scholarly journals Personalized comprehensive molecular profiling of high risk osteosarcoma: Implications and limitations for precision medicine

Oncotarget ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (38) ◽  
pp. 40642-40654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Michael J. Wagner ◽  
Mary F. McGuire ◽  
Nawid M. Sarwari ◽  
Eswaran Devarajan ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila D.M. Campos ◽  
Joshua M. Jackson ◽  
Małgorzata A. Witek ◽  
Steven A. Soper

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Vetsch ◽  
Claire E. Wakefield ◽  
Emily Duve ◽  
Brittany C. McGill ◽  
Meera Warby ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Children with high-risk cancers have low survival rates because current treatment options are limited. Precision medicine trials are designed to offer patients individualized treatment recommendations, potentially improving their clinical outcomes. However, parents’ understanding is often limited, and expectations of benefit to their own child can be high. Health care professionals (HCPs) are often not familiar with precision medicine and might find managing families’ expectations challenging. Scientists find themselves working with high expectations among different stakeholders to rapidly translate their identification of actionable targets in real time. Therefore, we wanted to gain an in-depth understanding of the experiences of all stakeholders involved in a new precision medicine pilot trial called TARGET, including parents, their child’s HCPs, and the scientists who conducted the laboratory research and generated the data used to make treatment recommendations. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with all participants and analyzed the interviews thematically. RESULTS We interviewed 15 parents (9 mothers; 66.7% bereaved), 17 HCPs, and 16 scientists. We identified the following themes in parents’ interviews: minimal understanding and need for more information, hope as a driver of participation, challenges around biopsies, timing, and drug access, and few regrets. HCP and scientist interviews revealed themes such as embracing new technologies and collaborations and challenges managing families’ expectations, timing of testing and test results, and drug access. CONCLUSION Educating families, HCPs, and scientists to better understand the benefits and limitations of precision medicine trials may improve the transparency of the translation of discovery genomics to novel therapies, increase satisfaction with the child’s care, and ameliorate the additional long-term psychosocial burden for families already affected by high-risk childhood cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii118-ii118
Author(s):  
Maria Tsoli ◽  
Loretta Lau ◽  
Paulette Barahona ◽  
Chelsea Mayoh ◽  
Tim Failes ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 471 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tariq Al-Zaid ◽  
Wei-Lien Wang ◽  
Neeta Somaiah ◽  
Alexander J. Lazar

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily V. Mould ◽  
Loretta Lau ◽  
Greg Arndt ◽  
Paulette Barahona ◽  
Mark J. Cowley ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Perez ◽  
Robert A. Bonomo

ABSTRACT Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) using MinION was used to characterize high-risk clones of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae harboring blaNDM-5, blaOXA-181, and blaCTX-M-15, as well as Pseudomonas aeruginosa harboring blaNDM, in a patient who received health care in India. Synergy testing demonstrated the activity of aztreonam and ceftazime-avibactam in combination. This case illustrates a “precision medicine” approach where deeper understanding of the genotype through WGS and of the phenotype through synergy testing formed the basis for rational combination therapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou ◽  
David S. Hong ◽  
Jennifer J. Wheler ◽  
Gerald S. Falchook ◽  
Filip Janku ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In 2007, we initiated IMPACT, a precision medicine program for patients referred for participation in early-phase clinical trials. We assessed the correlation of factors, including genomically matched therapy, with overall survival (OS). Patients and methods We performed molecular profiling (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments) (genes ≤ 182) for patients with lethal/refractory advanced cancers referred to the Phase 1 Clinical Trials Program. Matched therapy, if available, was selected on the basis of genomics. Clinical trials varied over time and included investigational drugs against various targets (single agents or combinations). Patients were followed up for up to 10 years. Results Of 3487 patients who underwent tumor molecular profiling, 1307 (37.5%) had ≥ 1 alteration and received therapy (matched, 711; unmatched, 596; median age, 57 years; 39% men). Most common tumors were gastrointestinal, gynecologic, breast, melanoma, and lung. Objective response rates were: matched 16.4%, unmatched 5.4% (p < .0001); objective response plus stable disease ≥ 6 months rates were: matched 35.3% and unmatched 20.3%, (p < .001). Respective median progression-free survival: 4.0 and 2.8 months (p < .0001); OS, 9.3 and 7.3 months; 3-year, 15% versus 7%; 10-year, 6% vs. 1% (p < .0001). Independent factors associated with shorter OS (multivariate analysis) were performance status > 1 (p < .001), liver metastases (p < .001), lactate dehydrogenase levels > upper limit of normal (p < .001), PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway alterations (p < .001), and non-matched therapy (p < .001). The five independent factors predicting shorter OS were used to design a prognostic score. Conclusions Matched targeted therapy was an independent factor predicting longer OS. A score to predict an individual patient’s risk of death is proposed. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00851032, date of registration February 25, 2009.


Author(s):  
Iacopo Sardi ◽  
Veronica Tintori ◽  
Cinzia Marchi ◽  
Marinella Veltroni ◽  
A. Lippi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Edmondson ◽  
E.J. Crosbie ◽  
M. Nickkho-Amiry ◽  
A. Kaufmann ◽  
E. Stelloo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document