Acetabular Posterior Wall Fracture: How to Determine the Fragment Size

Posterior wall fracture is one of the most common fracture types of the acetabulum and a conventional approach is to perform open reduction and internal fixation with a plate and screws. Percutaneous screw fixations, on the other hand, have recently gained attention due to their benefits such as less exposure and minimization of blood loss. However their biomechanical stability, especially in terms interfragmentary movement, has not been investigated thoroughly. The aims of this study are twofold: (1) to measure the interfragmentary movements in the conventional open approach with plate fixations and the percutaneous screw fixations in the acetabular fractures and compare them; and (2) to develop and validate a fast and efficient way of predicting the interfragmentary movement in percutaneous fixation of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum using a 3D finite element (FE) model of the pelvis. Our results indicate that in single fragment fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum, plate fixations give superior stability to screw fixations. However screw fixations also give reasonable stability as the average gap between fragment and the bone remained less than 1 mm when the maximum load was applied. Our finite element model predicted the stability of screw fixation with good accuracy. Moreover, when the screw positions were optimized, the stability predicted by our FE model was comparable to the stability obtained by plate fixations. Our study has shown that FE modeling can be useful in examining biomechanical stability of osteosynthesis and can potentially be used in surgical planning of osteosynthesis.

Download Full-text

Retrospective Comparative Study of Different Treatment Outcome of Acetabular Posterior Wall Fracture in a Developing Country

West Indian Medical Journal ◽

10.7727/wimj.2015.520 ◽

2016 ◽

Author(s):

S Branislav ◽

V Cedomir ◽

S Ana ◽

R Zoran ◽

R Vidosava ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Treatment Outcome ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Developing Country ◽

Posterior Wall ◽

Posterior Wall Fracture ◽

Retrospective Comparative Study

Download Full-text

Modified Kocher-Langenbeck Approach for the Treatment of Posterior Wall or Column Acetabular Fractures: The One-Incision Two-Window Method

10.21203/rs.3.rs-58691/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Tien-Yu Yang ◽

Po-Yao Chuang ◽

Tsan-Wen Huang ◽

Kuo-Chin Huang

Keyword(s):

Posterior Wall ◽

Acetabular Fractures ◽

Fracture Group ◽

Satisfaction Rate ◽

Posterior Wall Fracture ◽

The Mean ◽

Group 2 ◽

The One ◽

Group 1

Abstract Background: The Kocher-Langenbeck (K-L) approach is the standard method for the treatment of posterior wall or column acetabular fractures. This approach allows direct access to the posterior structures of the acetabulum, but is limited cranially and caudally by the neurovascular bundle. The present study was conducted to assess the quality of reduction and the incidence of complications in patients who underwent the modified “one-incision two-window” K-L approach.Methods : This is a Retrospective case series with recruited thirteen consecutive patients from 2015 to 2017 who sustained an acute, displaced posterior wall or column acetabular fracture. All patients were treated with modified “one-incision two-window” K-L approach.Results: The mean operation time, mean intraoperative blood loss, and mean incision wound length were estimated to be 103.8 min (60-120 min), 373.1 mL (100-700 mL), and 9.7 cm (8.0-13.0 cm), respectively. The radiographic quality of reduction was graded as anatomical reduction (maximum residual displacement [MRD] ≤ 2 mm) in all cases, according to Matta’s criteria. Concerning the incidence of complications, there were no iatrogenic neurovascular injury, no surgical site infections, and no osteonecrosis of the femoral head or heterotopic ossification in this cohort. One patient with transverse posterior wall fracture (group 1) experienced deep vein thrombosis in the lesion leg. Another two patients with solitary posterior wall fracture (group 2) developed posttraumatic osteoarthritis, with one diagnosed as Tonnis grade I lesion and the other as Tonnis grade III lesion. With respect to the clinical treatment outcome, the mean visual analogue scale (VAS), mean modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and subjective satisfaction rate were 1.7 (1.0-2.0), 90.6 (81-100), and 84.6% (80%-90%), respectively. Although there was no significant difference in the satisfaction rate (82.9% vs. 87.0%, P = 0.941) at 12 months after surgery, group 1 patients had more increased VAS score (2.0 vs. 1.2, P = 0.016) and more decreased mHHS (87.7 vs. 94.6, P = 0.014) than group 2 patients. Conclusions: Our pilot study confirmed that the “one-incision two-window” K-L approach is a simple, safe, reliable, and effective way to manage acute, displaced posterior wall or column acetabular fractures.Level of evidence: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Download Full-text