scholarly journals Improvisation of Shell Side Heat Transfer Coefficient in Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers using Different Configurations – A Mini Review

2015 ◽  
Vol V4 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meda Kalyan Kumar ◽  
Manasa Kishtapati ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Shell Side ◽  
Shell And Tube

An Experimental Study of Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers With Continuous Helical Baffles

2007 ◽  
Vol 129 (10) ◽  
pp. 1425-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Peng ◽  
Q. W. Wang ◽  
C. Zhang ◽  
G. N. Xie ◽  
L. Q. Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Tube Bundle ◽  
Shell Side ◽  
Helical Baffle ◽  
Shell And Tube

Two shell-and-tube heat exchangers (STHXs) using continuous helical baffles instead of segmental baffles used in conventional STHXs were proposed, designed, and tested in this study. The two proposed STHXs have the same tube bundle but different shell configurations. The flow pattern in the shell side of the heat exchanger with continuous helical baffles was forced to be rotational and helical due to the geometry of the continuous helical baffles, which results in a significant increase in heat transfer coefficient per unit pressure drop in the heat exchanger. Properly designed continuous helical baffles can reduce fouling in the shell side and prevent the flow-induced vibration as well. The performance of the proposed STHXs was studied experimentally in this work. The heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop in the new STHXs were compared with those in the STHX with segmental baffles. The results indicate that the use of continuous helical baffles results in nearly 10% increase in heat transfer coefficient compared with that of conventional segmental baffles for the same shell-side pressure drop. Based on the experimental data, the nondimensional correlations for heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop were developed for the proposed continuous helical baffle heat exchangers with different shell configurations, which might be useful for industrial applications and further study of continuous helical baffle heat exchangers. This paper also presents a simple and feasible method to fabricate continuous helical baffles used for STHXs.

Numerical simulation of the effect of baffle cut and baffle spacing on shell side heat exchanger performance using CFD

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Swanand Gaikwad ◽  
Ashish Parmar
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Numerical Results ◽  
Shell Side ◽  
Tube Heat Exchanger ◽  
Shell And Tube ◽  
Two Parameters

AbstractHeat exchangers possess a significant role in energy transmission and energy generation in most industries. In this work, a three-dimensional simulation has been carried out of a shell and tube heat exchanger (STHX) consisting of segmental baffles. The investigation involves using the commercial code of ANSYS CFX, which incorporates the modeling, meshing, and usage of the Finite Element Method to yield numerical results. Much work is available in the literature regarding the effect of baffle cut and baffle spacing as two different entities, but some uncertainty pertains when we discuss the combination of these two parameters. This study aims to find an appropriate mix of baffle cut and baffle spacing for the efficient functioning of a shell and tube heat exchanger. Two parameters are tested: the baffle cuts at 30, 35, 40% of the shell-inside diameter, and the baffle spacing’s to fit 6,8,10 baffles within the heat exchanger. The numerical results showed the role of the studied parameters on the shell side heat transfer coefficient and the pressure drop in the shell and tube heat exchanger. The investigation shows an increase in the shell side heat transfer coefficient of 13.13% when going from 6 to 8 baffle configuration and a 23.10% acclivity for the change of six baffles to 10, for a specific baffle cut. Evidence also shows a rise in the pressure drop with an increase in the baffle spacing from the ranges of 44–46.79%, which can be controlled by managing the baffle cut provided.

The Effect of Baffles in Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers

2009 ◽  
Vol 62-64 ◽  
pp. 694-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Akpabio ◽  
I.O. Oboh ◽  
E.O. Aluyor
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Proper Position ◽  
Process Industries ◽  
Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Shell And Tube ◽  
Optimal Values ◽  
Side Flow

Shell and tube heat exchangers in their various construction modifications are probably the most widespread and commonly used basic heat exchanger configuration in the process industries. There are many modifications of the basic configuration which can be used to solve special problems. Baffles serve two functions: Most importantly, they support the tubes in the proper position during assembly and operation and prevent vibration of the tubes caused by flow-induced eddies, and secondly, they guide the shell-side flow back and forth across the tube field, increasing the velocity and the heat transfer coefficient. The objective of this paper is to find the baffle spacing at fixed baffle cut that will give us the optimal values for the overall heat transfer coefficient. To do this Microsoft Excel 2003 package was employed. The results obtained from previous studies showed that to obtain optimal values for the overall heat transfer coefficient for the shell and tube heat exchangers a baffle cut of 20 to 25 percent of the diameter is common and the maximum spacing depends on how much support the tubes need. This was used to validate the results obtained from this study.

Performance Study of Heat Exchangers with Continuous Helical Baffles on Different Inclination Angles

2013 ◽  
Vol 655-657 ◽  
pp. 461-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Fang Song
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Performance Study ◽  
Three Dimensional Model ◽  
Shell Side ◽  
Inclination Angles

The three-dimensional model of heat exchangers with continuous helical baffles was built. The fluid flow dynamics and heat transfer of shell side in the helical baffled heat exchanger were simulated and calculated. The velocity, pressure and temperature distributions were achieved. The simulation shows that with the same baffle pitch, shell-side heat transfer coefficient increased by 25% and the pressure drop decreases by 18% in helical baffled heat exchanger compared with segmental helical baffles. With the analyzing of the flow and heat transfer in heat exchanger in 5 different inclination angles from 11°to 21°, it can be found that both shell side heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop will reduce respectively by 86% and 52% with the increases 11°to 21°of the inclination angles. Numerical simulation provided reliable theoretical reference for further engineering research of heat exchanger with helical baffles.

Thermal Performance Enhancement of an Industrial Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadi A. Ghaith ◽  
Ahmed S. Izhar
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Thermal Performance ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Thermal Design ◽  
Shell Side ◽  
Tube Heat Exchanger ◽  
Shell And Tube

This paper aims to enhance the thermal performance of an industrial shell-and-tube heat exchanger utilized for the purpose of cooling raw natural gas by means of mixture of Sales gas. The main objective of this work is to provide an optimum and reliable thermal design of a single-shelled finned tubes heat exchanger to replace the existing two- shell and tube heat exchanger due to the space limitations in the plant. A comprehensive thermal model was developed using the effectiveness-NTU method. The shell-side and tube-side overall heat transfer coefficient were determined using Bell-Delaware method and Dittus-Boelter correlation, respectively. The obtained results showed that the required area to provide a thermal duty of 1.4 MW is about 1132 m2 with tube-side and shell-side heat transfer coefficients of 950 W/m2K and 495 W/m2K, respectively. In order to verify the obtained results generated from the mathematical model, a numerical study was carried out using HTRI software which showed a good match in terms of the heat transfer area and the tube-side heat transfer coefficient.

Shell Side Flow and Heat Transfer Performances of Trisection Helical Baffle Heat Exchangers

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaping Chen ◽  
Cong Dong ◽  
Jiafeng Wu
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Incline Angle ◽  
Shell Side ◽  
Single Vortex ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Helical Baffle ◽  
Side Flow

The flow and heat transfer performances of three trisection helical baffle heat exchangers with different baffle shapes and assembly configurations, and a continuous helical baffle scheme with approximate spiral pitch were numerically simulated. The four schemes are two trisection helical baffle schemes of baffle incline angle of 20° with a circumferential overlap baffle scheme (20°TCO) and a end-to-end helical baffle scheme (20°TEE), a trisection mid-overlap helical baffle scheme with baffle incline angle of 36.2° (36.2°TMO), and a continuous helical baffle scheme with baffle helix angle of 16.8° (18.4°CH). The pressure or velocity nephograms with superimposed velocity vectors for meridian slice M1, transverse slices f and f1, and unfolded concentric hexagonal slices H2 and H3 are presented. The Dean vortex secondary flow field, which is one of the key mechanisms of enhancing heat transfer in heat exchangers, is clearly depicted showing a single vortex is formed in each baffle pitch cycle. The leakage patterns are demonstrated clearly on the unfolded concentric hexagonal slices. The results show that the 20°TCO and 18.4°CH schemes rank the first and second in shell-side heat transfer coefficient and comprehensive indexes ho/Δpo and ho/Δpo1/3. The 20°TEE scheme without circumferential overlap is considerably inferior to the 20°TCO scheme. The 36.2°TMO scheme is the worst in both shell-side heat transfer coefficient and comprehensive index ho/Δpo1/3.

3-D Numerical Study on Shell-Side Comprehensive Performance of Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger With Combined Helical Baffles

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guidong Chen ◽  
Jing Xu ◽  
Ming Zen ◽  
Qiuwang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Shell Side ◽  
Tube Heat Exchanger ◽  
Comprehensive Performance ◽  
Shell And Tube ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient

In order to improve heat transfer performance of conventional segmental baffled shell-and-tube heat exchangers (STHXs), the shell-and-tube heat exchanger with combined helical baffles (CMH-STHX) were invented. In the present study, the CMH-STHX is compared with three other STHXs which were set up with continuous helical baffles (CH-STHX), discontinuous helical baffles (DCH-STHX) and segmental baffles (SG-STHX), by Computational Fluid Dynamics method. The numerical results show that, for the same mass flow rate at the shell side, the overall pressure drop of the CMH-STHX is about 50% and 40% lower than that of SG-STHX and CH-STHX. The heat transfer coefficient of the CMH-STHX is between those of CH-STHX and DCH-STHX and it is 6.3% lower than that of SG-STHX. The heat transfer coefficient under unit pressure drop h/Δp is introduced to evaluate the comprehensive performance of STHXs. The h/Δp of the CMH-STHX is 7.5%, 6.5% and 87.4% higher on average than those of the CH-SHTX, DCH-STHX and SG-STHX. Furthermore, the total heat transfer rate of CMH-STHX is about 25% higher than that of SG-STHX for the same total pressure drop of shell side. Supported by these results, the new heat exchanger (CMH-STHX) may be used to replace the conventional shell-and-tube heat exchanger in industrial applications.

Experimental Study on Shell Side Heat Transfer Performance of Circumferential Overlap Trisection Helical Baffle Heat Exchangers

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaping Chen ◽  
Ruibing Cao ◽  
Jiafeng Wu ◽  
Cong Dong ◽  
Yanjun Sheng
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Shell Side ◽  
Single Thread ◽  
Helical Baffle ◽  
Inclined Angle

A set of experiments were conducted on the circumferential overlap trisection helical baffle heat exchangers with inclined angles of 20°, 24°, 28° and 32° single-thread and inclined angle of 32° dual-thread one, and a segmental baffle heat exchanger as a contrast scheme. The cylinder case of the testing heat exchanger is a common shell, while the tube bundle core could be replaced. The shell side heat transfer coefficient ho is obtained by subtract tube-side convection thermal resistance and tube wall conduction resistance from the overall heat transfer coefficient K. The curves of shell side heat transfer coefficient ho, pressure drop Δpo, Nusselt number Nuo, and axial Euler number Euz,o are presented versus axial Reynolds number Rez,o. A comprehensive performance index Nuo/Euz,o is suggested to demonstrate the integral properties of both heat transfer and flow resistance of different schemes, and the curves of Nuo/Euz,o versus Rez,o of the different schemes are presented. The results show that the scheme with inclined angle 20° performs better than other schemes, and the scheme with inclined angle 24° ranks the second, however the segment scheme ranks the last. The curves of Nuo/Euz,o of both schemes with inclined angle 32° of single-thread and dual-thread are almost coincident, even though their heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop curves are quite different. The results indicate also that for the circumferential overlap trisection helical baffle schemes the optimal inclined angle is around 20° instead of around 40° as rated by many literatures for the quadrant helical baffle schemes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document