scholarly journals Diagnostic efficacy of FNAC by liquid based technique versus conventional smear in lung and mediastinal masses

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2413
Author(s):  
Rekha Singh ◽  
Vani Mittal ◽  
Irbinder Kour Bali ◽  
Sunil Arora ◽  
Raj Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Mediastinal Mass ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Diagnostic Efficacy ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Fine Needle Aspirates ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology

Background: Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) has proven to be less costly and less invasive procedure than biopsy for diagnosing benign and malignant lesions. Of the two methods liquid based cytology (LBC) and conventional cytology (CC), LBC has been standardized as more efficacious in reporting in Gynaecological cases. But, this is still lacking in non-gynaecological cases and many studies are now focusing on studying LBC due to its proven advantages in Pap smear evaluation.Methods: An observational study of 72 patients with lung mass and 11 with mediastinal mass was done for a period of six months in a tertiary care hospital in Gurugram to compare the diagnostic efficacy of LBC and CC in fine needle aspirates from lung/mediastinal mass.Results: Of the 83 cases, reporting of LBC was adequate in 75 cases and CC in only 53 cases. LBC was better when differentiating malignant and benign lesions than CC. CC smears had better cellularity in comparison to LBC smears (36%), but rest cytological features of cytoplasmic detailing, cell architecture, less background debris and blood were all more appreciable in LBC smears than CC preparations.Conclusions: LBC is a better method than conventional smear for smear preparation and processing of aspirates obtained from lung and mediastinal mass.

scholarly journals “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FNAC, USG, US-FNAC, AND HPE IN DIAGNOSIS OF NECK SWELLINGS”

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 9 (upjohns/volume9/Issue2) ◽  
pp. 15-21
Author(s):  
Sachin Jain
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Neck Swelling ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

ABSTRACT Aims: This prospective study was carried out to compare findings of the four procedures namely FNAC (fine-needle aspiration cytology), USG (ultrasonography), US-FNAC (Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology), and HPE (histopathological examination). MATERIAL AND METHODS Total 80 cases of different neck swellings were selected from ENT OPD at tertiary care hospital Prayagraj Uttar Pradesh. All cases underwent the preoperative procedure of FNAC,USG, US-FNAC and postoperative HPE for diagnosing the neck swelling. The results of FNAC, USG, US-FNAC w e r e c o m p a r e d a n d c o r r e l a t e d w i t h histopathology findings and conclusions drawn after statistical analysis. RESULTS More than half (56.25%) of neck swellings were of thyroid swellings. It was observed that sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy of FNAC of all neck swellings were 85.71%, 91.78% ,50%, 98.53% ,91.25% respectively. Sensitivity ,specificity, PPV ,NPV , accuracy of all neck swellings of USG were 71.43%, 98.63%, 83.33% , 97.26% 96.25 respectively. Sensitivity ,specificity, PPV ,NPV , accuracy of all neck swellings of US-FNAC were 85.71% ,97.26% ,75% , 98.61%, 96.25 respectively. CONCLUSION The combined use of USG and FNAC give more accuracy for proper diagnosis of neck swelling than FNAC alone. The most accurate diagnosis of

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document