scholarly journals A Comparative Study between Conventional Dose of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Alone & a Combination of lower Fose of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Fentanyl for Subarachnoid Block in Turp Surgery among Elederly

Author(s):  
Dr Brejesh Ravi Varma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Gunjan Regmi ◽  
Rejina Shahi ◽  
Kanak Khanal ◽  
Kumud Pyakurel ◽  
Chetan Bohora ◽  
...  

Introduction: Subarachnoid block is commonly employed technique for lower abdominal and lower limb procedures. Bupivacaine and ropivacaine are commonly used local anesthetics for subarachnoid block. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of isobaric Ropivacaine over hyperbaric Bupivacaine. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study for a duration of six months. 60 ASA grade I-II adult patients between 16-60 years undergoing lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomized into two groups. Group I including patients who received 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and group II including patients who received 22.5 mg of isobaric ropivacaine 0.75%. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block and hemodynamics including heart rate (HR), non invasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and respiratory depression were recorded. Data were entered in Microsoft excel and statistical analysis was done by chi square test and T test using SPSS (version 23.0). Results: Both the groups were demographically statistically insignificant. Successful block was attained in all patients in both groups. The sensory onset and motor onset were significantly delayed in the Ropivacaine Group compared to the Bupivacaine Group P<0.001. There was no significant difference in the hemodynamics (heart rate and mean arterial pressure ). Conclusions: Though isobaric ropivacaine provided lesser degree of sensory and motor block with delayed onset compared to hyperbaric bupivacaine, it can effectively and safely used in subarachnoid block in lower limb surgeries without any major hemodynamic changes and adverse effects.


Author(s):  
Kumkum Gupta ◽  
Swati Sharma ◽  
Prashant K. Gupta ◽  
Guljeet Kaur ◽  
Vasundra Tyagi ◽  
...  

Background: Neuraxial techniques possess many benefits for elective abdominal hysterectomy due to profound surgical anesthesia and muscle relaxation. The present study was aimed to compare the clinical benefits of pre-emptive oral clonidine with oral tramadol for abdominal hysterectomy conducted under subarachnoid block with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.Methods: Sixty adult female patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, aged 42 to 65 years, were randomized into two groups of 30 patients each to receive either oral clonidine, 100 µg (Group C) or oral tramadol 50 mg tramadol (Group T), 90 min before initiation of subarachnoid block with 3.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Intraoperative hemodynamic changes, duration of analgesia and incidence of shivering were recorded as primary end points. Drug related effects of pruritus, sedation, nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression were recorded as secondary outcomes.Results: The onset of sensory and motor block was comparable between the groups but the time to two dermatome regression were prolonged in patients of Group C with statistical significant difference (p=0.05). Duration of analgesia was also enhanced in patients of Group C (268.27±12.18 min versus 223.15±14.31 min in Group T) with statistically highly significant difference (p=0.000). The incidence of shivering was lower in the patients of clonidine group. The heart rate was lower in patients of clonidine throughout intraoperative period and no incidence of bradycardia, hypotension or sedation occurred in any patient.Conclusions: Both drugs showed clinical benefits as pre-emptive oral medication for abdominal hysterectomy conducted under subarachnoid block but oral clonidine (100 µg) proved to be more beneficial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document