scholarly journals MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING PROCEDURES USING XENOGENEIC CORTICO-CANCELLOUS GRAFT MATERIAL WITH SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT: A 1- TO 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan KILINÇ ◽  
Mert ATAOL ◽  
Ertunç DAYI
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Sinus Lifting

‘Butterfly’: a residual bone independent technique for one-stage sinus lift

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e236245
Author(s):  
Iulian Filipov ◽  
Federico Bolognesi ◽  
Lucian Chirila
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Sinus Lift ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Independent Technique ◽  
Sinus Lifting

A 29-year-old woman with an extreme pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus and a missing molar was treated with one-stage sinus lifting and implant placement in a novel surgical approach.

scholarly journals Maxillary sinus lifting using Osseodensification: Cynosure of the implant domain

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
Sumit Munjal ◽  
Seema Munjal
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Sinus Lift ◽  
Minimally Invasive Approach ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Platelet Rich Fibrin ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Sinus Lifting

The posterior maxilla is indubitably the site reported with highest failures in implant literature so far as the bone availability beneath the sinus poses a major challenge for surgeons. Sinus lift both by direct and various indirect accesses were hitherto utilized to counter the compromising situation. But the risk of implant failure if the implant was simultaneously placed besides the parasthesia, perforation and morbidity were experienced more with more the cases documented. The osseodensification(OD), a relatively new technique provides a minimally invasive approach along with feasibility where the above-mentioned other modalities are contraindicated. The present article presents the novel case of indirect sinus lift with OD concept and simultaneous implant placement using an adjunct PRF (Platelet-rich fibrin).

scholarly journals Vertical Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Technique for Stabilizing Bone Grafts in the Atrophic Maxilla with Simultaneous Implant Placement

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 333-338
Author(s):  
B Lofano ◽  
R Luongo ◽  
G Bianco ◽  
A Lofano ◽  
A Vantaggiato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Ridge Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Atrophic Maxilla ◽  
Single Implant

Achieving adequate fixation of bone blocks harvested from the mandibular symphysis and used in conjunction with dental implants has been a continuing challenge. In response, the Authors developed a method of using the implant itself to stabilize the graft material in single-implant sites in severely resorbed alveolar ridges. This technique was utilized to place 19 standard implants in 15 patients. After 12 to 60 months of clinical and radiological follow-up, all implants had survived, a success rate of 100%. Measurements of the radiographs showed bone loss of 1.70 mm ± 0.4 mm.

scholarly journals Preliminary Study with the Use of a Titanium Mesh as Space Maker and Implant Primary Stabilization for One-Stage Sinus Lift in Cases with Less Than 1.5 mm Residual Bone

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4853
Author(s):  
Iulian Filipov ◽  
Federico Bolognesi ◽  
Lucian Chirila ◽  
Corina Marilena Cristache ◽  
Giuseppe Corinaldesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Healing Period ◽  
Sinus Lifting ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Preliminary Study ◽  
Bone Height

(1) Background: In the lateral area of the maxilla, the alveolar bone can lose significant volume due to maxillary sinus pneumatization following teeth extractions. This preliminary study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel technique for one-stage sinus lifting and simultaneous implant placement in cases with less than 1.5 mm residual alveolar bone. The subsequent survival rate at 1-year post-occlusal loading was assessed. (2) Methods: 15 patients were selected, the main inclusion criteria were the partially edentulous area in the posterior maxilla with alveolar bone height of less than 1.5 mm below the sinus. All of the patients underwent one-stage sinus lifting, along with simultaneous implant placement using a “butterfly” anchorage device to optimize the primary stability and xenograft bone as graft material. At 6 to 9 months after surgery, the anchorage device was removed and implants were loaded. Panoramic x-ray images were used to assess the new bone formation, while the biological stability was measured using resonance frequency analysis. (3) Results: 15 implants were inserted. The mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) value was 71.3 (SD = ±2.51) and the mean healing period was 7.3 (SD = ±1.23) months. The mean bone height after the healing period was 14.4 (SD = ±2.05). A statistically significant correlation was found between the healing period and the ISQ value (Spearman rho = 0.684, sig. = 0.005). No statistically significant correlation was found between the ISQ value and the new regenerated bone height (Person r = 0.389, sig. = 0.152). Smoking was identified as a risk factor involved in postoperative complications. (4) Conclusions: The results of the present preliminary study demonstrated that the proposed “butterfly” technique was effective when performing one-stage sinus lifting and simultaneous implant placement in cases with less than 1.5 mm of residual alveolar bone. The survival rate was 100% at 1-year post occlusal loading.

scholarly journals PALATAL VERSUS BUCCAL ANTRAL APPROACH FOR MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING AND IMPLANT PLACEMENT

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-45
Author(s):  
Omar N. EL-prince ◽  
Abdelaziz F. Khalil ◽  
Ahmed M. EL-sabbagh ◽  
Magued H. Fahmy
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Sinus Lifting
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document