because dyssynergia is amenable to biofeedback by physical therapists. High-definition anorectal manometry (3D-HDAM) is a promising technology to evaluate anorectal physiology, but adoption remains limited by its sheer complexity. We developed a 3D-HDAM deep learning algorithm to evaluate for dyssynergia. METHODS: Spatial-temporal data were extracted from consecutive 3D-HDAM studies performed between 2018-2020 at a tertiary institution. The technical procedure and gold standard definition of dyssynergia were based on the London consensus, adapted to the needs of 3D-HDAM technology. Three machine learning models were generated: (1) traditional machine learning informed by conventional anorectal function metrics, (2) deep learning, and (3) a hybrid approach. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using bootstrap sampling to calculate area-under-the-curve (AUC). To evaluate overfitting, models were validated by adding 502 simulated defecation maneuvers with diagnostic ambiguity. RESULTS: 302 3D-HDAM studies representing 1,208 simulated defecation maneuvers were included (average age 55.2 years; 80.5% women). The deep learning model had comparable diagnostic accuracy (AUC=0.91 [95% confidence interval 0.89-0.93]) to traditional (AUC=0.93[0.92-0.95]) and hybrid (AUC=0.96[0.94-0.97]) predictive models in training cohorts. However, the deep learning model handled ambiguous tests more cautiously than other models; the deep learning model was more likely to designate an ambiguous test as inconclusive (odds ratio=4.21[2.78-6.38]) versus traditional/hybrid approaches. CONCLUSIONS: By considering complex spatial-temporal information beyond conventional anorectal function metrics, deep learning on 3D-HDAM technology may enable gastroenterologists to reliably identify and manage dyssynergia in broader practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document