scholarly journals Delays in Presentation by Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Author(s):  
Suhaib Almashari ◽  
Yasir Al-Malki ◽  
Adil Al-Riyami ◽  
Sunil K. Nadar

Objectives: To assess causes of delay for presentation with ST elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) at our institution. Methods: We included patients with a STEMI that were taken up for primary angioplasty, who had presented from Jan 2017 to December 2019 to the emergency department at Sultan Qaboos university hospital, Muscat. Results:  101 patients (Mean age 54.8+10.8 years; 80 (79.2%) male) were included. The median (IQR) pain to door time was 60 (30-120) minutes.  66 (66%) patients arrived within 90 minutes. All except one arrived by privately arranged transport. Feeling that the pain was not important (60%) or not cardiac (22%) were the main reasons for delay. Being diabetic was the only patient factor that predicted delay. Conclusion: A high proportion of patients presenting to our institution with a STEMI arrived within recommended times. However more public education is required to improve awareness about the importance of early evaluation of chest pain. Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; prehospital delay.

Author(s):  
Suhaib Almashari ◽  
Yasir Al-Malki ◽  
Adil Al-Riyami ◽  
Sunil K Nadar

Objectives: To assess causes of delay for presentation with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at our institution. Methods: We included patients with a STEMI that were taken up for primary angioplasty, who had presented from Jan 2017 to December 2019 to the emergency department at Sultan Qaboos university hospital, Muscat. Results: 101 patients (Mean age 54.8+10.8 years; 80 (79.2%) male) were included. The median (IQR) pain to door time was 60 (30-120) minutes.  66 (66%) patients arrived within 90 minutes. All except one arrived by privately arranged transport. Feeling that the pain was not important (60%) or not cardiac (22%) were the main reasons for delay. Being diabetic was the only patient factor that predicted delay. Conclusion: A high proportion of patients presenting to our institution with a STEMI arrived within recommended times. However more public education is required to improve awareness about the importance of early evaluation of chest pain. Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; prehospital delay


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Garcia-Garcia ◽  
F Rueda ◽  
J Vila ◽  
O De Diego ◽  
T Oliveras ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cardiogenic shock (CS) is an ominous complication of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the widespread use of reperfusion therapies and invasive management could have reduced the prevalence of CS and improved the prognosis of these patients in the last decades. Purpose The aim is to analyze the changes over last three decades in the prevalence, management and acute phase prognosis and 1-year mortality of STEMI patients complicated with CS. Method Between February 1989 and December 2017, 7,589 STEMI patients were consecutively admitted in the Coronary Care Unit of a University Hospital and were included in a prospective registry. Depending on the year of admission, patients were classified in five groups: 1989–1994: n=1,337, period 1; 1995–1999: n=960, period 2; 2000–2004: n=1,059, period 3; 2005–2009: n=1,535, period 4 and 2010–2015: n=2,698, period 5). We analyze the trend in prevalence of CS, management and 28-day and 1-year mortality over these five periods. Results The global prevalence of CS was 6.1% (466 patients), mean age was 67.7 (SD 11.7) years and 68.7% were men. Prevalence of CS in STEMI decreased from period 1 to 5 (7.3%, 6.4%, 5.5%, 5.8%, 6.0%, p<0.001), although it has been reduced more in women (10.1% in period 1 vs 8.3%, period 5, p<0.001) than in men (6.5% vs 5.4%, period 1 vs 5, respectively (p<0.001). Reperfusion therapy increased from 25.8% in period 1 (all with thrombolysis) vs 83.8% in period 5 (all with primary angioplasty). Intra-aortic balloon contrapulsation was only available from period 3 to 5, and it's used were firstly increased (20.7%, 36% and 37.9%, respectively, p<0.001). Ventricular assistance device (Impella CP) it was only available in 2017 and it was implanted in 10.5% of CS due to STEMI. Although 28-day case fatality is very high (60.7%, 283 patients), it has been reduced from period 1 to 5 (69.6%, 77.3%, 64.7%, 55.9% and 57.8%, respectively, p=0.012). This reduction in 28-day case fatality was higher in women (75.5% in period 1 vs 58.6% in period 5, p=0.12) than in men (66.8% vs 57.3, period 1–5, p=0.019). One-year mortality has been reduced between periods 1–5 (73.7% vs 61.8%, p=0.012). After multivariate adjustment, both 28-day (HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45–0.89, p=0.008) and 1-year mortality (HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45–0.90, p=0.010) have declined in the last period. Kaplan-Meier curves, 1-year mortality Conclusions Cardiogenic shock development in STEMI patients has been reduced from 7.3% to 6.1% in the last three decades. The whole improvement in management of these patients achieves a 37% of reduction in 28-day case fatality and 1-year all-cause mortality. Despite this improvement, acute phase (28-day) case fatality of STEMI complicated with CS remains over 57% in the primary angioplasty era.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Fu ◽  
C.X Song ◽  
X.D Li ◽  
Y.J Yang

Abstract Background The benefit of statins in secondary prevention of patients stabilized after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been well established. However, the benefit of preloading statins, i.e. high-intensity statins prior to reperfusion therapy remains unclear. Most previous studies included all types of ACS patients, and subgroup analysis indicated the benefit of preloading statins was only seen in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the sample size of subgroup population was relatively small and such benefit requires further validation. Objective To investigate the effect of loading dose of statins before primary reperfusion on 30-mortality in patients with STEMI. Methods We enrolled patients in China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) registry from January 2013 to September 2014. CAMI registry was a prospective multicenter registry of patients with acute acute myocardial infarction in China. Patients were divided into two groups according to statins usage: preloading group and control group. Patients in preloading group received loading does of statins before primary reperfusion and during hospitalization. Patients in control group did not receive statins during hospitalization or at discharge. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Baseline characteristics, angiographic characteristics and outcome were compared between groups. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to mitigate baseline differences between groups and examine the association between preloading statins on in-hospital mortality risk. The following variables were used to establish PS matching score: age, sex, classification of hospitals, clinical presentation (heart failure at presentation, cardiac shock, cardiac arrest, Killip classification), hypertension, diabetes, prior angina, prior myocardial infarction history, prior stroke, initial treatment. Results A total of 1169 patients were enrolled in control group and 6795 in preloading group. A total of 833 patients (334 in control group and 499 in preloading group) died during hospitalization. Compared with control group, preloading group were younger, more likely to be male and present with Killip I classification. The proportion of hypertension and diabetes were higher in preloading group. After PS matching, all the variables used to generate PS score were well balanced. In the PS-matched cohort, 30-day mortality risk was 26.3% (292/1112) in the control group and 11.9% (132/1112) in the preloading group (p&lt;0.0001). Conclusions The current study found preloading statins treatment prior to reperfusion therapy reduced in-hospital mortality risk in a large-scale contemporary cohort of patients with STEMI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document