Application of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of persistent pain in failed back surgery syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-49
Author(s):  
A. В. Dmitriev ◽  
D. A. Rzaev ◽  
N. P. Denisova
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Neurogenic Pain ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

The study objectiveis to demonstrate our experience of the spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of drug-resistant pain in patients with the failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and to evaluate its effectiveness and complications.Materials and methods.Systems for chronic spinal cord stimulation were implanted in 78 patients suffering from FBSS in Federal Neurosurgical Center (Novosibirsk) during 2013–2015. All patients had a drug-resistant neurogenic pain syndrome character and were undergone surgical intervention on the spine. Evaluating of the treatment effectiveness was carried out by visual analogue scale (VAS) and a scale Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4). Catamnesis ranged from 6 to 18 months.Results.The median preoperative VAS score evaluation was 6.7, at hospital discharge – 3.1, after 6 months – 3.2, after 12 months – 3.5, after 18 months – 3.4. Evaluation on a scale DN4 before surgery was 5.3, at hospital discharge – 2.1, after 6 months – 2.4, after 12 months – 2.5, after 18 months – 2.4. Complications in the form of migration, fracture of the electrodes and development of hemorrhage or inflammation at the site of implantation of the system were observed in 12 (15.3 %) cases and required revision surgery.Conclusion.Spinal stimulation is an effective and safe method of treatment of pain in FBSS, but it has specific complications associated with implantable systems.

95. Effect of spinal cord stimulation on balance and gait in failed back surgery syndrome patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. S46
Author(s):  
Ram Haddas ◽  
Isador H. Lieberman ◽  
Donna D. Ohnmeiss ◽  
Ralph F. Rashbaum
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Defining minimal clinically important differences in pain and disability outcomes of patients with chronic pain treated with spinal cord stimulation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Shelby Sabourin ◽  
Justin Tram ◽  
Breanna L. Sheldon ◽  
Julie G. Pilitsis
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Catastrophizing ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Mcgill Pain Questionnaire ◽  
Minimum Detectable Change ◽  
Failed Back Surgery

OBJECTIVE Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds for a limited number of outcome metrics were previously defined for patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) at 6 months after spinal cord stimulation (SCS). This study aimed to further define MCID values for pain and disability outcomes. Additionally, the authors established 1-year MCID values for outcome measures with previously defined metrics commonly used to assess SCS efficacy. METHODS Preoperative and 1-year postoperative outcomes were collected from 114 patients who received SCS therapy for FBSS, complex regional pain syndrome, and neuropathic pain. MCID values were established for the numerical rating scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Four established anchor-based methods were utilized to compute MCID values with two anchored questions: “Are you satisfied with SCS therapy?” and “Would you have SCS surgery again?” For each question, patients were categorized as responders if they answered “yes” or as nonresponders if they responded “no.” The methodologies utilized to compute MCID scores included the average change method, minimum detectable change approach, change difference calculation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis has been shown to inform the accuracy at which the MCID value can distinguish responders from nonresponders and was analyzed for each instrument. RESULTS For the first time, ranges of MCID values after SCS were established for MPQ (1–2.3) and PCS (1.9–13.6). One-year MCID values were defined for all indications: NRS (range 0.9–2.7), ODI (3.5–6.9), and BDI (2–5.9). AUC values were significant for NRS (0.78, p < 0.001), ODI (0.71, p = 0.003), MPQ (0.74, p < 0.001), and PCS (0.77, p < 0.001), indicating notable accuracy for distinguishing satisfied patients. CONCLUSIONS This was the first study to successfully determine MCID values for two prominent instruments, MPQ and PCS, used to assess pain after SCS surgery. Additionally, previously established MCID values for ODI, BDI, and the visual analog scale for patients with FBSS at 6 months after treatment were explored at 12 months for the most common indications for SCS. These data may better inform physicians of patient response to and success with SCS therapy.

scholarly journals Functional connectivity and structural analysis of trial spinal cord stimulation responders in failed back surgery syndrome

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e0228306
Author(s):  
Peter A. Pahapill ◽  
Guangyu Chen ◽  
Elsa V. Arocho-Quinones ◽  
Andrew S. Nencka ◽  
Shi-Jiang Li
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Structural Analysis ◽  
Functional Connectivity ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

scholarly journals High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at T9/10 in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Higashiyama ◽  
Takuro Endo ◽  
Taku Sugawara
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

Abstract INTRODUCTION Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment option for low back pain and radicular leg pain of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). In a recent study, high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HFSCS) was found to be more effective in treating chronic pain than traditional paresthesia-based low-frequency SCS (paresthesia SCS). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of paresthesia SCS and HFSCS in improving outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of patients who underwent paresthesia SCS or HFSCS between September 2016 and January 2019. Paresthesia SCS is generally characterized by programming stimulation parameters such that the patient experiences paresthesia, and the paresthesia topography overlaps the pain topography as much as possible. The patient in HFSCS had a placement of cylindrical lead at levels T9-10. Patients were programmed with the electrode overlying the inferior endplate of T9 (+) and the electrode overlying the superior endplate of T10 (–). RESULTS A total of 14 patients (4 males, 10 females) underwent paresthesia SCS implantation. Mean age was 77.2 ± 9.6 yr. A total of 5 patients (2 males, 3 females) underwent HFSCS implantation. Mean age was 78.2 ± 7.5 yr. Operative time was shorter for the HFSCS group compared to the paresthesia SCS group (53.4 ± 4.8 min vs 82.9 ± 20.3 min, respectively; P < .001). A total of 5 out of 5 patients in the HFSCS group (100%) and 10 out of 14 patients in the paresthesia SCS group (71.4%) achieved the outcome of 50% pain relief (P = .25) CONCLUSION To confirm paresthesia during the procedure in the elderly may be complicated by hearing/language difficulties or by sedative-related confusion. Compared to paresthesia SCS, HFSCS allows for lower operative times and a more efficient and accurate positioning of the electrodes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document