First application of SanMcs technology to marine seismics

Author(s):  
Ekaterina E. Khogoeva ◽  
◽  
Evgeny A. Khogoev ◽  
Jostein K. Kjerstad ◽  
Børge O. Rosland ◽  
...  

The article presents the results of first application of microsesismic spectral analysis developed to land seismics to marine seismic data. Principal difference in algorithmical and methodological aspects are described. Agreement between the anomalies on microseismic spectrum in the range of 4–8 and 12–16 Hz and known hydrocarbon depositions is shown.

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Grachev ◽  
A. Starovoitov ◽  
R. Repin

The article presents the results of applying the technology of spectral analysis of microseisms to marine seismic data. The fundamental differences between the software-algorithmic and methodological aspects of the processing of marine and land seismic data are described. Correlation of microseismic spectrum anomalies in the range of 4–8 and 10–15 Hz with a known oil accumulation is shown; the correspondence of another 10–15 Hz spectrum anomaly with gas condensate accumulation was also found. The conclusion about the seismic emission nature of microseism anomalies has been substantiated. The development process of seismic emission in time is considered. It was found that for each local emission zone, the beginning of the process development may have its own time. The duration of the maximum emission level phase is from 0.5 to 0.75 s. The stability of processing results is shown; local anomalies of the microseismic spectrum are traced on several parallel receivers lines that are 100 m apart from each other.


2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 106-121
Author(s):  
A. O. Verpahovskaya ◽  
V. N. Pilipenko ◽  
Е. V. Pylypenko

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lourenildo W.B. Leite ◽  
J. Mann ◽  
Wildney W.S. Vieira

ABSTRACT. The present case study results from a consistent processing and imaging of marine seismic data from a set collected over sedimentary basins of the East Brazilian Atlantic. Our general aim is... RESUMO. O presente artigo resulta de um processamento e imageamento consistentes de dados sísmicos marinhos de levantamento realizado em bacias sedimentares do Atlântico do Nordeste...


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian W.D. Dalziel ◽  
◽  
Robert Smalley ◽  
Lawrence A. Lawver ◽  
Demian Gomez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 4874
Author(s):  
Milan Brankovic ◽  
Eduardo Gildin ◽  
Richard L. Gibson ◽  
Mark E. Everett

Seismic data provides integral information in geophysical exploration, for locating hydrocarbon rich areas as well as for fracture monitoring during well stimulation. Because of its high frequency acquisition rate and dense spatial sampling, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) has seen increasing application in microseimic monitoring. Given large volumes of data to be analyzed in real-time and impractical memory and storage requirements, fast compression and accurate interpretation methods are necessary for real-time monitoring campaigns using DAS. In response to the developments in data acquisition, we have created shifted-matrix decomposition (SMD) to compress seismic data by storing it into pairs of singular vectors coupled with shift vectors. This is achieved by shifting the columns of a matrix of seismic data before applying singular value decomposition (SVD) to it to extract a pair of singular vectors. The purpose of SMD is data denoising as well as compression, as reconstructing seismic data from its compressed form creates a denoised version of the original data. By analyzing the data in its compressed form, we can also run signal detection and velocity estimation analysis. Therefore, the developed algorithm can simultaneously compress and denoise seismic data while also analyzing compressed data to estimate signal presence and wave velocities. To show its efficiency, we compare SMD to local SVD and structure-oriented SVD, which are similar SVD-based methods used only for denoising seismic data. While the development of SMD is motivated by the increasing use of DAS, SMD can be applied to any seismic data obtained from a large number of receivers. For example, here we present initial applications of SMD to readily available marine seismic data.


Geophysics ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 854-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Larner ◽  
Ron Chambers ◽  
Mai Yang ◽  
Walt Lynn ◽  
Willon Wai

Despite significant advances in marine streamer design, seismic data are often plagued by coherent noise having approximately linear moveout across stacked sections. With an understanding of the characteristics that distinguish such noise from signal, we can decide which noise‐suppression techniques to use and at what stages to apply them in acquisition and processing. Three general mechanisms that might produce such noise patterns on stacked sections are examined: direct and trapped waves that propagate outward from the seismic source, cable motion caused by the tugging action of the boat and tail buoy, and scattered energy from irregularities in the water bottom and sub‐bottom. Depending upon the mechanism, entirely different noise patterns can be observed on shot profiles and common‐midpoint (CMP) gathers; these patterns can be diagnostic of the dominant mechanism in a given set of data. Field data from Canada and Alaska suggest that the dominant noise is from waves scattered within the shallow sub‐buttom. This type of noise, while not obvious on the shot records, is actually enhanced by CMP stacking. Moreover, this noise is not confined to marine data; it can be as strong as surface wave noise on stacked land seismic data as well. Of the many processing tools available, moveout filtering is best for suppressing the noise while preserving signal. Since the scattered noise does not exhibit a linear moveout pattern on CMP‐sorted gathers, moveout filtering must be applied either to traces within shot records and common‐receiver gathers or to stacked traces. Our data example demonstrates that although it is more costly, moveout filtering of the unstacked data is particularly effective because it conditions the data for the critical data‐dependent processing steps of predictive deconvolution and velocity analysis.


1985 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 1152-1152
Author(s):  
Helge Brandsaeter ◽  
Olav Eimstad

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document