Pathophysiology and Risk Stratification of Sudden Cardiac Death in Ischemic Heart Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabil El-Sherif ◽  
Mohamed Boutjdir ◽  
Gioia Turitto

Sudden cardiac death accounts for approximately 360,000 annually in the United States and is the cause of half of all cardiovascular deaths. Ischemic heart disease is the major cause of death in the general adult population. Sudden cardiac death can be due to arrhythmic or non-arrhythmic cardiac causes, for example, myocardial rupture. Arrhythmic sudden cardiac death may be caused by ventricular tachyarrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation) or pulseless electrical activity/asystole. The majority of research in risk stratification centers on ventricular tachyarrhythmias simply because of the availability of a successful management strategy, the implantable cardioverter/ defibrillator. Currently the main criterion of primary defibrillator prophylaxis is the presence of organic heart disease and depressed left ventricular systolic function assessed as left ventricular ejection fraction. However, only one third of eligible patients benefit from the implantable defibrillator, resulting in significant redundancy in the use of the device. The cost to the health care system of sustaining this approach is substantial. Further, the current low implantation rate among eligible population probably reflects a perceived low benefit-to-cost ratio of the device. Therefore, attempts to optimize the selection process for primary implantable defibrillator prophylaxis are paramount. The present report will review the most recent pathophysiology and risk stratification strategies for sudden cardiac death beyond the single criterion of depressed ejection fraction. Emphasis will be placed on electrophysiological surrogates of conduction disorder, dispersion of repolarization, and autonomic imbalance, which represent our current understanding of the electrophysiological mechanisms that underlie the initiation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Further, factors that modify arrhythmic death, including noninvasive risk variables, biomarkers, and genomics will be addressed. These factors may have great utility in predicting sudden cardiac arrhythmic death in the general public.

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Issa Pour-Ghaz ◽  
Mark Heckle ◽  
Ikechukwu Ifedili ◽  
Sharif Kayali ◽  
Christopher Nance ◽  
...  

: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is indicated for patients at risk for sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The most commonly used risk stratification algorithms use left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to determine which patients qualify for ICD therapy, even though LVEF is a better marker of total mortality than ventricular tachyarrhythmias mortality. This review evaluates imaging tools and novel biomarkers proposed for better risk stratifying arrhythmic substrate, thereby identifying optimal ICD therapy candidates.


2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (9) ◽  
pp. 42-47
Author(s):  
N B Shlevkov ◽  
A A Zhambeev ◽  
A Z Gasparyan ◽  
V N Shitov ◽  
O V Stukalova

Aim. To identify the features of myocardial scar and fibrosis associated with the occurrence of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs) in high-risk patients with ischemic (ICMP) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP). Materials and methods. This prospective study included 50 patients (41 men, 9 women), age = 60 ± 13 years, 30 patients of them with ICMP and 20 patients with NICMP, who underwent echocardiography (Echo) and contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the heart followed by implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) or resynchronizing devices with defibrillator (CPTD) to prevent sudden cardiac death. Results. Sustained VTs were reported in 20/30 (67%) patients with ICMP and in 5/20 (25%) patients with NICMP on follow-up [26 (22-37) months]. Successive univariate and ROC-analyses of Echo and MRI-indices between patients with and without recurrence of VTs found different results for ICMP and NICMP patients groups. In ICMP patients the VTs were associated with wide transmural fibrosis on contrast MRI that covered 3 or more segments of left ventricular. These segments were preferably localized in the middle parts of the inferior and inferolateral segments of the left ventricle. The independent predictors of VTs in NICMP patients were non-transmural fibrosis at 4.5% of the left ventricular mass by contrast MRI as well as low left ventricular ejection fraction (less than 26%) by Echo. Conclusion. To determine the indications for implantation of the ICD and CRTD for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, it is advisable to take into account not only the value of ejection fraction of left ventricular, but also the features of the fibrosis of the left ventricle by contrast MRI of the heart.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2309-2312
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Dagres ◽  
Gerhard Hindricks

Sudden cardiac death is a major cause of death in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and mostly caused by ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Risk stratification has become of paramount importance especially after the development of implantable cardioverter defibrillators that terminate life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmic episodes very reliably. Numerous attempts have been performed to identify accurate risk stratification tools. Unfortunately, the success of these attempts has been rather limited. A severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction has been convincingly shown to be associated with significantly increased mortality and risk for sudden cardiac death in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. For this reason, it is the main parameter used for risk stratification and for the decision to implant a cardioverter defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. However, left ventricular ejection fraction has several limitations as a stand-alone risk stratifier and has limited sensitivity and specificity. Several other tools have been proposed to improve risk prediction such as the patient’s clinical profile, ventricular ectopy, microvolt T-wave alternans, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, markers of autonomic tone, and also invasive programmed ventricular stimulation. However, none of these techniques has managed to establish itself in clinical practice as a major method for risk stratification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document