scholarly journals Healthy Birth Practice #5: Avoid Giving Birth on Your Back and Follow Your Body’s Urge to Push

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce T. DiFranco ◽  
Marilyn Curl
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Supine Position ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Birth Experience ◽  
Normal Birth ◽  
Care Practices

Women in the United States are still giving birth in the supine position and are restricted in how long they can push and encouraged to push forcefully by their caregivers. Research does not support these activities. There is discussion about current research and suggestions on how to improve the quality of the birth experience. This article is an updated evidence-based review of the “Lamaze International Care Practices That Promote Normal Birth, Care Practice #5: Spontaneous Pushing in Upright or Gravity-Neutral Positions,” published in The Journal of Perinatal Education, 16(3), 2007.

scholarly journals Healthy Birth Practice #1: Let Labor Begin on Its Own

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 178-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debby Amis
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Labor Induction ◽  
Professional Organizations ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Normal Birth ◽  
Care Practices

As cesarean rates have climbed to almost one-third of all births in the United States, current research and professional organizations have identified letting labor begin on its own as one of the most important strategies for reducing the primary cesarean rate. At least equally important, letting labor begin on its own supports normal physiology, prevents iatrogenic prematurity, and prevents the cascade of interventions caused by labor induction. This article is an updated evidence-based review of the “Lamaze International Care Practices That Promote Normal Birth, Care Practice #1: Let Labor Begin on Its Own,” published in The Journal of Perinatal Education, 16(3), 2007.

scholarly journals Healthy Birth Practice #2: Walk, Move Around, and Change Positions Throughout Labor

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Ondeck
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Obstetric Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Freedom Of Movement ◽  
Normal Birth ◽  
Childbirth Experience ◽  
Care Practices

In the United States, obstetric care is intervention intensive, resulting in 1 in 3 women undergoing cesarean surgery wherein mobility is treated as an intervention rather than supporting the natural physiologic process for optimal birth. Women who use upright positions and are mobile during labor have shorter labors, receive less intervention, report less severe pain, and describe more satisfaction with their childbirth experience than women in recumbent positions. This article is an updated evidence-based review of the “Lamaze International Care Practices That Promote Normal Birth, Care Practice #2: Freedom of Movement Throughout Labor,” published in The Journal of Perinatal Education, 16(3), 2007.

scholarly journals Healthy Birth Practice #4: Avoid Interventions Unless They Are Medically Necessary

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith A. Lothian
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Monitoring ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Intravenous Fluids ◽  
Normal Birth ◽  
Electronic Fetal Monitoring ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring

Maternity care in the United States is intervention intensive. The routine use of intravenous fluids, restrictions on eating and drinking, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, epidural analgesia, and augmentation of labor characterize most U.S. births. The use of episiotomy is far from restrictive. These interventions disturb the normal physiology of labor and birth and restrict women’s ability to cope with labor. The result is a cascade of interventions that increase risk, including the risk of cesarean surgery, for women and babies. This article is an updated evidence-based review of the “Lamaze International Care Practices That Promote Normal Birth, Care Practice #4: No Routine Interventions,” published in The Journal of Perinatal Education, 16(3), 2007.

Who gets coached? A qualitative inquiry into community clinicians’ decisions to use caregiver coaching

Autism ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 136236132110594
Author(s):  
Liza Tomczuk ◽  
Rebecca E Stewart ◽  
Rinad S Beidas ◽  
David S Mandell ◽  
Melanie Pellecchia
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Early Intervention ◽  
The United States ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Autistic Children ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Marginalized Groups ◽  
Vulnerable Families

Clinicians’ beliefs about an intervention’s fit with an individual family influence whether they use it with that family. The factors that influence clinicians’ decisions to implement evidence-based practices for young autistic children have yet to be evaluated systematically. These factors may partially account for the significant disparities in quality of and access to early intervention. We examined disparities in clinicians’ reported use of caregiver coaching, an evidence-based practice, with families from minoritized or structurally marginalized groups, and the perceived reasons for those disparities, to assess the factors that influence clinicians’ use of caregiver coaching. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 36 early intervention clinicians from publicly funded early intervention agencies in two distinct geographic regions in the United States. Clinicians identified social and structural factors, including perceived family characteristics and stigma, that influenced their beliefs about the fit of coaching with families from minoritized or structurally marginalized groups. These findings point to the presence of beliefs that likely exacerbate disparities in access to evidence-based practices and reduce the quality of care for minoritized families of young autistic children. These findings highlight the need to develop and deploy equity-focused implementation strategies to improve both access to and quality of evidence-based practices for young autistic children from minoritized groups. Lay abstract Providers’ beliefs about an intervention’s fit with a family can affect whether or not they use that intervention with a family. The factors that affect providers’ decisions to use evidence-based practices for young autistic children have not been studied. These factors may play a role in the major differences we see in the quality of and access to early intervention services in the community. We looked at differences in providers’ use of caregiver coaching, an evidence-based practice, with families from minority or vulnerable backgrounds, and the possible reasons for those differences. We did this to figure out what factors affect providers’ use of caregiver coaching. We interviewed 36 early intervention providers from early intervention agencies in two different parts of the United States. Providers pointed out things like what they thought about a family’s circumstances that affected their beliefs about how well coaching fits with minority and vulnerable families. Our findings bring attention to these beliefs that likely make accessing evidence-based practices for minority and vulnerable families harder and lessen the quality of care for these families of young autistic children. These findings highlight the need to come up with and use strategies to improve both access to and the quality of evidence-based practices for young autistic children from minority and vulnerable groups.

scholarly journals Professor Slavin and the Development of Evidence-Based Education in China

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1021-1028
Author(s):  
Jijun Yao
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Education Research ◽  
The United States ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Johns Hopkins University ◽  
Chinese Scholars ◽  
Education In China

In the new century, the quantity and quality of empirical education research in China have been greatly improved, and more people are paying attention to and engaging in evidence-based research and practice in education. In this context, Professor Robert Slavin, a well- known expert in evidence-based education at Johns Hopkins University in the United States, contributed greatly to the guidance and assistance to the development of evidence-based education in China. He clarified some vague understandings of Chinese scholars on the research and reform of evidence-based education, trained and instructed Chinese scholars and students, and built a platform for exchanges between Chinese and foreign scholars, which has played an inestimable role in promoting the development of evidence-based education in China.

An Emerging Model of Primary Care for Older Adults: The House Call–Home Care Practice

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 110-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven H. Landers ◽  
Paul W. Gunn ◽  
Kurt C. Stange
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
House Calls ◽  
House Call ◽  
Care Practices

House calls to older adults have become more common, in part related to the emergence of medical practices that either emphasize or exclusively provide house calls. In this article we seek to describe organizational, clinician, and patient characteristics of house call–home medical care practices in the United States. We conducted telephone interviews with clinicians representing 36 randomly selected practices from across the United States. This study found that house call–home care practices typically are recently formed small groups of physicians and nurse practitioners that provide in-home primary care, especially chronic disease care, to Medicare beneficiaries. Clinicians are motivated by the opportunity to improve care and to maintain autonomy. This emerging model may represent a mutually beneficial trend for older adults and physicians.

scholarly journals Use of A Community of Practice For The Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices For Heart Failure Within The United States Department of Veterans Affairs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anju Sahay ◽  
Paul A. Heidenreich ◽  
Brian S Mittman ◽  
Parisa Gholami ◽  
Shoutzu Lin
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Department Of Veterans Affairs ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Evidence Based Practices

Abstract Communities of Practice (CoPs) are a promising approach to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) to improve care for chronic conditions like heart failure (HF). COPs involve a complex process of acquiring and converting both explicit and tacit knowledge into clinical activities. Formation: In July 2006, a CoP called the Heart Failure Provider Network (HF Network) was established in the United States (US) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) with the overarching goal of improving the quality of care for HF patients. The CoP has involved a total of 1,341 multidisciplinary and multilevel members at all 144 VA Health Care Systems (sites). Examples of CoP activities include discussions of interventions to decrease hospitalization rates and to empower patients and caregivers for self-management. Goals of the CoP include networking facilitation, information dissemination and exchange, collaboration and implementation of EBPs. Assessment: We conceptualized the assessment (formative evaluation) of the HF Network in terms of its various activities (inputs) and proximal impacts (mediators) at the individual-level, and its distal and ultimate impacts (outcomes) at the site-level leading to an improved culture of implementation of new/improved EBPs at the system-wide level. The HF Network membership grew steadily over the nine years. Most members were practicing clinicians (n = 891, 66.4%), followed by administrators (n = 342, 25.5%), researchers (n = 70, 5.2%), and others (n = 38, 2.8%). Participation was “active” for 70.9% versus “passive” for 29.4% of members. The distribution of active members (clinicians 64.7%, administrators 21.6%) was similar to the distribution of overall membership. Survey respondents perceived the HF Network as useful in terms of its varied activities and resources relevant for patient care. Members, particularly those that consider themselves influential in improving quality of care, noted multiple benefits of membership. These included confirmation of one’s own clinical practices, evidence-based changes to their practice and help in understanding facilitators and barriers in setting up or running HF clinics and other programs.

scholarly journals Healthy Birth Practice #6: Keep Mother and Baby Together— It’s Best for Mother, Baby, and Breastfeeding

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeannette T. Crenshaw
Keyword(s):  
Child Outcomes ◽  
Feeding Preference ◽  
Skin Care ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Normal Birth ◽  
The Hours ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Skin To Skin

Mothers and babies have a physiologic need to be together at the moment of birth and during the hours and days that follow. Keeping mothers and babies together is a safe and healthy birth practice. Evidence supports immediate, uninterrupted skin-to-skin care after vaginal birth and during and after cesarean surgery for all stable mothers and babies, regardless of feeding preference. Unlimited opportunities for skin-to-skin care and breastfeeding promote optimal maternal and child outcomes. This article is an updated evidence-based review of the “Lamaze International Care Practices That Promote Normal Birth, Care Practice #6: No Separation of Mother and Baby, With Unlimited Opportunities for Breastfeeding,” published in The Journal of Perinatal Education, 16(3), 2007.

scholarly journals Healthy Birth Practice #3: Bring a Loved One, Friend, or Doula for Continuous Support

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 194-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Green ◽  
Barbara A. Hotelling
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Barriers ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Loved One ◽  
Labor Support ◽  
Normal Birth ◽  
Continuous Support ◽  
Care Practices

All women should be allowed and encouraged to bring a loved one, friend, or doula to their birth without financial or cultural barriers. Continuous labor support offers benefits to mothers and their babies with no known harm. This article is an updated evidence-based review of the “Lamaze International Care Practices that Promote Normal Birth, Care Practice #3: Continuous Labor Support,” published in The Journal of Perinatal Education, 16(3), 2007.

440: Barriers to the Practice of Evidence Based Urology in the United States

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 147-148
Author(s):  
Philipp Dahm ◽  
Hubert R. Kuebler ◽  
Susan F. Fesperman ◽  
Roger L. Sur ◽  
Charles D. Scales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Evidence Based
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document