scholarly journals Inguinal hernia repair in patients with liver cirrhosis: Lichtenstein repair versus laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 2865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mohamed Abdelaziz Hassan ◽  
Mohamed Emad Esmat ◽  
Magdy M. A. Elsebae ◽  
Magid M. Nasr
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Lichtenstein Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scrotal Edema

Background: The optimal surgical approach of inguinal hernia in patients with liver cirrhosis; laparoscopic or open; is still undefined. Whether laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is safe and potentially affords superior outcomes in patients with liver disease is unknown. Aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair compared to open procedures regarding postoperative complications and recurrence rate in patients with liver cirrhosis.Methods: This study involves data of ninety patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia and liver cirrhosis. 48 of them had Lichtenstein repair and 42 patients had laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with the total extra-peritoneal (TEP) approach.Results: The mean operation time was greater for the patients operated by TEP than that by Lichtenstein repair with a statistically significant difference (p=0.02). Wound infection, scrotal edema and hospital stay were greater for the patients operated by Lichtenstein repair (p=0.0001 for all). At a mean follow-up of 16.9 months (range: 2 –32 months); recurrence of hernia developed in 3 (3.1 %) with Lichtenstein repair but no recurrence of hernia occurred in the patients operated with TEP.Conclusions: Elective Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is feasible option in liver cirrhosis patients. However; despite of some better outcomes with TEP; there is insufficient evidence to conclude its greater effectiveness than Lichtenstein repair. 

scholarly journals Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of unilateral inguinal hernia: a comparative study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 921
Author(s):  
Sudarshan P. B. ◽  
Sundaravadanan B. S. ◽  
Kaarthik V. P. ◽  
Prabu Shankar S.
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Unilateral Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Inguinal hernia repair is now one of the most commonly performed general surgical procedures in practice. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was started in year 1999 and since then has gained popularity over the last 2 decades. The introduction of a laparoscopic technique has sparked a debate in the literature over the superiority of this method versus open repair. Even though for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernias, laparoscopic approach is recommended, there is not enough literature to recommend its routine use in unilateral inguinal hernia repair.Methods: A randomised prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital, comparing both Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and lichensteins tension free mesh repair as treatment modalities for unilateral inguinal hernia. Total number of patients in the study group was 60. Patients who were willing for the study were selected for the open or laparoscopic procedure in a randomised way. Open procedure was done by 2 senior surgeons and laparoscopic procedure was performed by 2 other senior surgeons at associate professor designation. Various parameters like the complication rate, post-operative pain, post-operative stay and time to return to work were analysed.Results: Out of the 60 patients, 30 patients underwent open inguinal hernia repair and another 30 patients underwent Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The mean age group was 46.73 in open surgery group and 42.10 in laparoscopic group. 23.3% of the patients in open hernioplasty developed seroma, hematoma in the post-operative period. Whereas 10% had seroma collection in laparoscopic group. No incidence of recurrence in both the groups. No significant difference in pain score between both the groups during immediate post-operative period on POD 0, however there was significant difference in pain score on POD 3 (mean pain in open group 4.13 and lap group 2.87) and POD 7(mean pain in open group 2.90 and lap group 1.23). Mean duration of stay in hospital for open hernioplasty was 7.8 days and for Laparoscopic hernioplasty was 3.07 days. Mean duration of return to work in open hernioplasty was 14.37 days and in laparoscopy group was 9.13 days.Conclusions: There are potential benefits for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair over lichtenstein’s repair for unilateral inguinal hernias in terms of post-operative pain, hospital stay and early return to work.

scholarly journals A new self-made electric hook for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1080
Author(s):  
Hongfu Lin ◽  
Yu Zhao ◽  
KunSong Wang ◽  
Caixing Huang ◽  
Zihua Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Clinical Application ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Indirect Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia

Background: Current investigation was conducted to explore the clinical application of self-made electric hook in laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair.Methods: Randomized controlled trial was conducted that compared two groups of patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair from 2013 to 2017 at our institution. A laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair with beak-like electrocoagulation instrument as modified trans-abdominal preperitoneal prosthesis was performed on 42 patients. As a comparison, 40 patients with traditional TAPP were collected and analyzed. In the end, we compared the operation time, blood loss, complications, and recurrence of two groups.Results: 82 patients have successfully completed surgery without conversion to open inguinal hernia repair. Patients were follow-up visited for 18 to 78 months, and no recurrence was found. 1 case of scrotal edema occurred using a self-made electric hook in modified TAPP, and cured by conservative treatment. In traditional TAPP group, there was 1 case of postoperative seroma, which cured by conservative treatment. There was no significant difference between these 2 groups in terms of complications and recurrence (p>0. 05). However, the differences in operation time and blood loss were significant (p<0. 05).Conclusions: Self-made electrical hook showed in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair of indirect inguinal hernia has the advantages of shortening operation time, reducing bleeding, easing the difficulty of operation, and improving the safety of surgery, it is worthy of further clinical application.

Airway management with I-gelTM for ambulatory laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children; a retrospective review of 230 cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Hipólito ◽  
Vicente Vieira ◽  
Virginia Antunes ◽  
Petra Alves ◽  
Adriana Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Neuromuscular Blockade ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Mean

Background: Inguinal hernia is one of the most common conditions presented for surgical repair in children and laparoscopic approaches are increasingly performed. Previous studies have shown safety and efficacy in the use of supraglottic devices (SGD) as an alternative to tracheal intubation, which fits particularly well with outpatient anesthesia. Methodology: we conduct a retrospective observational study, collecting data from the electronic anesthetic form, from all patients aged 0 to 17 y who underwent ambulatory laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing between February 2015 and August 2019, if I-gelTM was used to airway management. Results: We found 230 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 5.2 y old, mean weight 20.1 kg. All patients were ASA I (n=203) or ASA II (n=27). The mean surgery duration was 38 minutes. We found 4 respiratory adverse events, three bronchospasms, and one laryngospasm, managed in the operating room. Ninety percent of the surgeries were performed without neuromuscular blockade. Conclusion: I-gelTM was a safe, effective, and convenient alternative to airway management to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the ambulatory setting. According to available literature, our practice did not represent an increased risk for the studied respiratory events. SGD obviates the need for neuromuscular blockade. Key words: I-gel; Supraglottic devices; Laparoscopy; Inguinal hernia repair; Pediatrics; Anesthesia, ambulatory Citation: Hipólito C, Vieira V, Antunes V, Alves P, Rodrigues A, Santos MJ. Airway management with I-gelTM for ambulatory laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children; a retrospective review of 230 cases. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2020;24(5): Received: 18 February 2020, Reviewed: 5 August, 6 September 2020, Accepted: 11 September 2020

Assessment of Intra-Operative Difficulties and Early Post-Operative Complications in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair using Conventional Polypropylene Mesh Versus 3D Mesh

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazem AbdelSalam Mohamed ◽  
Karim Fahmy ◽  
Mohammad Ahmad Abd-erRazik ◽  
Shaimaa Atef Ismaeil Awwad Elkomy
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Fixation Time ◽  
3D Mesh ◽  
Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Operative Complications

Abstract Background The fundamental mechanism of abdominal wall hernia formation is the loss of structural integrity at the musculotendinous layer. The exact cause of inguinal hernia is still unknown but the factors contributing in its occurrence include; preformed congenital sac, chronic passive rise in the intra-abdominal pressure and weak abdominal wall. Aim of the Work To assess intra-operative difficulties of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using two different meshes: The conventional polyproline mesh and the three-dimensional (3D) mesh, as regard the operative time. And early post-operative complications including post-operative seroma, early postoperative pain, chronic pain and limitation of function. Patients and Methods In our study 30 patients were recruited according to our preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were divided randomly into two groups, a group in which the 3D mesh was used and a group in which the polypropylene mesh was used. The study was conducted in Ain Shams University hospitals for 6 months, in which patients where followed up from 3 to 6 months and compared in terms of intraoperative time, post-operative pain after one week, restriction of physical activity, seroma formation and presence of chronic pain. Results In our study the mean application time (minutes) in 3D group was found to be 7.07 ± 2.66 while in PP group it was found to be 12.53±3.66 with highly statistically significant difference between them at p &lt; 0.001. We believe that this difference in fixation time in our present study is attributed to easy insertion through the port, easy intraoperative handling, and easy unfolding of 3D mesh. Conclusion The use of three-dimensional mesh (3D mesh) for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is a safe and viable option. It offers many advantages in terms of less fixation time, shorter hospital stays, early recovery with a better movement limitation score. Whereas chronic pain was found to be similar in both groups. Further, elimination of tacks for fixation and shorter hospital stay may reduce the cost of 3D mesh. Longer-term studies are recommended with a larger sample size and follow up duration for better assessment of chronic pain, also for following up on recurrence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document