scholarly journals Social cost benefit analysis of tobacco control policies in the Netherlands

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reina de Kinderen ◽  
Tim Rombouts
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
R J A de Kinderen ◽  
B F M Wijnen ◽  
S M A A Evers ◽  
M Hiligsmann ◽  
A T G Paulus ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In the Netherlands approximately 23% of the population of 15 years and older smokes. The main research questions were to identify what social costs- and benefits can be expected when various tobacco control policies would be implemented in The Netherlands, how do costs and benefits change over time, and which sectors in society could expect to incur costs and in which sectors accrue profits. Methods A SCBA was conducted using a combination of the Chronic Disease Model developed by the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), the SimSmoke model and a specially designed excel model. Policies included both tax increases (i.e. increase of excise tax on tobacco of 5% or 10% each year) and a policy package as proposed by the World Health Organization (i.e. including mass media campaigns and mediabans). Results When no new policy measures are implemented, the prevalence of smoking will decrease by 2.3 percentage points over the next 35 years. The policies reviewed in this report have the potential to decrease smoking prevalence by 14.2 percentage points (and in a ‘smoking-free society scenario, by as much as 17.4 percentage points). Furthermore, the results show that the intervention costs for all scenarios are minimal, and that investing in health is beneficial as seen from both the public health and fiscal perspective. Conclusions This study demonstrated that reducing the prevalence of smoking has beneficial effects for various stakeholders within the Dutch society: such as employers (e.g. increased productivity) and consumers (e.g. increase quality of life).


2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 245-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. RAM BABU ◽  
NALLATHIGA RAMAKRISHNA

Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) has been serving as an important tool for decision making with regard to the development projects involving large investments. The Social Cost-Benefit Analysis (SCBA) is an extension of the CBA to certain social impacts, which hitherto were not measured. As the impacts of development projects on ecology and environment assumed importance, measuring the corresponding costs and benefits also began to assume significance. With the advancement in economic valuation techniques over time, measurement could be done and the framework of SCBA has been extended to incorporate the same. Moreover, unlike the CBAs, which do not account for the distributional aspects, the SCBA can potentially account for these. This paper presents a case study of extending the SCBA framework to include social and environmental impacts of a large water resource development project in India. It emphasises the distribution of project benefits and costs over stakeholders, spatial locations and time horizons so as to demonstrate the utility of extended SCBA in project decision making. It is observed that both the numeraire measure i.e. cost-benefit ratio, as well as the distributional analysis present a favourable case for the project.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document