scholarly journals PARTICIPATION OF UNIVERSITIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITIES

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 210-212
Author(s):  
N. A. Khramtsova ◽  
K. B. Rybakova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Public Research ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Research Systems ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Over Time

The centrality of universities in public research systems has grown over time as interactions with industry take place. This interaction poses two problems. One concerns individual scientists and the potential trade-off between core research activities and those required to successfully develop and commercialize scientific inventions. A second dilemma arises with the tension between the industry's need to rely on clear and solid intellectual property rights and the totality of scientific enterprises.

Institutional complementarities, intellectual property rights and technology in the knowledge economy

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 565-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
ERKAN GÜRPINAR
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Knowledge Economy ◽  
Skilled Workers ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Job Match ◽  
Knowledge Content ◽  
Job Termination ◽  
Relative Profitability

AbstractThis essay explores the trade-off between strong and weak intellectual property rights inside firms with reference to the importance of job termination. The probability of job termination has an effect on the relative profitability of different intellectual property rights regimes. Weak intellectual property rights may make it more attractive for skilled workers to join the firm, which will increase its profits while employing workers. However, when a job match is terminated the firm is left with the ownership of intellectual property only under a strong intellectual property rights regime. Based on the institutional complementarities approach we develop a simple model that analyses this trade-off, in which multiple organisational equilibria exist. We show that when intellectual property rights are taken into account, expectations such as increase in the skill and knowledge content of work are not inevitable in the knowledge economy.

scholarly journals Recent Development of the Intellectual Property Rights System in China and Challenges Ahead

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Can Huang
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Time Span ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Us ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Ipr Protection

As Peng, Ahlstrom, Carraher, and Shi (2017) rightly noted, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) protection in a country is not static. It evolves over time. Peng et al. (this issue) revealed through their historical analysis that during the 19th century, the US was not a leading IPR advocate but a leading IPR violator. It was only when indigenous inventors, authors, and organizations of the US emerged and demanded protection of their IPR in foreign countries in the late 19th century that the US passed the International Copyright Act (the Chace Act) in 1891 to extend IPR protection to foreign works. The US case illustrated that a country's IPR system as an institution evolves as its economy and society develop. If we examine this evolution over a relatively long time span, the change can be quite dramatic. Therefore, when reviewing a country's IPR system, an important question to be asked is in which direction the country's IPR system evolves.

scholarly journals “ANALYSING CORE THEMES AND CO-AUTHOR PATTERNS ON THE CONNECTION BETWEEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND SOCIAL ENTERPRISES”

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 5290-5299
Author(s):  
Young-Chool Choi
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Social Enterprise ◽  
Environmental Changes ◽  
Social Enterprises ◽  
Joint Research ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
The Impact

This study focuses on deriving key issues relating to social enterprises and intellectual property rights using text mining methods, and analysing the co-author patterns of researchers working in these fields. For this purpose, the Netminer program was used to analyse journal papers published by Springer Publishing. As a result of the analysis, the research topics relating to social enterprises and intellectual property rights were, by way of a theoretical framework, classified according to nine issues: the management model of social enterprises; social enterprises and NGOs; the supply chain of social enterprises; the impact of social enterprises; environmental changes in social enterprises; social entrepreneurship; social enterprise and education; the social enterprise ecosystem; and social enterprises and NGOs.. These nine key issues represent areas of great importance in terms of business activities that link social enterprises and intellectual property rights. Contrastingly, examination of the co-author patterns of authors discussing social enterprises and intellectual property rights suggests that those employing multi-disciplinary approaches should engage more actively in joint research activities. Though such authors have achieved notable results to date, their engaging more actively in joint research activities should enhance the success of policies linking social enterprises and intellectual property rights.

Intellectual Property Rights Protection

2021 ◽  
pp. 369-383
Author(s):  
Can Huang ◽  
Naubahar Sharif
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Public Research ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights Protection ◽  
Property Rights Protection ◽  
Research Organizations ◽  
Public Research Organizations ◽  
Legislative Changes

This chapter provides background on China’s intellectual property rights (IPR) system. It explains the surge in patenting activity in China over the past two decades. Given the central role played by universities and public research organizations, the chapter details the legislative progress made in management of intellectual property with respect to technology transferred from these two key actors in China’s innovation system. The chapter also outlines the challenges that still remain with regard to management of intellectual property and patent licensing on the part of Chinese universities and public research organizations. Finally, the chapter documents the most recent legislative changes in China’s IPR system in order to strengthen it further.

Legal Nature of Results of Scientific Activities

2019 ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
Dmitry Murzin
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Combined Application ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Protected Object

At present, social development as a whole is determined by the results of research activities. For this reason, it is important to identify the legal nature of the results of scientific activity. The aim of the article is to determine the boundaries of legal regulation of relations on creation and use of the results of scientific activity. The article analyzes the concept «the result of scientific activity» from the points of Russian legislation and civil law doctrine. The author discusses various options for improving legal regulation of civil law relations regarding the results of scientific activities from the standpoint of the correlation of such results with the protected object of intellectual property rights. These options range from expanding the circle of protected objects of intellectual property rights in the framework of the existing system to developing special absolute rights to the results of scientific activity. In some cases, the author refers to historical experience of the Russian law. It is concluded that identification of the legal nature of the results of scientific activity should be carried out with the combined application of all approaches de-scribed.

Indonesian Legal Perspectives on Biotechnology and Intellectual Property Rights

2011 ◽  
pp. 171-183
Author(s):  
Theofransus Litaay ◽  
Dyah Hapsari Prananingrum ◽  
Yakub Adi Krisanto
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Governance Structure ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Research Activities

The authors focus their attention on the structure of Indonesian law and policies on biotechnology issues; they also address some issues related to bioethics and research activities and economic activities, such as the issue of bioprospecting and biopiracy on Indonesian biodiversity, and how the legal and governance structure within Indonesia are designed to cope with this issue. An issue that looms large is about intellectual property rights.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document