scholarly journals To Reassemble Capitalism: Economic Sociology and its “Political Unconscious.” On “Political Economy after Neoliberalism” by Neil Fligstein and Steven Vogel

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Zhikharevich ◽  
David Khumaryan
2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 5-18
Author(s):  
Alpár Losoncz

Karl Polanyi’s works have been widely thematized regarding the transition in Central and Eastern Europe. The transition was viewed as the “second great transformation”. Polanyi’s works undoubtedly have numerous followers and it is owing to them that his works have started to be critically interpreted. We are here considering the possibility of reconceptualization of the works after the crisis of neoliberalism. The paper consists of three parts, each focusing on the selected points of Polanyi’s work. In the first part, the goal was to confront Polanyi’s thought with the consequences of neoliberalism; this part is explicitly involved in politicaleconomic reflection. The second part focuses on the discussion about the meaning of embeddedness, and the third part shows the relevance of some reflexions with respect to the money. The second and third part make a dialogue between political economy and economic sociology, economic anthropology, and economic theory.


Author(s):  
Richard Swedberg

This article discusses the tool kit of economic sociology. It begins by examining two of the most important concepts in modern economic sociology, namely: embeddedness and field. It is followed by a discussion of a sociological concept of interest and an interest-based concept of institutions. The article also presents some arguments posed in the text, one of which states that economic sociology would do well in some respects to follow the example of political economy and pay more attention to analytical economics and its general approach.


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-29
Author(s):  
Martijn Konings

For some decades now, progressively minded social scientists have argued that markets are too important to leave to economists — indeed, entire new subfields have formed in response to this concern. But this engagement with economic life has often been somewhat half-hearted. Particularly telling in this respect is the fact that these new fields have organized themselves centrally around the rejection of ‘economism’ — the idea that markets have self-regulatory properties. Scholars in fields such as political economy and economic sociology have devoted a great deal of energy to normative critiques of the market, but they have displayed much less interest in rethinking the core categories and principles of economic life itself. What the books considered here have in common, and what sets them apart from established ways of thinking, is a willingness to tarry with the paradoxes of money.


2000 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad Christerson

This paper integrates the concept of “embeddedness” from economic sociology into the global political economy perspective in order to understand the effects of foreign investment on development. 604 foreign invested enterprises in China are used to test whether or not foreign investment that is embedded in ethnic ties leads to more positive development outcomes than those produced by investment not embedded in these institutions. The analysis concludes that foreign investment that is embedded in ethnic ties leads to greater linkages to local firms and more high-value activities being transferred to the investee nation. The article concludes by arguing for a greater integration of the economic sociology and global political economy literatures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document