Collaborative Therapy

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Gil-Wilkerson ◽  
Susan B. Levin
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Therapy

Scope for Psychosocial Treatments in Psychosis: An Overview of Collaborative Therapy

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Gilbert ◽  
Kathryn Miller ◽  
Lesley Berk ◽  
Velma Ho ◽  
David Castle
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Psychotic Disorders ◽  
Psychosocial Support ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Psychosocial Needs ◽  
Psychosocial Treatments ◽  
Mental Health Consumers ◽  
Collaborative Therapy ◽  
Modular Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: The psychosocial needs of people with psychotic disorders are not being addressed adequately. The present paper outlines a proposed framework that will help to meet some of this deficit and deliver psychosocial treatments for these individuals, as part of routine clinical practice. Conclusions: The recent Australian study on low prevalence (psychotic) disorders found that, although most Australians (91%) with a psychotic illness were taking medication, few were receiving adequate psychosocial support from mental health services; fully 47% of these saw the need for a particular type of service that was not able to be accessed by them, either because of it simply not being available or not being affordable. The programme described herein will develop, evaluate and disseminate comprehensive modular treatment packages addressing the psychosocial needs of people with psychotic disorders. It is novel in terms of the comprehensiveness of the approach, the rigour of the evaluation (using a controlled experimental design), and the extent of intersectoral and multidisciplinary involvement in mapping needs, developing the interventions, and dissemination. The potential impact for mental health consumers with psychosis is enormous because currently there is no coherent and consistent approach to addressing their psychosocial needs. The impact for the scientific community will be great because there is currently very little by way of controlled trial data in this important area of activity.

scholarly journals Cultural Perspectives in Language and Speech Disorders

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Ndung'u ◽  
Mathew Kinyua
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Beliefs ◽  
Speech Disorders ◽  
Cultural Perspective ◽  
Gender Preferences ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Cultural Perspectives ◽  
Operation Smile ◽  
Management Procedures ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Collaborative Therapy

<p>Culture has a heavy overlay on the perceptions and the subsequent handling of persons with language and speech disorders. This article reviews the cultural perspectives of language and speech disorders as portrayed by persons with language and speech disorders, parents, teachers, and language and speech pathologists. The information on cultural perspectives was collected between November 2006 and August 2007 during Operation Smile, Kenya Chapter Missions. 20 persons, aged between 8 and 53 years, were interviewed. The research objective was to establish the cultural perspective that determines the interpretations of language and speech disorders and their subsequent management.</p> <p>The finding of the study is that there is a notable cultural association or correlation between cultural beliefs and language and speech disorders. There is also ignorance of the causes and management procedures of language and speech disorders. We conclude that there is a need to provide assessment and treatment protocols that are culturally fair, effective, and acceptable. Such protocols include taking into account gender preferences, adhering to culturally relevant communication patterns, and using collaborative therapy.</p>

scholarly journals COVID-19 Related Traumatic Distress in Psychotherapy Patients during the Pandemic: The Role of Attachment, Working Alliance, and Therapeutic Agency

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1288
Author(s):  
Katie Aafjes-van Doorn ◽  
Vera Békés ◽  
Xiaochen Luo
Keyword(s):  
Working Alliance ◽  
Attachment Anxiety ◽  
Online Therapy ◽  
Attachment Avoidance ◽  
Online Psychotherapy ◽  
Collaborative Therapy ◽  
Traumatic Distress ◽  
Different Levels

The early months of the COVID-19 pandemic have been a challenging time for many psychotherapy patients. To understand why certain patients were more resilient, we examined the role of patients’ attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance, as well as collaborative therapy experiences (perceived working alliance and therapeutic agency) in their online sessions on their COVID-related traumatic distress over a three-month period. A total of 466 patients in online psychotherapy completed a survey during the first weeks of the pandemic, and 121 of those completed a follow-up survey three months later. Lower distress at follow-up was predicted by patients’ lower attachment anxiety and higher therapeutic agency in their online sessions after controlling for baseline distress and time of survey completion. Higher working alliance predicted less distress at follow-up only for patients with high attachment anxiety. For patients with low attachment avoidance (i.e., more securely attached), higher therapeutic agency predicted less distress. These findings suggest that patients’ attachment anxiety and therapeutic agency may play significant roles also in online therapy during COVID-19 in patient’s experienced traumatic distress, and that working alliance and therapeutic agency may be differentially important for patients with different levels of attachment anxiety and avoidance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document