In-patient waiting times for patients admitted from the waiting list, public hospitals, Australia, 2008-09

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabián Villena ◽  
Jorge Perez ◽  
René Lagos ◽  
Jocelyn Dunstan

Abstract BackgroundIn Chile, a patient needing a specialty consultation or surgery has to first be referred by a general practitioner, then placed on a waiting list. The Explicit Health Guarantees (GES in Spanish) ensure, by law, the maximum time to solve an important set of health problems. Usually, a health professional manually verifies if each referral, written in natural language, corresponds or not to a GES-covered disease. An error in this classification is catastrophic for patients, as it puts them on a non-prioritized waiting list, characterized by prolonged waiting times. MethodsTo support the manual process, we developed and deployed a system that automatically classifies referrals as GES-covered or not using historical data. Our system is based on word embeddings specially trained for clinical text produced in Chile. We used a vector representation of the reason for referral and patient's age as features for training machine learning models using human-labeled historical data. We constructed a ground truth dataset combining classifications made by three healthcare experts, which was used to validate our results.ResultsThe best performing model over ground truth reached an AUC score of 0.94. During seven months of continuous and voluntary use, the system has amended 87 patient misclassifications.ConclusionThis system is a result of a collaboration between technical and clinical experts, and the design of the classifier was custom-tailored for a hospital's clinical workflow, which encouraged the voluntary use of the platform. Our solution can be easily expanded across other hospitals since the registry is uniform in Chile.


2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 75 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Cromwell ◽  
David A. Griffths

This study investigates how accurately the waiting times of patients about to join a waiting list are predicted by the types of statistics disseminated via web-based waiting time information services. Data were collected at a public hospital in Sydney, Australia, on elective surgery activity and waiting list behaviour from July 1995 to June 1998.The data covered 46 surgeons in 10 surgical specialties. The accuracy of the tested statistics varied greatly, being affected more by the characteristics and behaviour of a surgeon's waiting list than by how the statistics were derived. For those surgeons whose waiting times were often over six months, commonly used statistics can be very poor at forecasting patient waiting times.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Dunstan ◽  
Fabián Villena ◽  
Jorge Pérez ◽  
René Lagos

Abstract Background In Chile, a patient needing a specialty consultation or surgery has to first be referred by a general practitioner, then placed on a waiting list. The Explicit Health Guarantees (GES in Spanish) ensures, by law, the maximum time to solve 85 health problems. Usually, a health professional manually verifies if each referral, written in natural language, corresponds or not to a GES-covered disease. An error in this classification is catastrophic for patients, as it puts them on a non-prioritized waiting list, characterized by prolonged waiting times. Methods To support the manual process, we developed and deployed a system that automatically classifies referrals as GES-covered or not using historical data. Our system is based on word embeddings specially trained for clinical text produced in Chile. We used a vector representation of the reason for referral and patient's age as features for training machine learning models using human-labeled historical data. We constructed a ground truth dataset combining classifications made by three healthcare experts, which was used to validate our results. Results The best performing model over ground truth reached an AUC score of 0.94, with a weighted F1-score of 0.85 (0.87 in precision and 0.86 in recall). During seven months of continuous and voluntary use, the system has amended 87 patient misclassifications. Conclusion This system is a result of a collaboration between technical and clinical experts, and the design of the classifier was custom-tailored for a hospital's clinical workflow, which encouraged the voluntary use of the platform. Our solution can be easily expanded across other hospitals since the registry is uniform in Chile.


2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 1819-1841
Author(s):  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Mahjoub Dridi ◽  
Abdellah El Moudni

This paper addresses an operating room planning problem with surgical demands from both the elective patients and the non-elective ones. A dynamic waiting list is established to prioritize and manage the patients according to their urgency levels and waiting times. In every decision period, sequential decisions are taken by selecting high-priority patients from the waiting list to be scheduled. With consideration of random arrivals of new patients and uncertain surgery durations, the studied problem is formulated as a novel Markov decision process model with dead ends. The objective is to optimize a combinatorial cost function involving patient waiting times and operating room over-utilizations. Considering that the conventional dynamic programming algorithms have difficulties in coping with large-scale problems, we apply several adapted real-time dynamic programming algorithms to solve the proposed model. In numerical experiments, we firstly apply different algorithms to solve the same instance and compare the computational efficiencies. Then, to evaluate the effects of dead ends on the policy and the computation, we conduct simulations for multiple instances with the same problem scale but different dead ends. Experimental results indicate that incorporating dead ends into the model helps to significantly shorten the patient waiting times and improve the computational efficiency.


2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-618
Author(s):  
Markus Torkki ◽  
Miika Linna ◽  
Seppo Seitsalo ◽  
Pekka Paavolainen

Objectives: Potential problems concerning waiting list management are often monitored using mean waiting times based on empirical samples. However, the appropriateness of mean waiting time as an indicator of access can be questioned if a waiting list is not managed well, e.g., if the queue discipline is violated. This study was performed to find out about the queue discipline in waiting lists for elective surgery to reveal potential discrepancies in waiting list management. Methods: There were 1,774 waiting list patients for hallux valgus or varicose vein surgery or sterilization. The waiting time distributions of patients receiving surgery and of patients still waiting for an operation are presented in column charts. The charts are compared with two model charts. One model chart presents a high queue discipline (first in—first out) and another a poor queue discipline (random) queue. Results: There were significant differences in waiting list management across hospitals and patient categories. Examples of a poor queue discipline were found in queues for hallux valgus and varicose vein operations. Conclusions: A routine waiting list reporting should be used to guarantee the quality of waiting list management and to pinpoint potential problems in access. It is important to monitor not only the number of patients in the waiting list but also the queue discipline and the balance between demand and supply of surgical services. The purpose for this type of reporting is to ensure that the priority setting made at health policy level also works in practise.


Author(s):  
Martin Lariviere ◽  
Sarang Deo

First National Healthcare (FNH) runs a large network of hospitals and has worked to systematically reduce waiting times in its emergency departments. One of FNH's regional networks has run a successful marketing campaign promoting its low ED waiting times that other regions want to emulate. The corporate quality manager must now determine whether to allow these campaigns to be rolled out and, if so, which waiting time estimates to use. Are the numbers currently being reported accurate? Is there a more accurate way of estimating patient waiting time that can be easily understood by consumers?


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moustapha Faye ◽  
Niakhaleen Keita ◽  
Ahmed Tall Lemrabott ◽  
Maria Faye ◽  
Bacary Ba ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims The lethality and cost of chronic kidney disease (CKD) management are high in Senegal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the access in dialysis at Senegalese public’s hospitals. Method This was a retrospective cohort during 4 years (2014-2018) from the hemodialysis registry waiting list at Aristide Le Dantec University Hospital. This registry is composed by: a registration form (social survey and doctor's visa); a written letter addressed to hospital director and the national identity card. From this registry, telephone calls were made to collect data relating to mortality and access to dialysis. Results seven hundred fifty-one (751) files were collected. The mean age of the patients was 48.12 ± 15.28 years with a sex ratio of 1.02. The socioeconomic level was low in 85.40% (521/610) and average in 13.61% (83/610). The geographic origin was rural in 11.15%, semi-urban in 07.54% and urban in 81.31%. Ten patients (1.64%) had medical care coverage. On call, 49.70% (373/751) were died before accessing to public dialysis, 29.70% (223/751) had accessed public dialysis and 04.00% (30/751) didn’t yet need dialysis. Hundred twenty-one (16.10%) were unreachable and 0.50% (4/751) was unknown. Conclusion The lethality of CKD was high. Access to dialysis in public hospital remains problematic in Senegal despite its democratization. Additional efforts are needed for effective management of all patients at dialysis stage.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 158-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Fink ◽  
Ashfaq Gilkar ◽  
Phillip Eardley ◽  
Catriona Barron

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document