scholarly journals Role of Fibular Osteotomy in Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the Knee Joint

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr Shahnawaz Ali ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Abhishek Chaturvedi ◽  
Amar Kamat ◽  
Abhishek Shinde ◽  
Abhishek Kulkarni ◽  
Vishwas Gawte

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of proximal fibular osteotomy and Arthroscopic debridement for pain relief and improvement of medial joint space and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2019, 22 patients who underwent proximal fibular osteotomy and arthroscopic debridement for medial compartment osteoarthritis were retrospectively followed up. To analyse the alignment of the lower extremity and ratio of the knee joint space (medial/lateral compartment preoperative and postoperative weight-bearing and whole lower extremity radiographs were obtained. Preoperatively and postoperatively at 6wks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 yr using a visual analogue scale,knee pain was assessed and knee ambulation activities were evaluated using the American Knee Society score RESULTS: Medial pain relief was observed in 20/22 patients after this procedure. Most patients exhibited improved walking postoperatively. An average increase in the postoperative medial knee joint space was seen in weight-bearing lower extremity radiographs. Additionally, obvious correction of alignment was observed in the whole lower extremity radiographs in 2 of 22 patients. But 25 % of patients had common peroneal nerve neuro-praxia which got improved over the period of average 6 months.
 CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that proximal fibular osteotomy and arthroscopic debridement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis effectively relieves pain and improves joint function at a mean of 15 months postoperative.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. e1-e12
Author(s):  
Ashok Kumar ◽  
Anikait Ghosh Kadamb ◽  
Krish Ghosh Kadamb

BackgroundComparative studies of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid show variable results. PurposeA review was conducted to understand the current role of PRP and its efficacy versus hyaluronic acid in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint. MethodsOut of 170 identified studies, 14 studies involving 1575 patients with 637 males and 938 females were selected based on PRISMA flow chart guidelines and were analyzed for the study. ResultsA standard PRP regimen consisting of 2–3 intra-articular injections (IA) of 4–6 mL of leucocyte poor PRP at 1–2 weekly intervals provides a better result than HA during the first 3–6 months, and which may continue up to one year. PRP and HA may have synergistic effect; pain and swelling are the two most com-mon complications with PRP, the incidence is more with leucocyte rich PRP (LP-PRP) and intra-osseous PRP treatment.ConclusionPRP provides hope and is more effective than hyaluronic acid in pain relief and improving the quality of life in mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee joint. However, hype, that is effective in all, irrespective of grades of OA, mal-aligned or stiff knee, ligamentous laxity, and can avoid joint replacement is a big hindrance in establishing it as a preferred treatment in OA knee. The author follows the above-mentioned PRP regimen; and recommends to combine leucocyte poor PRP with HA for IA injections & with LP-PRP injections along with the two most common painful points (medial collateral ligament, pesanisernius) in a highly painful OA knee. PRP may not address extra-articular causes of knee pain (mal-alignment, muscle wasting, tendinosis), should be corrected for optimum outcome. Contact sports, running, exercises putting pressure on knee and NSAID should be avoided during PRP treatment. Also, more randomized controlled trials are required to further standardize the PRP preparation, administration, injection interval & proper documentation of efficacy and complications in the regenerative registry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document