scholarly journals Mapping the Landscape of Health Information Exchange (HIE) Networks in the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 483-514
Author(s):  
Zuan Sun ◽  
◽  
Deborah Compeau ◽  
Michelle Carter ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Health Information Exchange ◽  
The United States

Regional and Community Health Information Exchange in the United States

2011 ◽  
pp. 198-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi V. Gundlapalli ◽  
Jonathan H. Reid ◽  
Jan Root ◽  
Wu Xu
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Health Information Exchange ◽  
Business Case ◽  
The United States ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Secure Information

A fundamental premise of continuity in patient care and safety suggests timely sharing of health information among different providers at the point of care and after the visit. In most healthcare systems, this is achieved through exchange of written medical information, phone calls and conversations. In an ideal world, this exchange of health information between disparate providers, healthcare systems, laboratories, pharmacies and payers would be achieved electronically and seamlessly. The potential benefits of electronic health exchange are improved patient care, increased efficiency of the healthcare system and decreased costs. The reality is that health information is electronically exchanged only to a limited extent within local communities and regions, much less nationally and internationally. One main challenge has been the inability of health information exchange organizations to develop a solid business case. Other challenges have been socio-political in that data ownership and stewardship have not been clearly resolved. Technological improvements over the past 20 years have provided significant advances towards safe and secure information exchange. This chapter provides a general overview of community health information exchange in the United States of America, its history and details of challenges faced by stakeholders. The lessons learned from successes and failures, research and knowledge gaps and future prospects are also discussed. Current and future technologies to facilitate and invigorate health information exchange are highlighted. Two examples of successful regional health information exchanges in the US states of Utah and Indiana are highlighted.

Regional and Community Health Information Exchange in the United States

2011 ◽  
pp. 1470-1490
Author(s):  
Adi V. Gundlapalli ◽  
Jonathan H. Reid ◽  
Jan Root ◽  
Wu Xu
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Health Information Exchange ◽  
Business Case ◽  
The United States ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Secure Information

A fundamental premise of continuity in patient care and safety suggests timely sharing of health information among different providers at the point of care and after the visit. In most healthcare systems, this is achieved through exchange of written medical information, phone calls and conversations. In an ideal world, this exchange of health information between disparate providers, healthcare systems, laboratories, pharmacies and payers would be achieved electronically and seamlessly. The potential benefits of electronic health exchange are improved patient care, increased efficiency of the healthcare system and decreased costs. The reality is that health information is electronically exchanged only to a limited extent within local communities and regions, much less nationally and internationally. One main challenge has been the inability of health information exchange organizations to develop a solid business case. Other challenges have been socio-political in that data ownership and stewardship have not been clearly resolved. Technological improvements over the past 20 years have provided significant advances towards safe and secure information exchange. This chapter provides a general overview of community health information exchange in the United States of America, its history and details of challenges faced by stakeholders. The lessons learned from successes and failures, research and knowledge gaps and future prospects are also discussed. Current and future technologies to facilitate and invigorate health information exchange are highlighted. Two examples of successful regional health information exchanges in the US states of Utah and Indiana are highlighted.

An Interpretive Study of Critical Issues in Electronic Health Information Exchange

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherrie Drye Cannoy
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Health Information Exchange ◽  
The United States ◽  
Interpretive Study ◽  
Critical Issues ◽  
Electronic Health Information

In this paper, the author examines the critical issues that have emerged in the area of electronic healthcare information exchange (HIE) in the United States. An interpretive, longitudinal study was conducted over a total of four years through a study of seven field cases. This paper aggregates findings from these seven efforts into one research study for a more comprehensive view of HIE issues. The findings provide a framework for understanding the issues of HIE for researchers and practitioners. Research, teaching, and practitioner implications are discussed.

Patients' Perceptions of Different Information Exchange Mechanisms: An Exploratory Study in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (04/05) ◽  
pp. 162-178
Author(s):  
Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
The United States ◽  
Exchange Mechanism ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Security Risks ◽  
Direct Exchange

Abstract Background Patients may seek health care services from various providers during treatment. These providers could serve in a network (affiliated) or practice separately (unaffiliated). Thus, using secure and reliable health information exchange (HIE) mechanisms would be critical to transfer sensitive personal health information (PHI) across distances. Studying patients' perceptions and opinions about exchange mechanisms could help health care providers build more complete HIEs' databases and develop robust privacy policies, consent processes, and patient education programs. Objectives Due to the exploratory nature of this study, we aim to shed more light on public perspectives (benefits, concerns, and risks) associated with the four data exchange practices in the health care sector. Methods In this study, we compared public perceptions and expectations regarding four common types of exchange mechanisms used in the United States (i.e., traditional, direct, query-based, patient-mediated exchange mechanisms). Traditional is an exchange through fax, paper mailing, or phone calls, direct is a provider-to-provider exchange, query-based is sharing patient data with a central repository, and patient-mediated is an exchange mechanism in which patients can access data and monitor sharing. Data were collected from 1,624 subjects using an online survey to examine the benefits, risks, and concerns associated with the four exchange mechanisms from patients' perspectives. Results Findings indicate that several concerns and risks such as privacy concerns, security risks, trust issues, and psychological risks are raised. Besides, multiple benefits such as access to complete information, communication improvement, timely and convenient information sharing, cost-saving, and medical error reduction are highlighted by respondents. Through consideration of all risks and benefits associated with the four exchange mechanisms, the direct HIE mechanism was selected by respondents as the most preferred mechanism of information exchange among providers. More than half of the respondents (56.18%) stated that overall they favored direct exchange over the other mechanisms. 42.70% of respondents expected to be more likely to share their PHI with health care providers who implemented and utilized a direct exchange mechanism. 43.26% of respondents believed that they would support health care providers to leverage a direct HIE mechanism for sharing their PHI with other providers. The results exhibit that individuals expect greater benefits and fewer adverse effects from direct HIE among health care providers. Overall, the general public sentiment is more in favor of direct data transfer. Our results highlight that greater public trust in exchange mechanisms is required, and information privacy and security risks must be addressed before the widespread implementation of such mechanisms. Conclusion This exploratory study's findings could be interesting for health care providers and HIE policymakers to analyze how consumers perceive the current exchange mechanisms, what concerns should be addressed, and how the exchange mechanisms could be modified to meet consumers' needs.

A Viewpoint of Security for Digital Health Care in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Demurjian ◽  
Alberto De la Rosa Algarín ◽  
Jinbo Bi ◽  
Solomon Berhe ◽  
Thomas Agresta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hard Copy ◽  
Health Providers ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Health Records

In health care, patient information of interest to health providers, researchers, public health researchers, insurers, patients, etc., is stored in different locations via electronic media and/or hard-copy formats. All potential users need electronic access to health information technology systems such as: electronic health records, personal health records, patient portals, and ancillary systems such as imaging, laboratory, pharmacy, etc. Controlling access to information from multiple systems requires granularity levels of privileges ranging from one patient to a cohort to an entire population. In this paper, we present a viewpoint of the state of secure digital health care in the United States, focusing on the resources that need to be protected as dictated by legal entities and regulations, the available approaches in the present state-of-the art, and, the potential needs for the future of security for digital health care. By utilizing a real world scenario, the authors explore the limitations of health information exchange in the United States, and present one possible architecture for secure digital health care that builds on existing technology alternatives.

scholarly journals State of the Art in Clinical Informatics: Evidence and Examples

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. McCoy ◽  
A. Wright ◽  
G. Eysenbach ◽  
B. A. Malin ◽  
E. S. Patterson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Information ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Health Informatics ◽  
Health Information Exchange ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Clinical Informatics ◽  
Privacy And Security ◽  
Health Records

Summary Objective: The field of clinical informatics has expanded substantially in the six decades since its inception. Early research focused on simple demonstrations that health information technology (HIT) such as electronic health records (EHRs), computerized provider order entry (CPOE), and clinical decision support (CDS) systems were feasible and potentially beneficial in clinical practice. Methods: In this review, we present recent evidence on clinical informatics in the United States covering three themes: 1) clinical informatics systems and interventions for providers, including EHRs, CPOE, CDS, and health information exchange; 2) consumer health informatics systems, including personal health records and web-based and mobile HIT; and 3) methods and governance for clinical informatics, including EHR usability; data mining, text mining, natural language processing, privacy, and security. Results: Substantial progress has been made in demonstrating that various clinical informatics methodologies and applications improve the structure, process, and outcomes of various facets of the healthcare system. Conclusion: Over the coming years, much more will be expected from the field. As we move past the “early adopters” in Rogers' diffusion of innovations' curve through the “early majority” and into the “late majority,” there will be a crucial need for new research methodologies and clinical applications that have been rigorously demonstrated to work (i.e., to improve health outcomes) in multiple settings with different types of patients and clinicians.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document